5 'New' Skills that Every Web Designer Needs to Know

What does it mean to be a web designer? The chances are its a lot more than you think. As the web becomes increasingly complex so do our clients demands.


The world of web design is changing at a scary rate. Where once all we needed was Photoshop and Frontpage [joke], now we have to endure list posts like this one telling us to learn more than ever. It is kind of depressing really.

Of course one option is to specialise. You can intentionally limit your expertise to one area and turn down work outside of that specialism. Although there are a lot of advantages to this approach it is not an option for most web designers.

Many of us are not able to turn away work even if we wanted. What is more our clients tend to presume we know ‘everything about the web’.

For the majority of us we have to continue being generalists. This involves expanding our knowledge into ever more diverse areas.

From my perspective there are 5 skills you would not traditionally associated with the role of web design that are becoming increasingly important. These are…

  • Marketing
  • Copywriting
  • Contextual awareness
  • Strategy
  • Psychology

Let us look at each in turn.

1. Marketing

Increasingly website owners are grasping that their online marketing strategy has to be about more than their website. The ‘build it and they will come’ mentality has gone and they realise that their website is the hub for a broader strategy.

 

businessman drawing a website schema in a whiteboard

Helder Almeida, Shutterstock

Understanding SEO

At the most basic level clients expect us to have an understanding of SEO. Unfortunately their expectations in this area are often unrealistic (“I need to be number one on the term ‘Internet’”). It is our job to educate them about the reality of SEO.

Of course to do that we need to understand the area ourselves. What is best practice within SEO? What impacts does SEO have on usability, accessibility and copy?

However, SEO is not the only consideration. Increasingly clients are recognising the power of social media.

Advising on Social Media

An increasing number of website owners are looking to engage their target audience through the use of social media. They see their target audience gravitating towards services like Youtube, Facebook and Twitter so wish to reach them there.

However as with SEO their knowledge is limited. Often when they try they make horrendous mistakes. Even big brands have suffered from this problem as is apparent from the recent Skittles and Nestle incidents.

Once again they need help and so turn to us. We need to have a clear understanding of community engagement. We need an understanding of how to deal with conflict, encourage participation and spur users into action.

2. Copywriting

Probably the most important new skill we need to learn as designers is copywriting. Let’s face it, most websites have crappy copy.

The majority of that copy is down to the client and so we tend to wash our hands of it. However, not all of it is the client’s responsibility.

Who writes those little pieces of microcopy that appear across the websites we design? You know, the error messages, section headings, instructional text and button labels. Normally it is the web designer.

The problem is that the words we use can have a massive impact on usability, comprehension and conversion. Take for example 404 pages. Other than web designers who the hell knows what a 404 page is?

404 error page from Wufoo.com

It is not just us that needs to learn to write better copy. The client does as well. The question is who will teach them? Once again the burden falls to us.

Setting aside the issue of whether a designer is the best person to teach copywriting (an issue I address later), often there is nobody else. We therefore need to understand the principles of writing for the web and indeed more general copywriting techniques. In particular I think we need to help the client establish consistency and tone in their copy. After all we have worked hard to project the right tone in our design.

3. Contextual awareness

There was a time when you could make certain assumptions about how somebody was accessing a website. The chances were they used a desktop computer and sat at a desk.

However, things have changed. Now they could be using a netbook on the sofa or a mobile phone at the bus stop. This has a profound effect on how we design websites. We need to be contextually aware. We need to understand how both environment and device alters the way people interact with a website.

Child using her phone to access the web on a train

JJ pixs, Shutterstock

The impact of environment

Do you take time to consider the environment in which users are likely to be encountering your website? Do you understand how these environmental differences could impact behaviour?

For example a mother with a new born baby may be accessing the web from a home computer. However, her environment could well be far from perfect. Her child could be crying. She may be sleep deprived. These things impact how easily she can use your website.

The impact of the device

With a growing number of devices accessing the web we need to consider a greater number of factors that influence the users interaction. Screen size, functionality and input devices are just three examples.

When a user could be using a touch screen, a keyboard or a mouse to interact with your website, it makes designing the user interface much harder.

If we are to survive in this multi-device, multi-environment age we need to better understand how these contexts alter the user’s interaction. For example, when was the last time you did user testing that happened in the users normal environment or navigate a website with just a keyboard.

Of course your clients may not want to invest in supporting multiple devices or users who access the web ‘on the road’. They maybe right when they say that it doesn’t justify the investment. On the other hand they might be missing the bigger picture. In which case it is down to you to help.

4. Strategy

So many clients do not really know why they have a website or how to measure its success. They hire you without understanding that the website should be apart of a broader strategy. Often it falls to us to guide them through the process.

 

Vision Success From Goal and Idea in 3d kentoh, Shutterstock

This means we need to brush up on our business strategy skills. We need to be able to help our clients:

  • set business objectives,
  • identify target audiences,
  • establish success criteria,
  • decide on calls to action

It strikes me as insane that many organisations do not already have these things defined. However, they do not.

The question is do you feel prepared to guide users through the process? Are you confident in talking about market segmentation or business analysis? If not then it is time to broaden your horizons.

5. Psychology

My final skills may well be the most important of all (yes I know I said that about copywriting). It is certainly the skill you will use more than any of the others.

In order to be effective web designers these days, we need a good understanding of psychology.

For a long time psychology has been a part of our job. Designing usable websites requires an understanding of how users think and complete tasks. However, it is no loner enough to create websites that are merely usable. Increasingly we are looking to create sites that make users passionate and engaged. That takes a deeper understanding of what makes people tick.

Selective focus on the word psychology. Mark Poprocki, Shutterstock

A good grasp of human psychology goes further than just design and usability. If you understand how people think it can also help with building and engaging communities. It allows you to write better copy, promote your services and win more pitches.

Our role almost exclusively involves understand and engaging with people. Whether users, clients or colleagues, if we understand how they think we can motivate them into taking action. We can convince and persuade, nudging them in the direction we wish to go.

To survive in the modern world of web design we need to really understand the human condition so we can use it to our advantage.

How do I learn all this stuff?

By this point you are probably feeling somewhat overwhelmed. How the hell do you get your head around all of this new stuff on top of everything else.

It’s a fair question and I have no easy answer. However, I would suggest one thing: Do you really need to read yet another CSS article or watch another Photoshop tutorial? Do you need to attend a conference about the latest jQuery techniques or would your time be better spent broadening your horizons.

I rarely read anything about HTML, CSS or Javascript anymore. I do enough to keep up-to-date but other than that my reading is not normally web design related.

I read books on business theory, follow blogs on customer service and listen to audiobooks about marketing.

The problem is that the web design community (like any community) can become very isolated by all talking to one another and regurgitating the same old stuff. If we want to meet the needs of our clients, we must start looking further afield for our education.

Is this unreasonable?

You may suggest it is unreasonable to expect one individual to learn all of this. The answer is yes it is. However, that does not change the reality that this is what our clients want and expect.

Clients are looking for a one-stop-shop. They are not looking to deal with multiple suppliers and the associated work of managing different companies. Obviously this is a generalisation and I am not arguing against specialising.

I am however saying that we all need a broad knowledge in todays marketplace.

Does that mean we need a deep knowledge of marketing or copywriting? No it does not. However, it does mean we need to know enough to point our clients in the right direction. Sometimes that might be us suggesting solutions, sometimes it might be us recommending an expert. However, without some knowledge on our part we cannot make those judgements.

So if you want to delight your clients and deliver above and beyond what they get from the competition, it is time to broaden your knowledge.

How not to alienate visitors who just want to talk

Too many websites owners are more concerned with gathering data from their users rather than initiating a dialogue. If your users want to talk to you, don’t make it difficult.

It’s an age old gripe amongst web users. The over-long form. Field after field of questions and tick boxes when all we want to do is ask a question. A simple question:

‘When is this product likely to be back in stock?’

But still we are asked for our fax number, postal address, age, marital status and whether we have any ‘dependents under 18 living with us’ The mind boggles.

Now we’ve lived amongst marketeers long enough to realise that this is their work. This is an opportunity to gather as much profiling data about a consumer as is possible in order to

  • assist in customer relationship marketing
  • better inform the brand of their audience’s habits
  • aid new product development
  • a combination of the above

While I’m no fan of these forms, I count myself as at least 30% marketeer and am therefore aware that in my experience alone, this data has always gone to good use. To providing a better service / product / experience.

What I find remarkably absent though, is the website owners willingness to engage their audiences in a dialogue on their terms. I accept that I the website owner would like all this information, but do I deserve it? Do I? Well, in a lot of cases, no, you don’t.

If I want to open a dialogue with a brand via their website, I want it on my terms, and I often care little about the future requirements of that brand, no matter how earth-shattering my responses might be to a short questionnaire.
To that end I thought I’d give a few examples of how we can build better websites, where we deliver dialogue to our users, rather than just delivering data to our clients. And then perhaps, we can make people care about our needs, by good old customer service.

Social Networks

If you feel your audience have a significant presence on these networks then be sure you do. Publicise how to get in touch with you on these networks, and when people do respond in a timely fashion. If that is there chosen way to make initial contact, then respect that, and in time you will build their loyalty. Answer queries and in time if that prospect decides to enquire about your product or service then they will call and you can ask all the ancillary questions you might have then. By that point they are a hot prospect and already favourably disposed to you and will do so willingly.

social networks icons

Telephone Numbers

Provide one. Always. There are people out there who will always prefer to call. I know because I am one. And if that is their choice, then do not put obstacles in their way. Don’t make someone search endlessly through the site to find it. Don’t make them read pages of FAQ’s and Knowledge Base articles before presenting a phone number after one last click of a ‘Was This Information Useful – Yes/Know’ button. Make it easy to open a dialogue, and then if you have a genuine need for profiling data then you can always ask if they would mind asking a few questions over the phone.

After you have answered their questions first of course.

telephone

Contact Forms

If we haven’t already said enough about these already, then some further observations. Your customer has a query about you. The very least they need to raise (IMHO) are the following:

What my query is:

  • How would I like to be contacted regarding this?
  • When am I likely to get a response?

Now this is a very slim form by anyone’s standards. But at its core is the idea that you are putting as few obstacles in your audiences way as possible, and providing them with a chance to choose how they are contacted and informing them as to when that will be. Deliver on those last two and you are in business. Again, the dialogue is made easy, and is delivered on your audience’s terms.

Wufoo

Ask Questions

Why is this one so often overlooked? You have a CMS. You might even have a blog. You might even have comments enabled. You want to know some information about your audience, and yet you still build forms so convoluted that to ask a one line question I must still answer 10 unrelated ones. Ask questions of your audience on your site. Add them into comments on your blog. And provide an email address where if they would be so kind, they might want to send their thoughts / ideas about such and such. Again, any dialogue is on their terms. Entered into at their own will, with as much or as little effort required as they see fit.

Credit Where Credit is Due

Quite often a customer will ask good question about your product. You provide them with a swift answer and then pat yourself on the back for your helpfulness and timely response. The trouble is you have scores of similarly confused customers you could also benefit from the same help. So post the question on your site – ‘Mr Andrews of Lambeth asked a great question – where do I find the off switch on this petrol chainsaw?’ – Well, it’s on the handle, just by the power cord. Thanks Mr Andrews!

Credit your audience with asking a valid question, and then broadcast that to your other clients. Some of the best customer service is born out making public that you are only human and like everyone else, sometimes make mistakes.

Sign saying thankyou

Mind Your P’s and Q’s

Be grateful. For goodness’s sake, be grateful. As Paul has said in the past, people are aware that their opinions and their data has a value to brand / business owners, and so if they give their time and their opinions to you free of charge then the least you can do is be grateful. If you are a small business or a start-up, then this could be the only chance you might have to have a one-on-one relationship with your customers. If you deal only to 10 or 20 clients then you have no excuse really not to have a close relationship with them and to provide a good customer experience. Larger organisations have to use a more automated approach down to sheer volume. But even these, in fact primarily these, can benefit greatly from making their experience suit the user, rather than the website owner.

Sample feedback form

So there it is. Think for a minute about what is really going to drive the sales process. Are you a more profitable business because you know all there is to know about your prospects, or because you are accessible and helpful when dealing with your customers? Do you deliver what they want, or what you want? Is your website a barrier to real contact, or is it a conduit for it?

Food for thought.

