<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vertical Media Queries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vertical-media-queries</link>
	<description>Advice on web design and digital strategy from Paul Boag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Brandwood</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-10226</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Brandwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-10226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;with the most common setup (browser window fully expanded, with no additional toolbars)&quot;


Is this really the case? I&#039;d have thought you&#039;d struggle to find a Windows machine without an additional toolbar and this doesn&#039;t cater for the varying levels of toolbar chrome in different browsers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;with the most common setup (browser window fully expanded, with no additional toolbars)&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this really the case? I&#8217;d have thought you&#8217;d struggle to find a Windows machine without an additional toolbar and this doesn&#8217;t cater for the varying levels of toolbar chrome in different browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9983</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;These days, concerns about the fold are behind us for the most part ...&quot;


How are concerns mostly behind us? You always need to be concerned about the fold so it&#039;s never blindly &quot;behind you.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These days, concerns about the fold are behind us for the most part &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>How are concerns mostly behind us? You always need to be concerned about the fold so it&#8217;s never blindly &#8220;behind you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9974</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9977</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Echter</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/dev/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Echter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/tumblog/vertical-media-queries/#comment-9981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#039;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#039;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#039;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#039;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#039;t handle vertical MQ&#039;s at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did in the past some experimenting with vertical MQ&#8217;s too, because I had a fixed footer that I wanted to change to a show/hide footer for the Kindle Fire (1024 x 600 pixels) The fixed footer covered the content, so I wanted to solve that with vertical MQ&#8217;s. It did work, but it gave display issues in IE8. I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the issue was and I didn&#8217;t investigate further what was causing that. I do use respond.js in all my projects to bring MQ support in IE8 and below and perhaps respond.js couldn&#8217;t handle vertical MQ&#8217;s at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: boagworld.com @ 2013-05-24 13:30:35 by W3 Total Cache -->