<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 180. Backend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=180</link>
	<description>Advice on web design and digital strategy from Paul Boag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Rowe</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree that of course we&#039;re all working at different levels of abstraction.  The discussion really was purposely aimed around the differences between the two .net approaches - with particular reference to how that effected the designer/developer workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I usually try to balance any discussion around these kind of things, as you say we also discussed the usefulness and benefit of using higher levels of abstraction.  I&#039;m also very keen on trying to ensure I don&#039;t misrepresent .net mvc as a replacement for some kind of &#039;poor&#039; webforms (which isn&#039;t the case), so although we discussed the issues with webforms we were also saying that webforms is a very powerful framework - I hope that came through.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Totally appreciate you taking the time to comment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that of course we&#8217;re all working at different levels of abstraction.  The discussion really was purposely aimed around the differences between the two .net approaches &#8211; with particular reference to how that effected the designer/developer workflows.</p>
<p>I usually try to balance any discussion around these kind of things, as you say we also discussed the usefulness and benefit of using higher levels of abstraction.  I&#8217;m also very keen on trying to ensure I don&#8217;t misrepresent .net mvc as a replacement for some kind of &#8216;poor&#8217; webforms (which isn&#8217;t the case), so although we discussed the issues with webforms we were also saying that webforms is a very powerful framework &#8211; I hope that came through.</p>
<p>Totally appreciate you taking the time to comment.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Rowe</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5764</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Rob,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Glad you appreciated the dev oriented podcast.  You&#039;re right, I hadn&#039;t realised I missed out mention of Team System (I&#039;d even spoke to Stanton about it a few weeks before on Twitter - http://twitter.com/cargowire/status/3283930389).  Its omission was purely accidental, mainly down to the fact that none of the speakers on the podcast were/are currently using it.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob,</p>
<p>Glad you appreciated the dev oriented podcast.  You&#8217;re right, I hadn&#8217;t realised I missed out mention of Team System (I&#8217;d even spoke to Stanton about it a few weeks before on Twitter &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/cargowire/status/3283930389" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/cargowire/status/3283930389</a>).  Its omission was purely accidental, mainly down to the fact that none of the speakers on the podcast were/are currently using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lang</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5763</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;gah! Comment system stripped the tag ...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That last comment reads much more snarky than it’s meant. Pretend it’s between &#039;jovial&#039; tags.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When will the web invent the &#039;jovial&#039; tag?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gah! Comment system stripped the tag &#8230;</p>
<p>That last comment reads much more snarky than it’s meant. Pretend it’s between &#8216;jovial&#8217; tags.</p>
<p>When will the web invent the &#8216;jovial&#8217; tag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lang</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5762</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That last comments reads much more snarky than it&#039;s meant. Pretend it&#039;s between  tags.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When will the web invent the  tag?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last comments reads much more snarky than it&#8217;s meant. Pretend it&#8217;s between  tags.</p>
<p>When will the web invent the  tag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lang</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re going to slam &#039;some&#039; .NET developers who &#039;don&#039;t know how the internet works&#039; then I would argue that unless you&#039;ve written a UDP socket exchange with your own browser on the front then all you&#039;re doing is using a framework. .NET IS a framework. PHP is a framework. J2EE is framework. I know people who would argue that YOU don&#039;t actually know how the net works unless you&#039;ve written some socket facing packet transfer protocols in C, compiled for the server. What you mean you haven&#039;t? What, are you not interested?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, that&#039;s ridiculous. You know how the internet works through the level of abstraction that you need to do your job. Your job being to meet the requirements on time and to budget. The snobbery about people &#039;drag and drop&#039; and &#039;not interested&#039; is very dismissive and out of place. Include and educate those who might be dragging and dropping now, rather than dismiss and apologise for their shortcomings.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In your defense, you do seem to mention that there is a time and place for abstraction but it is weighed under a recurring barrage of how much better things are if you come from a PHP or Classic ASP background. In the future, please don&#039;t labour a point (which often happens when you have a load of people agreeing with each other). Make the point and move on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MVC is just another abstraction, like all the other abstractions. You go as deep as you need to and no further because there&#039;s no point.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to slam &#8216;some&#8217; .NET developers who &#8216;don&#8217;t know how the internet works&#8217; then I would argue that unless you&#8217;ve written a UDP socket exchange with your own browser on the front then all you&#8217;re doing is using a framework. .NET IS a framework. PHP is a framework. J2EE is framework. I know people who would argue that YOU don&#8217;t actually know how the net works unless you&#8217;ve written some socket facing packet transfer protocols in C, compiled for the server. What you mean you haven&#8217;t? What, are you not interested?</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s ridiculous. You know how the internet works through the level of abstraction that you need to do your job. Your job being to meet the requirements on time and to budget. The snobbery about people &#8216;drag and drop&#8217; and &#8216;not interested&#8217; is very dismissive and out of place. Include and educate those who might be dragging and dropping now, rather than dismiss and apologise for their shortcomings.</p>