Running a successful web design agency

Mike and Keir from Carsonified interview Marcus and Paul on how they have made Headscape the successful web design agency it is today.

Keir: Okay, hi Paul

Paul: Hello!

Keir: Thanks for joining us.

Paul: That’s alright!

Keir: Thanks for agreeing to let us turn the tables.

Paul: Are we not saying hello to Marcus?

Keir: Oh sorry, hello Marcus!

Paul: He’s refusing to talk now!

Marcus: Hello!

Keir: So we’ll ease you guys in gently, first of all to you Paul, obviously now your company has grown big and strong and you’ve moved on really from being a web designer / builder…

Marcus: I want to see where this is going!

Paul: You’re going to ask me what my job is aren’t you?!

Keir: No! I’m not going to ask that I’m just going to ask do you miss doing that, being hands on, that sort of thing?

Paul: I have moments of it, yeah. Because I’m somebody who has a short attention span, and I like skipping from thing to thing, I felt like I’d reached a point where when I was designing, all my designs were looking the same. Which was an indication that…

Keir: I think Marcus is nodding for some reason Paul..!

Paul: That my designs all look the same?! So that to me was the part where I had to start moving on and doing different things. But no, I dabble still, I do Boagworld, I do Headscape, but yeah, I do miss it sometimes.

Headscape website

Keir: On the same subject, do you find it hard to relinquish that control at all?

Marcus: No!

Paul: (Laughs) No! Not at all!

Marcus: Sorry I was answering for Paul!

Paul: And I think you’re correct! No, I have certain standards that I think we should keep to as a company in terms of quality of code, that kind of thing. But the guys at Headscape are very good. So it’s often semantic arguments that we have rather than anything of value! In terms of design I have to battle against the fact that I have personal preferences in that I have a design style…you have a design style. When you’re working with a designer, not everybody at Headscape produces design that is in line with my personal aesthetic, and it should be that way because you want a broad range of stuff, but sometimes I struggle to recognise that this is a good piece of design, it’s just not what I like.

Keir: Is there not a Headscape aesthetic, a little bit?

Paul: I think there is to some degree, we pretend there isn’t and we tell our clients there isn’t, but I think there probably is, and I think that’s largely come about (a) because of my own personal bias, but (b) because of the type of clients we work with. With the majority of clients we work with we would be laughed out of the room if we did the kind of stuff you do.

Marcus: That’s a bit harsh! Bloody Hell!

Paul: I’m not saying its bad! It’s great design!

Keir: I think a nice big pumping heart on the homepage of Headscape? That would go down a treat Paul!

Paul: And I know that Mike can do that kind of design.

Marcus: We’ve been talking Mike up a lot lately.

Paul: I know!

Marcus: We’ll have to start interviewing you now!

Keir: Right, back to the questions!

Marcus: As an inspiration for the guys at Headscape to maybe go down a different route, and your work is very inspirational from that point of view. They all say ‘Ooo Yeah, we like a bit of that!’

Keir: That’s nice to know!

Paul: They need to have opportunities to break out from the constraints and the boxes that they’re put in because of the type of clients that we work for.

Keir: So that raises an interesting question, how do you deal with that internally when someone comes and the brief maybe doesn’t quite need a new avenue to go down – how do you hold a designer back from experimenting, do you suggest other outlets internally?

Paul: To be entirely frank with you, our problem at the moment is the other way round, that our designers self-censor themselves, because they work on so many of these kinds of sites, and they predict what the client is going to say and so hold back sometimes.

Keir: And are they normally right or is there room for expression?

Paul: Yeah, they are normally right, but that’s not the point. I see it as our job to push the client. I mean there’s a classic example, I won’t name the client but there was one recently that said they wanted something ‘different’ and ‘radical’ and so we said ‘are you sure?’, and then we did all this cool stuff for them and then they said ‘could we tone it back?’ and so I turned round and said ‘you wanted something radical?’ to which they responded ‘Yeah, we didn’t really did we?!’ (Laughs)

Keir: So what do you see as the hot topics, or is there anything in the web world right now that really excites you? Or even you Marcus?

Paul: (Pauses, sighs) No. No!

Marcus: I’m much more business oriented, so things that excite me are…

Paul: Spreadsheets?!

Marcus: No, no… God no! Because we’ve been doing this for a long time, and we were never the sort of people to say ‘in five years time we’d like to be there’ but then suddenly we find ‘Oh, we’re there!’, so then you find yourself saying ‘What now then?’ and so I’m more interested in what the new thing would be. Because I’m not a designer, I’m not a developer, so I don’t really feel it’s my job to get enthused about anything in particular, HTML5 for example. I’m like, ‘great, cool!’ Paul is much better placed to answer that question as it’s not my specialism. My specialism in this world, if I have one, is talking to people who have websites about what their website could do for them, and so to a certain extent I need to be informed, but he does that for me.

Boagworld Podcast Live

Image Source

Keir: So how do you split your work for a new client? I contact Headscape for whatever reason, we agree to meet, I give you a brief outline of what my requirements are, would I speak to you (Marcus) and what sort of stuff would you want to get out of me and then would you hand over to Paul or the Project Managers?

Marcus: It varies. If it was a really big project I’d say to someone on the phone…

Keir: Give it to someone else!

Marcus: (Emphatically) No! No! Rather than have a lengthy chat on the phone I’d say I’ll come and meet you, and it would usually just be me at that point. And for virtually all projects people will come to us with a ‘We want to do something’, not a ‘We’ve heard you guys are quite good, what can you do for us?’ 99% of the time people have a pretty specific idea that they want us to do x, y or z, so I’ll go along and talk about that, and question why they might want to do that – that’s really the big part of it actually. Why do you want to do that? How’s that going to help you? Is it going to make you more money, is it going to make people who come to your site happier?

Keir: So very much from the business angle, the benefits of having a web presence or what expanding it will do for their own business? Bottom line stuff really?

Marcus: Yeah, to a certain extent, but also that’s the kind of nice client who comes to us. Quite often what we’re doing is responding to invitations to tender, and then it’s case of a brief will come through and we will respond usually with a phone call and questions – what do you mean by this and this and this, are you sure you want to be doing that. We’ll respond with a proposal and hopefully we’ll be invited back to talk to these people, at which point I’ll wheel him out (Paul!) and he’ll enthuse at them for half an hour!

Paul: It takes me a while to latch on to the part of the project that excites me, because if you go into a pitch not excited about the project, you ain’t gonna win it.

Keir: Sure.

Paul: But once you’ve indentified that thing in it that really grabs you and you want to do then I’m away and it’s great. So I mean, I tend to go in at the pitch stage and I give the big presentation. Then we normally, if we win it, at the beginning part of the project is where I flesh out that stuff that I was enthusing about, so where we really develop and set the direction of it. I talk the client through the process, help them to focus the vision, and that’s done in conjunction with the development team, the developer, project manager, designer, all the rest of it. Once that process has been done I step back and the project manager runs with the project.

Marcus: That’s the big bit out that I do. Requirements, information architecture, stakeholder interviews, all that stuff, and then I’ll step away from it usually. Then project managers, designers and developers get on and build it.

Paul: Periodically through the project I keep my eye on it to make sure that that vision that was created at the start of the project hasn’t been lost at any stage.

Keir: Just quickly because I’m really keen to know, there’s a lot of talk in the internet about, and I hate the term, spec work. Mark and I have talked about this a lot. I’m of the opinion that doing a tender or response to a proposal could be deemed as doing spec work in some respects because by the definition you’re doing work – how much time or value and what’s the end product of that…

Marcus: Shall I tell you how I define it? I as a sales person, and I do information architecture as well and that is all paid work, but at least 50% of my role is as a sales person and sales people don’t get paid by clients.

Paul: They’re a cost of sale.

Marcus: So if it’s work that I’m doing then it’s fine, if I have to get a designer to do work as part of that document, then I don’t think that’s right

Paul: Because those are chargeable people, I’m a chargeable person.

Keir: We know that Paul!

Paul: The most that Marcus would require of me would be to bounce some ideas around in the proposal stage. The pitch obviously is free; we would go up and do that. But the way that I view it actually is that spec work in my opinion is work that you give to a client that could potentially be used in the actual project. So our proposal documents aren’t spec work….feel free to disagree

Keir: No, it’s interesting because you make it sound like you go to a pitch with nothing?

Marcus: Correct. We don’t pitch any graphics ever.

Paul: No. Never. Never any graphics.

Keir: OK, so how much work would you say goes into a pitch?

Paul: Into the pitch itself?

Keir: Not the actual time of the pitch.

Paul: OK, preparing for the pitch, well the proposal, a lot of work goes into that.

Marcus: At least a day. Usually two.

Paul: Because that, with the type of work that we do, there’s quite a lot of boilerplate in it, ‘We’re Headscape this is what we do’ but with large public sector organisations that we tender for they want to know a lot of detail like financial history, they want to know the name of your third child, but it’s not a document that necessarily contains lots of ideas.

Marcus: A good way to think about the process is – we’ve won the work, and the process usually starts off with him analysing the existing website, the brief they’ve got, talking ideas, he’ll make a bunch of recommendations out of his own mind as it were. I’ll then test that on a load of stakeholders via one to one interviews. Based on that we’ll then put together a report which pulls all that together. Then we’ll do information architecture, then we’ll do mood boards that will kick in to the actual design. And that’s a load of work that I’ve just described. If we value giving designs up front then all of that is pointless.

Paul: It’s the fact that before you make a recommendation to the client, either in terms of visuals or in terms of the direction or vision of the site, you need to understand the client, you need to understand the business and the objectives. You never get all of that from a brief. It doesn’t matter how thorough they think the brief is. So therefore our proposals are very detailed responses to the brief that has been provided. But oftentimes that not what we’ll end up delivering. Often we’ll win the work, do a lot of research work and then turn round to them and say ‘Actually what you asked for out of the gate was this, and that’s not the right thing, we need to be going in this direction.’ So the proposal document only really exists to establish our credibility and to get us to the point of actually winning the work. There’s not loads of stuff in that proposal that they could take and say ‘A-ha’ I really like these ideas I’m going to take these and go with another agency. It’s not that type of document, but with a piece of speculative design they could do that, they could say ‘A-ha’ I really like this bit of design, I’m going to take this and give it someone who is cheaper.

Marcus: To finally nail this point to the table! We see proposals and pitches, the proper response from us is to basically tell our prospective clients that we can do a really good job, and give them lots of reasons why. We think your project might be really similar to the one we did for this client. Look at all the work we did on this and this was the process we went through, with lots of pictures of what we did for that client, but no actual ‘ We might be able to do something that looks a bit like this for you.’

Keir: That’s a historical thing though because you’ve got a canon of work, you’ve got heritage. What would your advice be to young people up and coming, 18, 19 20 years of age when you’ve not got that canon, you’ve not got that history?

Paul: I would encourage them to actually do some voluntary work.

Keir: Build up the portfolio

Paul: Yeah.

Marcus: It’s the same when you’re looking for a job, we want to see your portfolio, what you’ve done before and we think clients are the same.

Paul: My attitude is, let’s take a piece of speculative design work is going to cost two days of a designers time – I’m just plucking random figures out of the air here – but you could spend two days doing speculative design work for some dodgy guy who says ‘If you do some speculative design work you’ll win the business’ – and let’s be honest, these are the kind of guys you are going to be working for when you start out – screw that for a game of soldiers, he’s just trying to get one over on you. I’d prefer to spend to the two days working for a local charity that have got no money but a really worthy cause, give them a great design that they can take away and build or do what they want with, and then I’ve got a good portfolio piece.

Marcus: That said, we used to do designs up front. We were shooting ourselves in the foot doing it.

Keir: Before we move on, I think the one thing that struck me was of your comments, and I think it was in response to a particular blog post was that spec design work was actually bad for the client, more than it is for the designer which is quite a unique perspective

Paul: I was reading some of my stuff over that because I think we have a rock solid argument. I won’t go through the whole argument now because there are other things to talk about but basically it boils down to the fact that as a designer or developer you are not well enough informed at the spec stage to produce anything other than a piece of show-off work – so all you are doing is going ‘Taa Daa!!’ look how talented we are! You are not solving any problems, you are not challenging their brief, you are literally just doing a bit of fancy work. And the reality is that if you are the client you are paying for it anyway, because we have to roll the cost of sale into the project. But here’s the killer. You’re not just paying for the piece of speculative work I’ve done for you, but you’re also paying for the speculative work I did for ‘Mike’ who turned us down., because we still have to recover the cost of time we spent doing Mike’s piece of work. So the reality is your paying for your own speculative piece of work and for other people’s speculative piece of work! Sorry, I’m pointing aggressively!

