Skip to content

A podcast for those who design, develop and run websites.

Boagworld is the personal website of Paul (the Wurzel) Boag who lives in the heart of rural Dorset. He produces a weekly podcast along with Marcus (pop star) Lillington on all things relating to building and running websites.

Latest shows

127. Context
In this week's show we discuss taking context into consideration when designing websites and we answer your questions about video for an elderly audience and the most influential books in the industry. 
126. Scaling
In this weeks show we learn lessons from the botched iPhone launch here in the UK. We chat to Jeff Veen about the designer / developer relationship and Marcus talks about adding jingles to your website.
125. Copy
In this weeks show we discuss how to give personality to your site copy and we talk with Elliot Jay Stocks about going freelance.
124. HTML 5
In this weeks show we explore how to create better online surveys and Lachlan Hunt joins us to discuss HTML5
123. Plight
In this weeks show we review Textmate and the Top 5 Tips for Web Designers and we discuss the plight of in-house designers.

or view all shows

Have your say

Leave a message for the show...

Buy my book: The website owners manual. A book for all those involved in designing, developing or running websites on a daily basis.

Web standards Charter

Published on: October 4, 2005 by Paul Boag

Robert Nyman and Vlad Alexander have published An Open Letter to WaSP, in which they call for a unified way of promoting web standards through a web standards charter.

At first glance this seemed like a great idea, but I have to say after some consideration, I am not so sure. I would like it to work, but then I would like there to be a single browser that is perfectly compliant! Doesn't mean I am going to get my wishes.

Just another thing to disagree about!

Surely, a WASP charter is just going to replicate the problems we see in the interpretation of W3C guidelines.

Take for example the issue of accessibility. The majority of disagreements come from the interpretation of the WAI guidelines, which were created to bring a standard approach to website accessibility. Surely, a WASP charter is just going to replicate the problems we see in this area.

Unless the charter becomes a massive unreadable legal document it is going to be open to interpretation and so people will be arguing about this in the same way as they argue about W3C guidelines.

Disagreement is inevitable

For better or worse, the web is full of people expressing opinions and they are going to disagree. I do not believe that a "charter" will prevent that.

The reality is that there are many ways of implementing both web standards and accessibility. In fact, it is fair to say there is no single "right way" of doing things. It depends on many factors from target audience to available budget! If a charter took these different approaches into account it would leave itself open to interpretation.

I really wish a charter could help bring clarity but I am just not sure it will.

Comments

Comments are for the discussion of this post. If you have other questions / comments then post them to the forum or send me an email

  • Post by Marcus on October 4, 2005 8:17 PM

    Even if it was a huge legal document it would still be open to interpretation by lawyers no doubt ;)

  • Post by Forum, Program, Download on December 26, 2007 9:54 AM

    thank you sharing, perfect article

  • Post by Dizi, indir on December 26, 2007 9:57 AM

    great job, special thanks...

Leave a comment

Additional Information

Supporting boagworld

Boagworld only exists thanks to the kind support of the following people. Check them out.

Speaking and writing

From FeedInformer