<p>In your defense, you do seem to mention that there is a time and place for abstraction but it is weighed under a recurring barrage of how much better things are if you come from a PHP or Classic ASP background. In the future, please don&#8217;t labour a point (which often happens when you have a load of people agreeing with each other). Make the point and move on.</p>
<p>MVC is just another abstraction, like all the other abstractions. You go as deep as you need to and no further because there&#8217;s no point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lang</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice to hear a Dev podcast. Visual Source Safe is to source control as Windows 3.1 is to a GUI OS. The current MS system for source control, merging, branching, checking in and out, build deploy and so on is Team System. For a distributed team, it&#039;s ideal and plugs into VS like Source Safe. Was surprised you hadn&#039;t mentioned it.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear a Dev podcast. Visual Source Safe is to source control as Windows 3.1 is to a GUI OS. The current MS system for source control, merging, branching, checking in and out, build deploy and so on is Team System. For a distributed team, it&#8217;s ideal and plugs into VS like Source Safe. Was surprised you hadn&#8217;t mentioned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb Crump</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5759</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Crump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The main problem with long URLs is that people do try to email them and they do break and cause user problems that way...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just to let you know that there is an open-source URL shortener I found: http://urlshort.sourceforge.net/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess it could be incorporated into sites and provide a short url on demand.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem with long URLs is that people do try to email them and they do break and cause user problems that way&#8230;</p>
<p>Just to let you know that there is an open-source URL shortener I found: <a href="http://urlshort.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://urlshort.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
<p>I guess it could be incorporated into sites and provide a short url on demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilemski</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5758</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilemski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I thought this was a really great show! I&#039;d like to suggest doing a development show more often - monthly maybe?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was a really great show! I&#8217;d like to suggest doing a development show more often &#8211; monthly maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5757</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the great show. I a long-time subscriber and have been waiting for a development episode for ages!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great show. I a long-time subscriber and have been waiting for a development episode for ages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Watson</title>
		<link>http://boagworld.com/podcast/180/#comment-5756</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boagworld.com/?p=1968#comment-5756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had to stop by and compliment you on an outstanding podcast. I listened to it twice in one day last week - once on the way to a clients premises and once on the way home!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a front end designer myself with aspirations of learning server side code. I&#039;ve just recently decided to go down the .Net route in order to develop a better work flow between my team and that of our own application developers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At this stage I&#039;ve had exposure to Visual Studio and all of the problems that I&#039;ve come across seem like they might be solved by MVC so hopefully this will be something that I&#039;ll be actively involved in soon enough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great work guys and please continue to throw in the odd tech heavy podcast every once in a while. I found this one to be very inspiring!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>I had to stop by and compliment you on an outstanding podcast. I listened to it twice in one day last week &#8211; once on the way to a clients premises and once on the way home!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a front end designer myself with aspirations of learning server side code. I&#8217;ve just recently decided to go down the .Net route in order to develop a better work flow between my team and that of our own application developers.</p>
<p>At this stage I&#8217;ve had exposure to Visual Studio and all of the problems that I&#8217;ve come across seem like they might be solved by MVC so hopefully this will be something that I&#8217;ll be actively involved in soon enough.</p>
<p>Great work guys and please continue to throw in the odd tech heavy podcast every once in a while. I found this one to be very inspiring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: boagworld.com @ 2013-05-24 16:28:01 by W3 Total Cache -->