Paul Boag speaking at Future of Web Design

Keir: I’m retracting quickly!

Marcus: I’m gonna get him a box to stand on!

Paul: But I get really annoyed about it and really passionate about it. I would never hire a company that does speculative design work because I’m paying for other people’s design work! It doesn’t make sense!

Keir: Moving swiftly on! (laughs) Going back to the original question! So there’s nothing exciting going on in the world of web?

Paul: Sorry, I’m very aware we’ve gone off on a tangent! There are two levels of excitement. There’s the Silicon Valley, web app type of excitement that everybody features. The cutting-edge, we’re-some-fancy-agency-startup-with-lots-of-venture-capital. And then you go to a conference and there are large companies that are ‘dealing with scalability with over a million hits!’, and you think to yourself ‘very interesting, but no kind of impact on my life’ – but over time that sort of cool stuff tends to trickle down, and I get excited at the next tier down. I get excited when I start to see some of that really cool stuff that maybe is old hat now, that everybody was talking about a year ago or maybe two years ago, when I start seeing that appearing on average websites. Websites that the vast majority of us are working on.

Keir: Can you give an example of something that has done that for you recently?

Paul: Just this whole web application culture of Javascript driven, application-like / desktop-like, because for such a long time that was only for things like Gmail and Google Maps and stuff like that, but now that’s all trickling down and you’re starting to see rich internet applications in boring everyday sites, whether it be a university site or you know, Sussex Police! Anna was telling me about a Police website where is you hear a police helicopter flying over you at night you can look it up the next day and find out why it was there and what it was doing! And all of those Web 2.0 things about openness and transparency as well as some of the technology stuff like AJAX, all of that stuff is now becoming mainstream. And I get excited when fringe stuff becomes mainstream, and the bigger community of developers outside of ‘The Valley’ all start doing it. That’s why I get excited about the web, and that’s why I get excited about stuff that everybody else was excited about a year or two years ago!

Mike: We wanted to move on to the subject of blogging. As a company I believe you don’t blog?

Paul: Not as a company no.

Mike: So you blog as Boagworld, but recently we’ve been intrigued to see you’ve been blogging more personally on Posterous so really we’re trying to work out, is Boagworld purely on the education side and those on your micro-blog are more personal? We were particularly struck by one article – what was the title? ‘The Idea of Personal Brands Stinks’, you use AudioBoo, you have a lot of outlets, how do you decide what goes where?

Paul: You’re making a fundamental mistake here!

Paul: I make many Paul!

Paul: The fundamental mistake you’re making is that you’re presuming that I have a strategy! Which I really really don’t!

Mike: The question should have been, what do you get out of blogging professionally and personally?

Paul: I’ve never been so professionally interviewed!

Keir: Apparently Anna can cut stuff out! It’s apparent that you might get work out of your blogging, I don’t know, but you obviously get more out of it than just that?

Paul: OK! Let me see if I can find a question in there somewhere!

Keir: We don’t do this for a living you know!

Paul: There’s a few things to comment on. First of all, without a doubt, blogging is a major marketing tool for Headscape. The vast majority of our new business comes in via that. It is definitely and categorically a business tool. But it didn’t start out that way. When I started out blogging, it was a little bit of ego – we went to @media 2005 and they got different bloggers to stand up and I thought ‘I want to be like that!’ so I get very inspired and I started blogging partly because of that. But I quickly realised no-one was interested in what I was writing at the time so the blog for me became this place where I could take what I was learning and picking up and rationalise it in a way that made sense to me. So it became a way of me wrapping me head around everything that was going on. It was also a way for me to be storing and holding the stuff I was learning because my memory is horrendous and to this day I find myself saying ‘I’m sure I’ve written something on that’ and I go onto my blog and it’s a way for me to remember. I know it sounds stupid but I really do this, and so I’ll read through my blog and say ‘OK, so that’s what I’m supposed to think about this!’ But it really helps to clarify my thinking – so that was a big part of it. But Boagworld, the domain was bought and I thought I’d write a bit about web design, it was my personal website, and as I wrote more about web design as my head was buzzing with that at the time as this was the time of Web Standards and we were getting into accessibility. And then other people started to take an interest in it and it grew and grew – and then we started the podcast which really came out of the fact that (a) I’d got an iPod for Christmas that was just about beginning to support podcasts, and so I looked for a web design one and there wasn’t one so I thought ‘I’ll do that’ because it’s easier than writing one and I’m crap at writing.

Marcus: (Shyly) Hello, it’s Paul, this is the first ever podcast!

Paul: (Laughs) Which is pretty much what it sounded like!!! It’s like stepping back in time listening to those early ones.

Keir: How long ago was that Paul?

Paul: 2005/2006? I’ll have to have a look. No, it must have been 2005. It was growing, it was building momentum until it eventually became this thing of it’s own. It was beginning to have marketing benefits and I was beginning to spend some of my work time doing this. So relatively recently I came to this realisation that Headscape had robbed me of my blog! Which I’m quite happy with as it’s turned into this great marketing tool which is fun to do and I love it. But I had nowhere to share, I dunno, a silly video of James or some cool thing that was nothing to do with web design or whatever else. So that’s where Posterous came from. It was just an easy way for me to talk about something that wasn’t web design. Occasionally bits of web design get in there – I’ll tell you my dirty little secret for this one, which is that often, if there’s an idea I’ve had, I’m too lazy to write a blog post about it, I’ll record a video. But I won’t put the video onto Boagworld as there’s an expectation that I’ll have a transcript of it to make it accessible, and so I just put it on Posterous to get around it which is really naughty and I should be ashamed of myself! But I do occasionally do that. But most of the time Posterous is just about me having fun. Then you get into things like AudioBoo – AudioBoo is my idea of micro-podcasting, like Twitter is micro-blogging. So it’s little snippets of tips and advice. So, how do I decide what goes on where?

Keir: You’re interviewing yourself now!

Mike: Let’s go and get some coffee! Marcus?

Paul: So basically, if it’s not good enough and not long enough to be a blog post, it’ll become and AudioBoo, that’s if it’s about web design. If it’s about web design and it’s too long for an AudioBoo, it’ll become a blog post. If it’s not about web design, it’s Posterous.

Keir: So you do have a strategy!?

Paul: But where it falls down is where I’ll do a little AudioBoo about something which is the beginning of a thought, then it ends up as a blog post and then it ends up on the podcast as well. So it kind of ripples through.

Keir: That’s cool – it’s interesting to know all that but what I’d personally like to know is what makes you want to share such personal stuff sometimes? I know you’re a Christian and you talk about God, but you also talk about some other personal stuff sometimes too? What is it in you that makes you want to do that?

Paul: I think it’s two things. It’s two major parts of my personality. One is that I am a massive extravert, I’m a massive show-off – I’m never happier than when I’ve got a massive audience. To be entirely frank, you know!

Keir: Had anyone spotted that?!

Paul: Unlike Marcus I can’t sing or play a musical instrument! The best I can do is jump up and down, wave my hands in the air and say ‘Look at Me!’ So there’s that aspect to it. I think there’s another aspect to it. Somebody said to me right when I was a young kid, they said Paul, the thing about you is that you live with your heart on your sleeve, what you see is what you get. And I still think I’m like that now. I’m a very open person. If I’m grumpy everyone knows I’m grumpy, if I’m happy everybody knows I’m happy. I live my life in the open and always have. So I do that online, because I’m not a different person online than I am offline, and I know a lot of people are, but I don’t choose to be that.

Keir: Thanks Paul, that’s a nice explanation.

Mike: OK, one of the questions we have is about honesty and speaking and blogging. Do you ever…

Paul: I make up stuff all the time!

Mike: But it’s very hard I think to always be honest, in all spheres of life. Do you feel you are always as honest as you are?

Paul: Does this go back to the conversation we were having previously Mike?

Mike: It does yeah.

Paul: Because we had this conversation, me and Mike about when you stand on the stage, and sometimes you get off after a presentation and sometimes you go ‘Why did I say that?’ and you think, ‘I said that because I think that’s what people expected me to say’ rather than what I was actually thinking. I mean you gave the example about where you gave a talk about sketching where you said ‘Get away from your computer and start sketching’ when that’s not actually what he does. (Laughs) Well it was either a case of share an example where I had done that and I would rather humiliate you than me!

Mike: Yeah, I wanna reverse that! Anna can apparently cut things out.

Paul: No, no, no editing. We tell people that but it’s a lie! And I’ve done similar things, I’ll be honest. For me where the line comes with honesty is, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with saying ‘I think this is the way it should be’ – but where you fall down and it gets a bit shady is where you say ‘I think this is the way it should be’ but fail to mention that you’re actually there yet, we’re heading in that direction. And I’ve made that mistake too. But I do try and be transparently honest – I don’t try and dress up anything that I talk about, and in fact I’m probably a bit self-deprecating actually. Actually I think a lot of people think I’m a bit of a joker and a bit of a moron. But I do like to simplify things and I do like to take the mystery out of things – I think there are a lot of people, and this goes back to our conversation, I think there are a lot of people making out like their job is a lot fancier, a lot harder than it actually is – and we do like to justify our own existence by using lots of clever words., and having ‘processes’ and ‘methodologies’ and ‘systems.’

Mike: Cool, thanks, that’s interesting. So coming on to status, how important do you think status is in the industry?

Paul: OK, well I’m glad you worded that question the way you did, as I was worried that you were going to word it ‘How important is status is to you?’, and you’d purposely put the question of honesty beforehand! (Laughs)

Keir: We were going to ask ‘How big is your ego?’ but then we’ve scribbled that out! But this also comes off the back of your article about personal branding; the idea of web celebrity, a lot of people would refer to you as one of those.

Paul: I’m going to be entirely honest about this right – which I don’t think a lot of people are. Yes, I love it.

All: (Laughs)

Paul: Of course I love it! Of course you’re going to love it when someone comes up to you and says ‘You’re Paul Boag aren’t you, I really love what you do!’ and anyone who pretends that they don’t like being praised is a liar.

Marcus: I’ve got quite a funny story actually. I went to the Comedy Store in Leicester Square last Friday evening, and we got there and sat in our seats, and there was this young couple, both of them in their early twenties came and sat down next to us for the first half. And I kept seeing this guy look at me, and I thought ‘He’s recognised me!’

All: (Laughs)

Marcus: Nothing was said! Interval comes, I get another beer and sit back down. And he said, ‘I think I know who you are’ and I was like…you’ve got it wrong!

Keir: You’re Paul Boag!

Marcus: But supporting what Paul’s saying, I get recognised at conferences. ‘Say something’ that’s what they always say.

Paul: Yeah!

Marcus: Especially Americans!

Marcus: So I said to one guy, ‘You’re a web designer are you?’ and he said ‘No, I think my Mum’s got one of your records!’

All: (Laughs)

Marcus: It’s gone full circle now. If it’s someone young I expect them to recognise me from the podcast.

Mike: Didn’t your daughter’s friend come up and say she knew you from the podcast?

Marcus: Yes, yes, it still amazes me, because I just pitch up once a week and try and make it look stupid!

Keir: What band were you in again?

Marcus: A band called ‘Breathe’

Keir: And now it’s ‘Stroke the Toad?’

Marcus: Now it’s Stroke the Toad.

Paul: Yeah, to say you don’t like that, I mean, I was at Thorpe Park recently with my youth group and we were queuing up and some guy came up to me and said ‘Are you Paul Boag?!’ and my youth group were wetting themselves, they thought it was hilarious! And yeah I like it, course I do! And people are really kind, they’re really nice about it – but you gotta keep it in perspective right? You know, I’m a niche of a niche of a niche of a niche. I might aspire to be Leo Laporte, and Leo Laporte might aspire to be a daytime TV presenter who aspires to be I dunno, a mainstream TV presenter who aspires to be a film thing and so it goes on. And it’s the whole premise – and I reject the premise – but it’s the premise that because you’re well known, and because a lot of people have heard of you, that in some way your life is of more value. And I think that’s the point I was trying to get across in the personal branding thing. There’s this friend of mine I grew up with who got married to this Indian guy, and she works out in India – we actually raised money for her on the podcast over Christmas – and runs an orphanage out there with a couple of hundred kids who have had their lives ruined. She does more good in a single day than I will do in my lifetime. And OK no-one knows about here, and no-one is interested in her, and I get people come up to me on the Tube?? And that’s ridiculous to me! And that’s what made me angry and that’s what made me want to do that post. And then it all gets out of proportion and it all gets silly. Where in our culture – sorry this is all getting a bit heavy! – where in our culture did we get to a point where Kevin Rose can’t stand in a blimmin’ party without being mobbed by people? You know, that’s weird? There’s something screwed up there.

