Target, accessibility and opinions
Published on: February 13, 2006 by Paul Boag
So, Target is being sued by the American National Federation for the Blind because of their inaccessible website. Apparently every web designer and his dog have an opinion on the subject and I have received a number of emails asking for mine.
I suppose I could say that my Christian morals demand that if society is able to help somebody they have an obligation to do so. I could also argue that the "free market" economy (which appears to be the main argument in support of Target's actions) is one step away from Social Darwinism. Of course, were I to say that, I would just be spoiling for a fight! ;)
The truth is I don't believe that my personal opinions on the subject (or the opinion of any other web designer) matter that much. There seems to be a huge amount of debate among web designers on the topic and yet few seem to be grasping the reality of the situation.
"I am a web designer Jim, not a politician!"
Web designers are not politicians, lawyers or judges. It is not our job to form government policy or write legislation. We are debating a subject which has long since been done to death by the people appointed to shape America's social justice system. I don't claim to be an expert on American law but it would seem to me that legislation already exists in the states outlining disability discrimination. It is not for us to argue as web designers the rights or wrongs of that legislation.
Equally we are not business owners. We do not have to balance PR concerns, with social responsibility and return on investment. We don't get to say what makes good business sense and what doesn't.
We are web designers damn it, act like it!
Ensuring your website meets basic accessibility requirements is a quick, simple job that will be a hell of a lot cheaper than any bad publicity or litigation you could potentially face
However we are web designer. It is our job to advise our clients on the practical implications of making their sites accessible and leave the final decision to them. If Target had called me when the American National Federation for the Blind first contacted them, my advice would have been straightforward. Ensuring your website meets basic accessibility requirements is a quick, simple job that will be a hell of a lot cheaper than any bad publicity or litigation you could potentially face.
If I was forced to point fingers here it would be at the web designers who produced this site. At Headscape, we don't ask our clients if they want their sites to be accessible, we just make them that way. As web designers we should be building in at least basic accessibility features by default because the cost of doing so is negligible.
Once again I would like to echo Andy Clarke's words in his interview for accessify.com:
Those people still delivering nested table layout, spacer gifs or ignoring accessibility can no longer call themselves web professionals.
If you are a business owner and this case has caught your attention, I have but one piece of advice... make sure your web designers are doing their job.
Comments
Comments are for the discussion of this post. If you have other questions / comments then post them to the forum or send me an email
Post by Jorge Pinon on February 13, 2006 5:41 AM
Post by Daniel Chesterton on February 13, 2006 11:53 AM
Post by patrick h. lauke on February 16, 2006 3:09 AM
Post by kultura on April 17, 2007 9:29 AM
Post by kultura on April 17, 2007 9:31 AM