Marcus: That’s not weird? That’s normal?!

Keir: I guess celebrity is changing? When I grew up fame was the pop stars, the rock stars and now you’ve got tech celebrities.

Marcus: If they had a rock star in that room they would get even more mobbed, but it still happens.

Paul: Just because it’s normal doesn’t make it not weird. Just because it’s been going on for a hundred years, doesn’t make it not weird.

Marcus: I’d say it’s human nature.

Paul: Yeah, and I’m saying human nature sucks!

Marcus: Well deal with it!

Keir: OK, so it has some benefits to you, but it is important?

Paul: In the industry?

Marcus: I’ve been thinking about this. Who’s the most famous web celeb? Zeldman maybe? People with big web projects and big budgets go to Happy Cog because of Zeldman’s celebrity. Not only that – he wouldn’t be famous if he didn’t know his stuff and talked well etc etc.

Paul: The sad fact is there are designers and developers and agencies out there that are as good as Happy Cog.

Marcus: Course there are.

Paul: And there are certainly ones that are better than us. But they don’t get the exposure because they are introverted people. It makes me sad but that’s the reality.

Keir: You actually said the other day in your video…

Paul: Oh don’t quote me back! I’m going to have to contradict myself!

Keir: You said the other day that you could be introverted and be just as successful.

Paul: Yeah, I think you can, but in a different way.

Marcus: What, in a non-successful way?! You can be as good a designer, as good a developer without being famous, but if you’re trying to win business using the Zeldman / Happy Cog argument then you’re going to be a lot better off if you’re somebody who’s known.

Paul: Yeah, but you could still be known and be an introvert. It’s indentifying the methods by which you’re known. For example, Rachel Andrew. Until relatively recently she didn’t do a huge amount of public speaking, and even now doesn’t do massive amounts. But she’s written book after book after book after book. She’s known for that writing and that has given her the profile. You could be an introvert and blog, and have one of the best blogs in the world. You could be submitting gorgeous designs to CSS galleries and be winning work that way. So it doesn’t need to be by being mouthy and extrovert.

Keir: The funny thing is there are agencies out there that are as good as each other – some might win work because of their public persona, and then there are those who win work because they constantly put out a really high standard of work.

Marcus: There are others that might win work because they have a really pushy salesman! It’s just another way of marketing yourself or your company.

Paul: To be honest, look at yourself Mike. OK, you’ve done a couple of speaking slots, but you haven’t spoken a huge amount. But your work has been picked up by people, and people have gone ‘Wow, I really like that’ and that’s spread virally without you jumping up and down like I do going ‘Look at Me!’ So it’s perfectly possible, it’s just a different way of doing it.

Keir: Another question that’s worth asking is that a lot of people have become well down for their niche – recently you’ve been talking a lot about educating clients, Mike has talked a lot about creativity and where he gets ideas from., they tend to be offline. Andy Clarke talks a lot about progressive CSS, CSS3 that sort of thing, for someone who is looking to get their face known in the industry is that something they should do? Find something they’re really interested in and just push it out?

Paul: Absolutely. I remember much nearer the beginning I’d built up a popular podcast that a lot of people listened to and were passionate about. But I couldn’t get speaking opportunities. And I think it was Ryan actually, who was honest enough to talk to me about it and it was his response that was ‘I don’t know what it is that you do?’ – a lot of people don’t know what it is I do! But

Keir: That’s a whole other interview Paul!

Paul: He didn’t know what box to put me in. People like putting other people in boxes.

Mike: It makes picking speakers easy to be honest.

Paul: So you can go, ‘We need someone in this slot who’s going to talk about business’ or ‘development’ or whatever else. I packaged myself very specifically for conferences and speaker opportunities, I will talk about this kind of stuff. Once you’ve done it once, that’s it. But, the problem is you can’t do that forever. You need to re-invent yourself. Jeremy Keith is very good at that. He started off as the DOM scripting guy, then he became the microformats guy, now he’s the HTML5 guy. He knows how to move from thing to thing. He would say that his interests change and he moves on, it might be, it might be a totally subconscious thing, but it’s a damn clever thing, however you slice it.

Marcus: I would argue that this applies to life, not just web design. I’ve got quite big kids now, and I’ve been saying to them for years now relating this to subjects that they are studying, do what you like doing, not what you think you ought to be doing. It applies across the board. If you can do something well, you are going to enjoy doing it.

Keir: Yeah, that will come out when you speak about it, in the passion.

Paul: OK?! Finished with us?!

Marcus: You’ve got a whole podcast here! At least 45 minutes!

Paul: OK, well thanks very much for listening to Boagworld, we’ll see you again next week!

Keir: Thanks a lot!

Thanks goes to Andy Wickes for transcribing this interview.

Why I don't get SEO

I don’t get why people invest in SEO. I am not trying to start an argument. I just want to explain my doubts so somebody can correct me.

I like to think of myself as an intelligent guy. I have worked on the web since 1994 and like to stay informed. However, over that time I have never understood website owners’ obsession with SEO.

Many organisations invest vast sums of money in SEO companies that promise to improve their rankings. Although SEO can make a difference, I am far from convinced it is the best way to spend your marketing budget.

Below are five reasons why I have my doubts. My hope is that people can convince me I am wrong in the comments. We shall see.

A continual investment with no guarantees

The thing with SEO is that it is not a one-off cost like many believe. It is not just a matter of getting to be number one for your chosen keywords, its about staying there too. This involves an ongoing investment.

Also unlike pay-per-click (PPC) advertising there are no guarantees. There are SEO companies who guarantee you the top spot, but they are lying. You pay your SEO company in the hope they can improve your placement, but a good SEO company will not commit to how much.

It is a bit like buying a newspaper ad, but being given no guarantee as to what page it will appear on or how big the ad will be.

Classified ads in a newspaper

Image Source

At least with PPC you know how much you will pay and what you get in return.

You’re manipulating the system

My second concern is that essentially SEO is about playing the system. Google exists to connect its users with the information they require. They have a sophisticated algorithm to do that. It is also an algorithm that is getting better all of the time.

SEO on the other hand is about creating as much exposure for your website as possible. They do this by guessing what the Google algorithm does and using that in your site’s favour.

The problem is that the algorithm is unknown to anybody other than Google and it changes all of the time.

Hacking Circuits

Image Source

To me it seems more sensible to work with Google’s known goal – to provide great content to its users, rather than trying to manipulate a system we do not fully understand.

Instead of spending money on SEO, spend it on producing better content that provides Google’s users with more value.

It can damage the user experience

I am not saying that SEO does not work. I am saying that it is not worth the cost. That cost is not just in terms of money spent on SEO. It is also in user experience.

I have worked with a number of SEO companies over the years (at the request of our clients) and it has always ended up damaging the user experience.

For example, SEO often leads to an excessive amount of copy, changes to the code order (that creates problems for screen readers) and keyword heavy navigation (which reduces scanability).

Example of keyword stuffing

SEO may increase the level of traffic to your site. However, it often undermines the conversion rate.

It is a passive form of marketing

It is not just SEO I have a problem with, it is the emphasis on search engines.

Website owners seem obsessed with being ‘number one’ on Google. However, it is not a particularly effective method of marketing.

Search engines are passive because they require the searcher to have a pre-existing need for your product or service. On one hand this makes search more targeted because it only reaches people who are interested in your product. On the other, it does not allow you as a marketeer to create a need or raise the profile of a new brand or product.

Father and son sleeping on a counch

Image Source

When compared to social media or other forms of advertising, investing in SEO seems very passive.

It carries no weight

My final problem with SEO is that it lacks the weight of personal recommendation. By focusing on SEO you are merely shaping your site to cater for an algorithm. You are not making your website appeal to people.

Trying out http://www.flairbuilder.com on the recommendation from @boagworld

Instead, I would invest in making your site better for users and encouraging them to recommend it through social networks and linking. This puts the weight of personal recommendation behind your site and we all know that word of mouth is the most effective form of advertising.

Conclusions

Let me say it one more time – I am not questioning whether SEO works. However, it is my belief there are better ways of spending your money.

I believe investing in your users brings a substantially better return. It increases conversion, encourages word of mouth recommendation and ultimately improves your ranking through links back to your site.

My recommendation to clients is that we build their websites to be accessible to search engines but tailored towards users not search engines.

The question is – am I wrong in that advice, and if so why? Enlighten me in the comments.

Creating your first web application

Drew Mclellan and Rachel Andrew share their experiences of launching their first app (Perch). They talk about their successes and failures focusing particularly on the business, marketing and customer support challenges.

Paul : Drew and Rachel so you you launched something called Perch.

Perch

Drew : Yes

Paul : It would be great to hear a little bit about what you guys do your background and a little bit about Perch and maybe some of the things you did right and wrong and the process of creating a webapp and all that kind of stuff. But before we get to that there is a question, I am going to ask two questions to every guest that comes on the show one at the beginning of their interview and one at the end OK? So you are the first to answer this question and I am going to pick on Drew first so Drew is going to have to go first. What the question is Drew is ..

Drew : Yes

Paul : In your history working as a web designer, if fact lets not keep it to just web design, in your life as a whole what is the biggest cock-up you have made.

Rachel:[laughs]

Drew : probably I could think of a couple

Rachel:Daily

Drew : Yes [all laugh] thank you. Probably the biggest was actually a sort of user interface design error

Paul : right

Drew : on my part, I was working a a design agency which probably ought to remain nameless and I was sought of the lead developer there and I was asked to build a machine to send out spam basically, newsletters to the subscribers of a site the agency ran as so I duly built this thing it was in classic ASP back in the day and it had a nice form on the front where you filled in the subject line put the content of your email then there was a option and I thought it would be really user friendly to enable the person who was sending the email [Marcus makes background noise with the boagworld iphone app]

Paul : Oh Marcus!

Marcus : I can’t turn the volume off

Paul : It is not that difficult

Drew : anyway I though it would be really great, as a really fantastic usability feature to enable the person who is writing the email to send a test email to themselves, before sending it out to the list so you know they can see what the email is going to look like

Paul : Yes

Drew : Fine so I did that and unfortunately I did not spend much time making the UI look really clear, we handed this over to the director of the company who’s name was Arthur and he though he would try this out and wrote his test email which said “Arthur smells” but unfortunately because of my UI design cock-up he managed to send that out to the entire list of customers [laughter from everyone] but what was really great about was the responses we got for months following asking how Arthur’s odour situation was and if he had learnt to take showers ?

Paul : Yes that is a pretty good one I will give you that, that is a good example. rachel can you top that this is the question.

Rachel:I have my example of my own stupidity which has nothing to do with the web. Before I started working in the web I was working backstage in the west end as stage crew and managed to stop an entire west end show with my maglite [laughs] We had sort of two enormous big spiral staircase truck things that trundled in from the wings and they were on a track on stage and had a big spade you had to haul out and I am looking down this hole with a big maglite in my mouth and let go it goes down the track under the stage floor and jams up the revolve and stops the show [laughs]

Paul : That is fairly impressive,

Rachel:how embarrassed was I

Paul : I am very impressed by that

Rachel:but as a girl on stage crew they are always looking for a chance to give you a slap anyway so

Paul : Definitely that is pretty severe, OK so let’s get onto important stuff tell us about EdgeofMySeat what you do there, how it came about Yes let’s start with that and then go from there.

Drew : Well that’s one for Rachel really she started everything up

Rachel:Yes I started the company in 2001, way back in the day I had been working for dot com companies and really thought I could probably do things better on my own

Paul : We all thought that

Rachel:It was just at the end of the dot com silliness and it wasn’t looking good my daughter was three and a half and it was looking increasingly unstable where I was and I thought hang on I can probably maker enough money to survive on my own, so that is what I did and have been ever since. We specialise in doing development work for design agencies, most of our work is for design agencies and we do the back end development and it is mainly PHP these days we used to do all sorts of things but it mainly is PHP these days.

Paul : So how did you get the point of deciding you wanted to build an app, because that is a big jump if you have come from the background of you know you have been building stuff for other people to then get to a you know right we are going to build a app. What happened there?

Drew : Part of that I think is because the web is what we do there is always just a little dissatisfaction in building things for other people you have always got the ambition to do something yourself so I think part of it was sort of a need to actually just to do something that was ours and putting effort into something that was actually belong to us not just belong to a client but the other thing is as a small company from a business point of view we charge out at an hourly rate whilst there are two of us there is sort of a limit to the number of hours we can work in a day we don’t want to spend you know seven days a week twenty four hours a day working and even if we did that we could not go to twenty five hours, we are putting a cap on the amount of business we can do. So part of it from a company point of view is this idea that we could develop a different sort of revenue stream. So something that rather than selling an hour to a client we actually sell a product to someone and we can sell that product to lots and lots of people without having to invest more time in each sale

Paul : yes, very sensible

Drew : So that was sort of the direction we were coming from with that

Paul : So when you were going through this process looking back now at the process, what you build and launching it and then what happened afterwards give us some stuff about what you felt you did right and stuff that you felt you did wrong in the process.

Drew : What do you think Rach, what did we do right

Rachel:[laughs] I think we knew the market very well, although perch is developed for different sites than we normally work on, we have a big CMS product really that we only sell with our services that we install it for people so it is a very similar market just smaller sites generally and sites that do not have as much stuff and as much content to manage whatever it is still that same sort of market and we knew the key things that people wanted to do. They are the same really as people who are using our big CMS want to be able to do, but also it was the time implication of being able to install something very very quickly that did not mean you had to build your entire site around it. So these were things we knew that would make things easier, make peoples life easier in fact our lives easier even though we tend to get these big projects we tend to get things for existing clients where they day ooh we just have this little site but they want to be able to edit this bit here

Paul : Yes, so you did the classic thing of you built something for yourselves basically

Rachel:Yes we kind of knew that we would need it but also talking to other people we though hang on this is something other people need and people were sort of hacking around WordPress or whatever which is not always ideal for the sort of thing we are talking about.

Drew : So yes we both built something that we needed for ourselves and also we stuck to what we know

Paul : Yes

Drew : you know we do a lot of CMS development and so what we have done is developed a small CMS, it is not a complete change from what we do it is not new ground for us it is stuff we are very very familiar with and that means we can do it really really well and really cost effectively

Paul : Yes that makes perfect sense so the question is what did you do wrong, what went wrong in the process that other people can maybe learn from?

Marcus : Nothing at all

Paul : it was perfect from beginning to end

Drew : from a development point of view there is a massive difference that we discovered from developing a site and being in control of how it is deployed you know what sort of server it goes onto and being the person you know you as the developer are the person that puts things live and makes sure it is all running and everything, that’s quite straight forward. There is a massive difference to developing some software and giving it to people for them to go and install on their own server

Paul : Yes

Drew : and you don’t know what that server might be, you know we don’t know what operating system it is going to be running it could be a mac it could be linux it could be some other sort of unix it could be windows, ermhh perch is written in php which is fairly portable but there are subtle differences and there are different configuration options
t’s a whole world of tiny tiny little changes which you can’t account for but which we probably could have accounted for a little bit better than we did with hindsight, the very first update we put out addressed a massive number of tiny tiny changes and we very quickly got onto track with that yes you know it is pretty straight forward on any server but we certainly learnt a few lessons about running PHP on windows in those early days.

Rachel:Oh yes we know al-sorts now about running PHP on windows now and I think as well just the reliability of people’s servers, we tend to work with decent hosts we know decent hosts, the big projects we do we put those on servers we know are absolutely fine and will run and there will not be any problems, you know people have the flakiest of flakiest hosting it is really unbelievable the sort of stuff people are deploying client sites onto.

Paul : Hmmm

Rachel:You know you cannot rely on the database being there at every request

Marcus : A bit like the boagworld site

Rachel:[laughs]

Marcus : up until recently

Paul : Up until two days ago

Rachel:you know there is a awful lot of stuff that you have yo build into something that you are going to send out to people just to cope with the fact that the hosting, you can’t rely on the hosting being decent the database actually being there, it’s like stuff you think you could rely on and yeah people do not want to be told they are going to have to change your host, one of the things we made a decision early on was that it was going to be PHP5 and we still get people even though php4 has been end of lifed, but I have to use php4 my host only supports php4 and in that we really just say, you know it has been end of lifed if you host can’t give you a PHP5 account at this point there is a problem you want change you host

Marcus : change your host

Rachel:you know but that is the sort of thing you are up against it is that people are running old phps and whatever.

Paul : I remember recording an interview with you at future of web design which we still haven’t released, we got so many interviews that day it is a bit overwhelming

Marcus : Probably all covering the same thing

Paul : Yes I think it is pretty much but that’s OK, One of the things that I remember saying to you in that interview is what, why were you at future of web design why have a stall there and you talked about making it clear that it wasn’t a side project it was something you we’re really committed to, why tell erhh why do you think that is so important I guess is the question because a lot of people work on side projects you know, the web design community is full with applications that have been released as something along side their main point of work.

Drew : Yes I think people do do that and for all the right reasons people will do a little side project and they may do something like take a week of from normal client work to do something or they might just take a couple of days and put something out and quite often those things, the point of those side projects is in the exercise of building it and trying out a new way of working as a team

Paul : sure

Drew : or trying out some new technology, and it is about the process of doing that side project and it is not always about

Paul : right

Drew : the end product, and that is the point of it, which is absolutely brilliant but we wanted to be clear that this is not that sort of project we haven’t just built perch as a exercise in making a little content management system and we are not that bothered about it it is actually something we are very serious about and so I think it is important that people get that you know get that impression and realise this is another branch of our business, it is a real thing it is supported and

Rachel:and it is going to be upgraded we are going to be adding to it and you know it is not something that we are just going to get fed up with I think that is really important and that people know if they buy a copy we are going to be able to support it and we are going to be there and we are not going to sort of decide one day, you know are no we have had enough of this, it is important and is very much a part of what we do.

Paul : So tell us a little bit about the marketing and promotion and how perch has you know been promoted I guess how have you got the word out there about it ?

Drew : Primarily so far it has been via twitter

Paul : Ok

Drew : That has really been the main, the main source of traffic initially and that is where, I would not say we have put a lot of effort in but we have been mentioning it on twitter and we set up an account for perch, which is grabaperch on twitter and we sort of tweet out little ideas occasionally, promo codes and link to people’s sites which they have built which is a good example and that sort of thing and so it has really just been we started of spreading word of mouth that way and then we were a sponsor at Dconstruct down in Brighton this year and so we had a little stall there and banners and badges to give away and really our idea with Dconstruct was perhaps the people attending it might not be our direct customers. I think the sort of audience for Dconstruct are probably a little bit you know more involved web designers perhaps a bit more experienced and the sort of people we are probably targeting with perch are more people doing very very small projects maybe not working in a big agency perhaps they are just working on their own doing little individual things or they are a freelancer, but we thought maybe the audience at Dconstruct were perhaps influencers to those people and we would sort of get the word out that way

Paul : Right

Drew : So that is one thing we have tried

Paul : Did it work

Drew : It is always really difficult to measure especially when we are going for that sort of approach of trying to get perch known to influencers, it is then very difficult to see how that trickles down to actual users is hard to define,

Paul : yes

Drew : but in terms of marketing have we got the word out I think we are certainly starting to

Paul : yeah

Drew : yeah I think [laughs]

Rachel:Yeah we’re web developers not marketers and we are not, our general services really we don’t have to advertise, we are fortunate enough and established enough that we get, our work comes via word of mouth which is wonderful but I think with a product you do actually have to market it and you do have to advertise it and so that is something we are having to learn has we have never been in that situation before.

Paul : and how has that, how has that gone because it is a difficult thing if you have never done it before you know and you would not consider yourselves natural marketers ? That’s a major problem when you are producing a product it is kind of getting that exposure

Rachel:I think that we are fairly lucky in you know we both write and we speak at things and so we have been able to use our own personal networks to some extent and also we are kind of excited about it we really like it so we are very happy to talk about it at things so that I think really helps being enthusiastic about your own stuff

Paul : What about all the other bits and pieces that go along side, so you have built this application that was the easy bit in someways, because that was the bit you knew I am guessing

Drew : yes

Rachel:hmm

Paul : and then you are faced with a whole plethora of additional problems like you know I have got to market this, I have to deal with refunds, I have got to deal with you know customer support all of those kind of stuff what kind of lessons have you learnt from doing that kind of thing

Drew : Yeah we deal with paypal, for support we use a webapp called Tender, which is a hosted support service

Tender

Rachel:It has been brilliant yes

Drew : and thats really great because one thing Tender does is it integrates with your sites login

Paul : ah right

Drew : so basically as long as you point like a subdomain of your site, so we use support.grabaperch.com and we point that at Tender’s servers because it is on grabaperch.com we ca set a cookie when a person logs into their account on our site which then automatically logs them onto the support site so we are not requiring customers to have one login to access their licenses and one login to access support it’s all integrated

Paul : and what was that called Tenderapp?

Drew : yes it is called Tender, so it it tenderapp.com I think

Paul : Ok we will have a look at that in just a second when I can bring up the url

Drew : Yes that is pretty good

Paul : So what is that, that er deals with all your support requests is that basically what is happening?

Drew : Yes it is basically a mix between a ticketing system and a forum in that it’s, so the tickets can be open so people can browse and find problems that people have had before and hopefully find, as time goes on they might find the answer to their problem already posted so they do not even have to ask it or if not they can ask and it has the option of making things private as well so if you need to ask something where you need to talk about the specifics of your server and you are not comfortable with that being public then you can make that private

Paul : oh OK that’s good

Rachel:it has been good, we have been really impressed with that it has been excellent as a service.

Drew : and the other thing that has been a big thing because normally as a agency we deal with invoicing clients we do that doing you know a few invoices a month because we tend to work on big projects so that’s fairly easy but when it comes to selling and potentially having to do multiple invoices every single day, you might be talking having to do you know hundreds over a month suddenly you have to think about that how do you deal with your accounts and fortunately before we did perch we had actually moved our accounting system out of, what were we using before quickbooks?

Rachel:I was using quickbooks yes

Drew : out of quickbooks onto

Rachel:[laughs]

Marcus : what were we using, I was using quickbooks

Rachel:yes, yeah I will tell you who does the accounting

Drew : yes er Rachel was using quickbooks and now rachel is using xero.com which is basically an online accounting package which is

Rachel:which is absolutely marvellous, even before the perch issue I don’t know how I would have dealt with it, we would have had to take someone on to deal with the data entry with perch if I had still been using quickbooks and we have an accountant but as a business owner i kind of like doing my own book keeping as I feel I keep an handle on things I like doing that, it doesn’t take me that long and I had moved into xero which is just fantastic it is so easy to do all the day to day stuff book keeping and there is bank feeds and things, the cool thing with perch is we then, erh xero have got an api

xero

Paul : ahhh

Drew : this is where I get really excited about accounting

Paul : [laughs]

Drew : our accounting system has a api

Rachel : so we can just sling those purchases the details, the customer details and all the VAT information crucially into xero and then I just need to go through and just check they are correct and approve them, which saves so much time

Drew : the other thing that xero does is then it links up with paypal dealing with that as if it was a normal bank account

Paul : oh nice

Drew : as we sell by paypal the invoices come in from our sales, oh I don’t know the accounting terms, one lot of things come in from paypal one lot of things come in from our website and rachel says yep they are the same they match

Paul : I can see know why you deal with the accounting Rachel

Rachel:yes

Paul : [laughs]

Rachel:yes it is one of my jobs [laughs] but I know , but xero if people are struggling with book keeping and accounting systems I would I really would recommend checking it out they have been fantastic

Paul : oh that is good, so oh You going to say something Marcus?

Marcus : No I was just going to say we have had similar issues, finance type issues with getsignoff and paypal, just awkwardness really

Paul : yes

Marcus : so I will pass on your thoughts to er

Paul : well this is really the guy we have to talk to as Ryan is now the man

Marcus : so true yes he is master of getsignoff

Paul : so getsignoff you have got to check to xero.com

Ryan : x – e – r – o .com ?

Paul : yes apparently it looks like it might be very useful, because we you know payment is a big thing, especially things like have you had to deal much with things like refunds, discounting and all those kind of things, because you talked about discount codes earlier

Drew : yes well one of the promotional things is we have printed out a load of moo cards and those moo cards have all got unique discount codes on them, which give people 20% off and we hand those out a conferences and what have you, so we had to building the shopping cart side of things was sort of that is what we do so being able to apply discount to an item before sending it through to paypal that was quite straight forward, it requires a little bit of thought to make sure you get that right but that in itself was quite straightforward

Paul : Yes OK fair enough

Rachel:the other thing to think about if anyone is thinking of selling products and things online is the VAT issue and I spent so much time on the phone to the revenue saying am I doing this right is this right, because you have got to deal with people in Europe who have not got VAT numbers so don’t need to pay VAT and people in the states who don’t pay VAT and people in the UK who have got VAT numbers but still pay VAT. You have got to deal with VAT correctly because if you don’t and get a long way down the line they are going to send you a very big bill at some point. So that is another issue of selling things like this is you do need to be careful of VAT and sort of local taxes and I imagine it is the same in the states with their tax issues

Paul : hmm I mean it is interesting isn’t it how much is involved in creating a web app you think you are just going to you know well I know how to code stuff I know how to build stuff, it opens up this whole realm of additional stuff afterwards that is the pain and misery.

Drew : yes you are right, writing the software was the easy bit [laughs] that did not take long at all and then I thought right I am ready to release this I had better make a website for it and then you start thinking about the fact you have got to have obviously all your product information so we had to start thinking about how do we describe what this is how do we show people, how do we put forward it’s good points all that sort of marketing and sales stuff

Marcus : Brand type stuff , I mean Perch has got a brand hasn’t it wether you like it or not, there are things that are associated with it you had to decide on, or at least recognise it I guess

Drew : Yes

Marcus : which then needs to be translated into the design etc etc

Drew : exactly then we had to figure out what the shopping basket type things user accounts what information do we need to collect what do we need for our accounting purposes what do we need in order to contact people ermh and then how do we let people manage their stuff so just the website in itself was a reasonable size project, which I sought of happened upon without really thinking about it

Rachel:[laughs]

Drew : so yes writing the code really is the easy bit

Paul : so what advice would you give to people who are in that same kind of situation where they are creating a web app, they come form a similar background to you they are web designers and developers, you know what’s the golden rule, what really are the things people need to focus on ?

Drew : I guess people need to decide whether it is something they decide they are going to turn into a business, as in do they actually want to make money from it, erm if they are going tot make money from it that takes, there are a whole load of extra complications which you have to account for, which will go away as soon as it is something you are just doing for fun

Paul : yes

Drew : and I would probably also say these days if you are thinking you are going to make money from it you need to plan how you are going to make money from it and kind of design that in so even if you are free when you launch to manage user expectations so people know it is free at the moment

Paul : for a limited time yeah

Drew : so I think that is really important to decide what are your aims is this something you actually want to turn into a bit of a business or is it just for fun and the experience of doing it

Paul : Sure

Drew : that would be the main one I don’t know

Paul : that’s fine that’s absolutely great, I mean this is all very relevant to us as we are in the process of turning Getsignoff from a side project into a business in it’s own right so all this stuff is brilliant and we have already talked about, well you and Ryan have talked about tenderapp and various other things and I think it is really useful and I think there are a lot of people who are out there basically considering doing the same thing, that they have an idea for an app and they want to do it and it shows it is not the quick easy solution that everyone thinks it is. I think there isa lot of people who thought I am fed up working with clients I want away from clients and have not really thought through the fact that they are replacing one set of problems for another set of problems and actually they are going from half a dozen clients to potentially thousands of little clients.

Rachel:and it is the amount, you have to account particularly if you are doing other client work as well as we are you then have to account in your schedule for a certain amount of dealing with support for instance and pre-sales queries and especially for a low price product if you spend you know what is not unusual an hour or two supporting a single customer which does actually happen that is a awful lot of your billable time used up in doing that. What we tend to find with perch is that people come back and buy repeat licenses and then of cause the support implication drops because they have already done it once.

Paul : right

Rachel:and they have worked out all the problems and they tend not to have to come back and ask more questions and of course there are a huge amount of people we never hear from at all, they get it they install it and it is absolutely fine. But for instance if someone is having, particularly in the early days someone is having problems with the server and something really weird is going on and we are trying to help them find out what is going on, because obviously it is going to be better for all our customers if we find out what the problem is and solve it in the software that can take up quite a lot of time and I think if you are really surviving on hour by hour client work you need to make sure you have got the time while you are building the customer base to afford to do that.

Paul : Yes OK well that was very interesting do you know we are a 12th of the way through the podcast everyone [cheers], which I feel is a major turning point.

Thanks goes to Shaun Hare for transcribing this segment.

5 Lists Every Website Owner Should Keep

A post about lists – life doesn’t get anymore exciting than that! Admittedly lists are not the most exciting of subjects but if you are a website owner they could make or break your website. Find out how.

I know, a list of important lists. With a post like this I could just tear the fabric of space time. However stay with me, it might be more interesting than it sounds.

To be honest with you I am obsessed by lists. I keep lists for everything. It’s a problem, I need help. However despite that, I have discovered that when it comes to running a website a few carefully selected lists can be incredibly helpful.

What follows is my list of lists that could make or break your website.

Reoccurring tasks

Let’s start with the most obvious list first – a reoccurring task list. This is a list of those tasks that you need to do on a regular basis to ensure your website is effective. What exactly those tasks are will depend on the type of website you run. However, my list for the sites I run include:

  • Participating in the forum daily
  • Posting blog posts regularly (see below)
  • Sending a monthly email newsletter
  • Recording my daily audioboo
  • Dealing with email enquiries
  • Reviewing site statistics

Your list will include other items. For example I advise that most websites do regularly usability testing (see below).

A reoccurring task list is important because it reminds you that a website needs constant attention. It prevents the site from slipping down your priorities or being pushed out by other work.

Blog subjects

Whether you call it a blog or a news section, most websites have some area dedicated to regularly updated content. However, these sections are often not updated. This is not because the website owner forgets, but because they struggle to generate ideas for content.

Its hard to think up blog posts on the spur of the moment. However ideas will come to you, if you are constantly keeping an eye out for them. That is where your blog subject list comes in.

Blog ideas occur to me all the time. When I am reading a book, watching TV or even in the shower. Rarely am I able to sit down and write a post there and then. That is why I keep a list of blog ideas. I know by the time I come to write something, all of those great ideas will have been forgotten.

My Blog Ideas List

For example this post came from my blog subject list. When I sat down to write this post I didn’t need to come up with an idea. It was already there.

You can make your life even easier by written a few notes on the ideas you have. Then you have even less thinking to do when it comes to writing the post. Again using this post as an example, I already had my 5 lists written down.

Feature ideas

One thing web designers complain about is scope creep. They hate the fact that website owners keep adding new features when a website is being built.

However if you think about it, that is not surprising. When you are building a website you are thinking a lot about the project. It is only natural that you mind comes up with lots of possible ideas.

Rather than dismiss these ideas for lack of time or money, add them to your feature list. This is essentially a wish list of things you might possibly want to do one day.

Boagworld task list

Once your current project is launched you can look at the wish list and work out what to do next.

Not only does this prevent scope creep but it also encourages an ongoing investment in your website.

Marketing opportunities

We all know that websites need promotion. However, it can often be hard to think of how best to promote them. When the moment arrives to do something about promoting our sites, all of our great ideas leave us.

Keeping a marketing list is a great way to combat this problem. If you find a website that covers a similar topic to you, make a note on your list to contact them and ask if you can write for them. Equally if you meet somebody at a conference who could promote your site, make a note to follow up that relationship.

Man holding a sign saying: I am looking for a wife please stop and talk to me

Whatever the marketing idea, write it down. It is then available for when you can act on it. This reduces the mental effort of coming up with ideas. Instead of thinking about how you could market your website, all you have to do is spot opportunities that arise naturally.

Fixes list

Our final list is a fixes list. This will include a mixture of bugs and usability issues.

In his latest book ‘Rocket Surgery Made Easy‘ Steve Krug recommends that you carry out light weight usability testing once a month. This will generate a significant number of usability issues that need resolving.

When combined with browser bugs this amounts to a considerable number of fixes. By adding all of these elements to a fixes list you achieve two objectives. First you ensure nothing is forgotten. Second you can priorities what needs addressing first based on the seriousness of the problem.

Without a list of this nature you can easily become overwhelmed by the complexity and number of issues that need resolving.

Are lists sexy?

Are lists sexy? Of course not. However, they will help you maintain a firm grasp on your websites development, remove the mental load of generating new ideas and ensure nothing gets missed. That may not be sexy but it is effective.

199. Time to generalise

This week on Boagworld: The changing role of web designers, Colin Firth on content and Becky Jones talks about the changes at Google.

Play

Download this show.

Launch our podcast player

Having trouble listening to 199?

Housekeeping

Next week is our 200th show! Hard to believe isn’t it.

To celebrate this momentous achievement we are going to do a 12 hour live podcast marathon.

The show starts at 10AM on Friday the 12th February and finishes at 10PM that evening (times are UK based). We have too many guests to mention, but lets just say you will not be disappointed!

To listen to the live show go to boagworld.com/live/.

Obviously we will not be recording the whole show but hopefully will release edited highlights over the coming weeks.

Back to top

News

SVG is back?

There are a lot of articles this week about SVG. A List apart describes SVG as…

Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) consist of circles, rectangles, and paths created in XML and combined into drawings on web pages. You can apply solid colors, gradients, and a sophisticated number of filters to SVG—although not all browsers implement all filter types. You can incorporate text, as well as images, and you can copy and clone your SVG as much as you want. Mostly, we use SVG for graphics programs, charts, illustrations, or animations.

In principle SVG has always sounded like an exciting tool. However it became a casualty of the browser wars, where support was patchy at best.

It also was somewhat surpassed by Adobe Flash, that became the standard for vector based graphics.

However, browser support has significantly improved and so we are seeing more interest in the technology again. This week alone there are articles on both A List Apart and Sitepoint.

Although it is interesting to read what SVG can do, I have to confess I do not understand the continued interest in this technology. I admit I am no expert on the subject, but it strikes me be that SVG is somewhat pointless for three reasons…

  • It’s still not supported natively in Internet Explorer. Although there are ways of overcoming this, it is a significant barrier to adoption.
  • The near universal adoption of flash makes this a far more obvious choice. Also, now that Adobe have opened up the platform many of the old arguments against flash are less relevant.
  • All modern browsers now support page zoom and so there is less need for a technology whose primary benefit is its ability to scale.

Perhaps I am missing the point and if so please correct me in the comments. However, the only ray of hope I see for SVG is Apples stubborn refusal to add flash support to devices like the iPod Touch, iPhone and iPad.

The best products sell themselves

When I saw the title of Andy Budd’s latest post ‘The Best Products Sell Themselves‘ I was ready to disagree with him.

I thought Andy was going to claim that if you have a great product you do not have to promote it. I thought he was going to argue that in the age of social networking, word of mouth recommendation was enough.

Instead I read a passionate article about providing a delightful experience that inspired and challenged me…

To sell products in a networked world, you need to differentiate yourself by more than just brand attributes and a check-list of features. You need to create remarkable products that rise above the competition and get noticed. Products that your users will rate, recommend and tweet about. In fact, what you need to create isn’t a product at all, but an experience.

He goes on to write…

Mediocrity just doesn’t cut it anymore. Instead, we need to create products that sell themselves. Does this mean that marketing no longer has a place in the networked society? Far from it. Marketers often understand customer needs and pain points better than anybody. In fact, this can sometimes be the cause of frustration in itself. I know plenty of people (myself included) who’ve been wooed by the notion of integrated phone, TV and Internet services only to find yourself dealing with completely separate business units and billing systems. The marketers were ahead of the curve. It’s the product that was lagging behind.

The idea of delighting your users by going above and beyond expectations is something that has been very much on my mind at the moment. It is something I am keen to introduce more into the work we produce at Headscape. Andy’s article could therefore not have been more timely.

I am reading a book at the moment called Made to Stick. In this book it gives the example of a departmental store that prides itself on delighting its customers. They give two examples in the book. The first was a member of staff who ironed the shirt for a customer going to a business meeting. The second was of clerk who gift wrapped items bought from a competitors store.

This is the kind of exceptional service website owners should be incorporating into their websites, and web designers should be providing their clients.

The principle of proximity in web design

I seem to be featuring a lot of posts on the basics of design recently. I think this is for several reasons…

  • Everybody involved in the web has to do some elements of design.
  • There are a lot of people listening to the show who are just starting out.
  • The website owners listening need to understand design principles if they are to work with a designer.

This week’s contribution to the cause is ‘The Principles of Proximity in Web Design.’ It is essentially a post on layout. It takes principles that have existed for a long time in print and applies them to the web.

It is a solid introduction to layout and tackles issues such as:

  • Whitespace
  • Visually grouping elements
  • Creating visual hierarchy
  • Improving scanability
  • The use of grids
  • Leading the user

The article concludes by summing up the benefits of understanding these principles…

Proper visual hierarchy by way of proximity helps users delve deeper into your website without worrying about where they’ve been or where they’re going.

They’ll always feel comfortable, and they’ll get to the most important sections of your website quickly and efficiently.

A worthwhile read for anybody new to design and a useful reminder to those of us who are old hands.

Google is changing and it will affect your website

Have to noticed that Google has been changing a lot recently? Probably not. You may have noticed the fade effect on the homepage. However, there are many more subtle and yet significant changes going on.

In an article for boagworld Becky Jones outlines some of these changes and how they may affect your website.

Changes include the introduction of…

  • Real time results
  • Breadcrumbs
  • Personalised search (even when not logged in)
  • Regions
  • Search features in the search bar
  • Anchor links in search results

What is significant about the list above is that they each have an influence on your rankings.

These changes really are turning the world of SEO upside down and having an influence on how websites are built.

However, what interests me the most is the new prominence of real time results. With posts from Twitter being placed at the top of listings, this makes social media a crucial component of search engine optimisation.

If you care about your website’s ranking (which we all do) then this is a must read.

Back to top

Feature: Website owners need more than web designers

Why is it many website owners are changing their web designer even when he or she has built them a great looking, usable website? What more are they looking for?

Read ‘Website owners need more than web designers’

Back to top

Colin James Firth: Content is King

If ‘content is king’ then the designer is like the King’s tailor – there to make the King look fabulous without taking any of the limelight for themselves.

Read ‘Content is king’

Back to top

Content is King

If ‘content is king’ then the designer is like the King’s tailor – there to make the King look fabulous without taking any of the limelight for themselves.

Just because content is king doesn’t mean, however, that the designer’s job is any less important. How seriously would people take the King if his suit was poorly made? It has to look good.

An unhealthy obsession with aesthetics

I’ve been a designer for 15 years and I started out with a very unhealthy obsession for aesthetics. It was always about how good, or trendy, or innovative a design was. Making it readable was just an irritating request from the copywriters.

Thankfully, I soon realised just how important content is and began to change the way I worked to suit. And quickly went from being obsessed with immitating every fashionable design going to really thinking about how messages should be presented. Which is pretty important, really, because the message is usually conveniently encapsulated in the copy – which should make it a lot easier to choose the right design style.

It sounds obvious now.

Are you weakening the message?

But I still see bucket loads of designs that don’t do the content any justice because they ignore it and go off and do their own thing.

They end up giving conflicting messages – weakening the overall effectiveness of the piece. I’ve seen many ill-conceived designs that probably damaged the brand that the designer should have been going out of their way to enhance.

The problem is, a lot of designers have a gaping hole in their CV that leads to this misunderstanding about the importance of content. They’re missing experience of working with copywriters.

I’ve been really lucky to have worked with loads of copywriters over the years. There’s one who I’m still in touch with today – who incidentally gave me a lift to my first interview for a design job.

He’s very talented and I learned a great deal from him. He’s very passionate about words – and grammar and punctuation – and it he had a positive influence on me very early on in my career.

These days I’m part of a small – and very active – design team supporting a very large and knowledgeable group of content people. We are a PR agency, so you’d expect a lot of writers! But the crucial thing for us is as an agency we seriously care about the quality of the content we produce for and on behalf of our clients. It can’t help but make a positive influence on our designs.

What can a copywriter  teach you?

So what can a copywriter teach a designer? Actually, a lot. A good writer will have done their research for a start. So the copy they’ve written should be looked at as an integral part of the design brief.

It should tell you in black and white how you should approach the design – regardless of whether it’s online or for print.

Copywriters also tend to know how to spell and, vitally, how to use grammar properly. If you’re a designer and you doodled through English lessons at school, you should do all you can to catch up on your grammar and spelling. A miss-placed apostrophe or hyphen could change the entire meaning of your piece. At which point you’ve failed as a designer.

It also makes proof reading much easier because you’ll actually know what to look for. Trust me when I say copywriters think dimly of designers who drop errors into headlines and don’t clean them up before passing the design back for checking. Learn from copywriters and you will end up with fewer mistakes in your designs as a result.

Copy can be frustrating

Even so, after all these years, I still find it a challenge to get the best out of the copy – maybe it’s the pressure of not mucking up the message. But I’m comfortable with that: setting high standards for the design with content taking the lead just adds to the challenge. Which adds to the fun. And design should be fun and challenging.

I really hope that gives some comfort to any designers who are afraid they’ll relinquish some kind of power by embracing content.

Copywriters aren’t totally perfect though. The big thing is that they tend not to be able to visualise their copy in situ while they are writing it. Certainly not in the same way a designer can.

I’ve often been frustrated that copy isn’t fit for the purpose of the design (the writers here do a great job by the way).

The classic one we’ve all had is when there’s too much copy. But there are new challenges – the online world is creating new rules for writers all the time; keyword optimisation and meta tagging are relatively new concepts for copywriters, as is the importance of micro-copy to usability.

Designers have a responsibility to appropriately present the message, but copywriters should be learning too. And to that end, if you’re going to learn from a copywriter, the learning process should be as mutually beneficial as possible.

Don’t expect too much, though. Copywriters are just wired differently and their primary focus should still be on what they’re absolutely best at – figuring out the right message and skillfully organising the words.

So, as a designer you should take the lead. The ultimate responsibility for the message carrier – which is your design – lies with you.

What you can do to improve your content

So, as well as befriending a good copywriter, what else can you do?

Read. Read everything. Read the free newspaper in the morning, the signs and ads on the bus. Or the back of your coffee cup. Read stuff you wouldn’t otherwise read – magazines and ads that aren’t aimed at you are brilliant at widening your design and copy horizons. And if you haven’t go it, get the internet on your phone. The hour I spend travelling to work and back each day is usually spent reading blogs and news stories, and following random links on Twitter – just out of curiosity. If you don’t travel far to work, get up half an hour earlier each day and grab a coffee. Reading lots will hard-wire correct spelling and grammar into your brain and get you used to seeing words in context. You’ll develop an instinct for what works – in terms of copy and designs. And you’ll learn mega amounts of other stuff as an added bonus.

Content really is the King – and it’s what your audience are REALLY interested in. Embrace it, tailor your designs to fit, and enjoy seeing the quality of your work improve immeasurably.

Website owners need more than web designers

Why is it many website owners are changing their web designer even when he or she has built them a great looking, usable website? What more are they looking for?

The prevailing wisdom within the web design community is that you should specialise. However, does that really make sense? Is that what website owners are looking for? I would argue it is not.

Website owners have an increasingly difficult job. Not only do they need to provide visitors with an engaging, usable and accessible website, they also have to interact with them through social media, great content and other online marketing channels.

Think about it for a moment. The most effective online strategies consist of at least the following elements…

  • An effective website
  • Email marketing
  • Google Adsense
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Youtube

Website owners also have to worry about…

  • Business strategy
  • User profiling
  • Competition analysis
  • Site promotion
  • Site analytics
  • Calls to action

The list could go on.

When faced with such a daunting task they do not want a specialist. What use is an expert in ruby on rails when faced with such a broad and complex set of issues?

The need for generalists

They need generalists. They need people who can advise them on the breadth of challenges they face.

The specialist argues that they can hire multiple specialists to handle these different areas. However, who brings the pieces of the puzzle together? The website owner? I would argue this is asking too much.

Large numbers of suppliers create serious logistical problems, not to mention the potential for shifting blame. Most website owners want a one stop provider who can advice them on the whole range of challenges they face.

Being a web designer in this new decade is about more than building websites. A web designer will need to have a good understanding of business practices, site analytics, marketing, copywriting, social media and more.

Admittedly those who advocate specialising encourage people to have a T shaped knowledge. In other words web designers should have a superficial knowledge of all areas and a deeper understanding of one.

Although I can see the value in this approach as a way to ensure you work well with other specialists, I do not think it will meet the needs of most website owners.

Web designers need a deeper understanding of a broader set of areas if we are to be of real value to their clients.

The alternative is that website owners themselves have to develop this level of knowledge and that is going to be difficult for anything other than a full time website owner.

How then can a web designer broaden his or her knowledge? The answer is simple – start exposing yourself to a great number of sources of information.

Broadening your knowledge

Web designers should of course be learning about the latest CSS techniques and jquery plugins. However, they should also be reading marketing blogs, business strategy books and even attending copywriting workshops.

Here are a few suggestions to start off the budding generalist…

I know what you are thinking – “I don’t have time for that.” Well I am sorry to break the news but you have picked the wrong job!

The web is one of the fastest moving industries on the planet and needs an incredibly broad set of skills. If you don’t have those skills or fail to keep them up-to-date then you will lose credibility. You need to make time.

At the end of the day it is simple. Our website owners are asking for advice on everything from design to facebook and if we don’t give it to them then somebody else will. That is the reality of a consumer culture.

Kevin Rose on Community

At this years at Future of Web Apps I was fortunate enough to interview Kevin Rose, the founder of digg.com about running online community.

Paul: Ok, so I’m really pleased to have joining me today Kevin Rose from Digg and Diggnation. Good to have you on the show.

Kevin: Thanks for having me.

Paul: So, Kevin we had your keynote this morning at Future of Web Apps, which was brilliant, really enjoyed that, and you talked about some really interesting concepts around the subject of community building and that whole complexity that goes into that, and you made some really good points about how to encourage and engage people in community, and you talked particularly about this idea of massaging egos, which I thought was very interesting. Maybe you could share a little bit about that?

Kevin: Well I just think that people don’t really talk about that side of things, it’s kind of like it’s a black art in some ways. People are like “anything that would stroke the ego is a bad thing, and we shouldn’t do that!” but we’re doing that all the time in the features that we build. And you see it even in the most successful sites out there, I think, have figured a way to inflate an individuals self worth, in a way, when they use their products.

Paul: So you want to give us some examples, perhaps?

Kevin: I think that one of the biggest one is Twitter and the follower count and the idea that when you look at that number it’s “whose is bigger” contest between whoever is playing the game, right. So it could be between a couple of different plumbers, that have competing plumbing companies, they have Twitter accounts, any celebrities that are on there. And that’s just one of just a whole slew of different examples from Farmville, which is a really popular Facebook application, that figure out ways to give you certain awards every time you do different things and give you different badges and levels and things like that. I don’t use it as a way to drive the idea of the feature, so I’m not backing into it saying: “Ok, how can I massage the ego?” I think of, what does the community need? What features are we building? And I want to always make sure that person is rewarded in some form of fashion, and that can either be like, I’m digging a story and this is important to me so I want to show that I’ve added one to the overall count and in my profile it can be something where I achieve a certain level based on my contributions to the system, so I’m leveling up inside of a system. And there are so many ways to go about this.

Paul: One of the ones that you mentioned were leader boards, about how in the early days of Digg you had this leader board and then you decided to remove it. The thing that always strikes me from my experience of working with leader boards is that they can actually be gamed in a negative way, which ends up actually damaging the community. And is that why you removed them from Dig? And how did you get around that problem?

Kevin: Yeah, in the early days it was based on the total amount of stories that reached the front page, the stories that you submitted. And so it became this game that for the first six months was a lot of fun for pretty much everyone on the site, because they would look at the number one slot and say: “Ok that’s something I can achieve if I put in a decent amount and effort and work into trying to play this game.” As they grew hundreds and hundreds of stories deep to where you’d have to have a thousand front page stories, people were having a hard enough time getting one story on the front page of Digg, let alone a thousand. So it would discourage a lot of the other people and all of a sudden we had this press articles about how Dig is controller by very small subset of its user base bla bla bla.. so it was something we decided to remove because there was no real way for anyone to break into it once it hit a certain level. Some of the stuff we’re looking at now, well there is a couple of things: one, we plan on opening up a promotion of stories to a whole slew of different, like an open taxonomy, a whole slew of tags, so if you’re in something very niche, like rock climbing or road bikes, you’ll be able to jump into that section and see stories getting promoted in there. And so it’s not necessarily about just that one home page that sees a hundred and some stories a day, it can be about these other small verticals. And inside of those verticals we want to highlight the users data really finding the quality content. One ways that this can be gamed is if you’re saying: ok it’s only by the people that submit stories. Because some people are, I don’t know if they sleep or not, but they happen to be the first one to go out there and always find the best stories and be the first submitter. So, ways that we can get around this is not look at submissions, but also looking at the people that dug this early on, and how accurate they are at predicting whether something is going to be very popular. So, let’s say you’re in the road bikes section and there may be someone who diggs 50 articles a day, but let’s say you only digg 5 a day, but the ones you always digg eventually become very popular within the ecosystem. That means that you’re a very prescient user, you are a user that is very good at predicting what the community is going to enjoy.

Paul: Quality rather than quantity

Kevin: Exactly, so if we can start to structure our leader boards around those concepts, those are very difficult things to game, because even if you do game them you’re really providing the masses with what they want, high quality content. So, and then also lowering that window, so instead of saying it’s an all-time leader board, something that the sum all of your activities over time that would be hard to penetrate, you can say this is leader board of the best users in the last 30 day, or the best users in the last week or two weeks.

Paul: Constantly resetting

Kevin: Resetting, refreshing always making sure, and there might be some people who stick and some that go on vacation or holiday for a couple of weeks and then all of a sudden they’re back to square one.

Paul: Talking about your users, you talked a little bit about putting content live and then seeing how people responded to that and adjusting accordingly. Do you actually ever do any formal usability testing where you get people in and try stuff out?

Kevin: Absolutely

Paul: Ok, so how do you go about doing that, do you select people from the community or how does it go?

Kevin: We typically do it into three different sets of groups: we’ll have what we call our “lurkers to the site”, so people that are aware of Digg but they don’t participate. So they like the home page and understand what we’re doing we’ll invite them in for some usability testing, and then we’ll invite some peop

le that have no idea what Digg is, they’ve never heard of it before. And then we’ll invite our hard-core, on-Digg-24/7, the big stream users, and we’ll take those three groups of users probably 10-15 per group, set them down in front of a bunch of computers and then just walk them through a bunch of different scenarios.

Paul: One of the kinds of advantages of being a well established brand, whether it be pamps(?) or Digg or whatever else, you can try stuff out and you’ll get a reaction from your community and people will tolerate that backwards and forwards. But if you’re a startup – we just interviewed a guy earlier today who literally is him and his mate and they’re launching a startup – they only get one opportunity to make a good impression, really. So this idea of putting stuff out and testing it do you think that always applies?

Kevin: Yeah I do, I think that if you have just bad ideas and you can’t get a product to where at least people are like “that’s interesting enough to where I want to play with it” then you have to go back to square one. So that initial launch is not proving itself then maybe you need to try a different idea, but for us I think that we’ve been very fortunate in that first initial ideas that we’ve launch with have been sticky enough to have a group of users that wanted to continue using the product, and that’s the point where your starting to get feedback from these users or they’re starting to ask you “I’m having a bug or problem with this particular feature, or I want to see this or that” and that’s where I truly believe in the fact that you should release, iterate and continue to evolve as fast as possible.

Paul: Ok, that’s interesting. Can we talk briefly about community and community culture, because I’m fascinated by this idea that as the different applications launch they all develop little cultures of their own, if that makes sense, and Digg has got this reputation as being quite an edgy and has this kind of edginess to it, where there’s the classic one about posting the key for (something??) and they’re quite bulshy, they know what they think, they are very opinionated. How much do you think that that is born out of Diggnation and the fact that you guys present a certain persona in Diggnation and that’s kind of trickled through to who you’ve attracted on the site and how people have chosen to interact on the site?

Kevin: I haven’t really put that much thought into it, but I know that initially during the early days, well we launched before Diggnation so we always kind of had it was an edgy group to begin with and so

Paul: Perhaps it’s just the people you know

Kevin: Yeah, maybe I have some shady friends, no, but I think that there was some of the people that initially came to the site were fans of TagTV, which was the television network that I was involved in and all that, and so these were early adopter geeks and then we started the podcast later and that grew along with the site, but I think that today I really wish there was as many people listening to the podcast as there are diggers, ’cause right now last month I think we did around 40 million uniques on the site and on Diggnation site 150,000-200,000 people, so it’s kind of separated.

Paul: Perhaps the culture was established before has perpetuated.

Kevin: Sure

Paul: Have you found that a problem as you’ve expanded out into new areas? As different people come into the site, are they finding it quite hard to break in?

Kevin: Yeah, I think so absolutely. There’s no one single universal homepage that’s going to suit everyone and I don’t think that you’re ever going to be able to throw millions of people into the same chat room-slash-comment stream and expect them to all get along. So our big push with some of the new redesign and stuff that we’re doing with the next version of Digg is going to be to break up these sandboxes into smaller areas and service a lot more of the long tail of content, so that if my mom comes onto Digg there’ll be something for her to jump into. Versus today, she would look at the front page and be like “I don’t understand all these crazy Internet memes”

Paul: From our point of view as web designers, even the Tech section is too broad for us, we want our own Web Design subsection so that suits us perfectly

Kevin: Absolutely. I’ve been hearing that from the Linux and Unix candy(?) for a long time.

Paul: You talk about this redesign that you’re working on at the moment and we’ve had Daniel on the show a few times and he did our SXSW special where he was very rude to me – but we’ll gloss over that. You talked about in your presentation about how Daniel talked about this idea of simplicity “what can we take away”. Do you want to talk a little bit more about that because that’s something we hark on about a lot so it’s nice to hear you say it too.

Kevin: I think that there is, especially when you get to a certain size, it’s very easy when you’re a small company an you’re five people, like-minded individuals and you’re all trying to build a core product and you know what’s good for the web. Then as you grow into a larger 20, 30, 50-plus person company, you get different opinions and different takes on how to build websites. You have a biz-dev that says “wouldn’t it be great if we had this feature,” marketing that says “it would be great if we could have another banner ad here,” you have the CEO that wants a little something else – there’s so many cooks in the kitchen. It’s important, I think, to always strive to have as least clutter and just a clean, light-weight experience that people can grock(?). People tend to forget that and it’s very easy to say “I want the entire kitchen sink as a feature-set and present all on the same page”. Hopefully there’s someone in charge of the company that can fight those battles, because as you get bigger there’s more and more battles to fight when it comes to that kind of stuff.

Paul: We do a lot of large public sector and very bureaucratic websites – that’s the kind of work that we do – and that’s terrible for that because they have entire committees that are arguing over what content to put on their site, so it’s something I’m very familiar with. There’s a great book which you might have read called “Laws of Simplicity” – have you read that?

Kevin: I haven’t read it, no.

Paul: Superb book! Which talks about exactly this and how to go about simplifying anything, from your life right the way through to a website. It’s really interesting stuff. John Madda, I think.

Kevin: I have to write that down. I am typing it to the iPhone as we speak.

Paul: Do you have any questions you wanted to ask?

Stanton: Yeah, one of the key things I took away from your talk is when you said: “stop thinking you understand your users and learn what they actually do”. You said you do user testing, is there anything else?

Kevin: To be honest I don’t even like user testing. I think user testing is great for the big gotchas, like where you’ll slap your forehead and say “oh boy, I don’t know how we were about to miss that one” just before their products went live. I remember even before launching Digg – I was probably about 3 weeks out – and I was showing my friends, who I respect their opinion on all things Internet, I was showing them what Digg was. And several of them were like “I just don’t get it,” “I kinda understand what you’re trying to do” In my mind, there’s been so many times when you have so many well-educated people give you an opinion one way or another on whether or not something’s gonna work, but until you actually release it and get it in real users hands, you really don’t know what’s gonna happen – and it can go either way. I’m not saying there isn’t stuff you can do to, hopefully, make it go into a positive way. Like when you’re developing a feature, you’re bouncing it off the right types of advisors and people that you trust in the community that can think through some of these problems. But I think that 9 times out of 10 it’s better, rather than try and over-think it and sit there and say “we absolutely have to have this as part of the release” or arguing for weeks on end over how something should go, I’d rather take that time, make a decision: develop it, release it, and if it doesn’t work – worst case – you change it. That’s worst case! So many people forget that, they think it has to be perfect before they get it out there and it’s like “Get it out there!” because they’re just wasting time. It kills me when I watch people going on and on for weeks debating things. When in the same amount of time they could’ve released it, fixed the problems and re-released the code.

Paul: There’s seems to be this perception that the web is some kind of fixed thing that once it’s out there, people have almost got the attitude that it’s like printing a book; there’s no going back.

Kevin: Without a doubt! They think it’s like printing a book. And the other thing is they think that failure is a horrible thing. I don’t see it like that. If you fail at least you’re being real with your user-base. Jump on the blog, write a post and say “You know what, we fucked up there. That was a bad feature, we should’ve done it like this. Thanks for your feedback. Here’s the new feature.”

Paul: There’s a great quote from Winston Churchill who said once that “Success is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm” which just sums it up brilliantly. Any other things?

Stanton: You mentioned building a group of advisors, a group of people you trust and can not be afraid of to show ideas to and get their feedback, even if its bad feedback. And you talked about not necessarily designers or developers. What kind of advisors do you have, not necessarily for Digg ’cause I guess they’re quite high-business-level people, but for small ideas that you have that just bounce off people?

Kevin: I don’t have any official advisory roles on my other projects, but if you’re fortunate enough to befriend people in the industry that you really respect their opinion – I’m always bouncing ideas off of Tony from Zappos or like some of the WeFollow Twitter directory stuff off of Ed from Twitter – you need these guys. Even if you don’t have official advisory roles with them where you’re giving them shares, just to be able to sit down and have a coffee and brainstorm is just such a valuable thing. Even some of our angel investors, some of the best angels can be advisors as well; they’re not just investors, but hopefully you’re allowing them to invest in your company because they’re adding value outside of just the money that they’re contributing. So some of our angels are just extremely well-connected people in the Bay area or wherever, and to just be able to go to them and say “you know I’m having a really hard time with image storage or scalability in this area” and they go “oh, well I’ve worked with a guy here, I know this guy here and let me just set up a lunch “and they send 2 emails and because we both mutually respect that investor, they’re willing to get together with you. Little things like that can be really valuable.

Paul: Kevin, thank you so much. I know you’ve gotta go on and do other stuff, so thank you for taking time to come on the show and maybe we’ll talk to you in future.

Kevin: Sounds good, thanks for having me.

Thanks goes to Simon Hamp for transcribing this interview.

Are you always looking for a new challenge?

Headscape has a position available for the kind of person always looking for new challenges and experienced in marketing and managing startup projects.

For nearly eight years Headscape has been producing outstanding websites for our clients. However, although we enjoy delivering sites for our clients, that is not the end of our ambition.

For some time now we have been actively developing our own projects both online and off.

We have developed Boagworld.com, a prominent source of web design information. The award winning Boagworld Podcast is the longest running and most popular web design podcast catering for all those who design, develop and run websites on a daily basis. It has a vibrant community and is beginning to generate significant revenue for Headscape through advertising.

Headscape has also developed its first product – Getsignoff. Getsignoff.com is a tool for managing the design sign off process and is aimed at freelancers and web design agencies. Initial sales have been encouraging, but we would like to grow and market this product further.

Finally we have also started running workshops and consultancy clinics to further broaden our revenue streams. As with getsignoff, these need further promotion and management to become truly successful.

We have no shortage of ideas and have put some of them into action. However, what we need now is somebody to champion these ideas and take them forward. Are you up for the challenge?

What we are looking for

We need somebody who has experience in managing and promoting startup projects. Somebody with drive and enthusiasm. Somebody always looking for a new challenge.

We are looking for somebody who could:

  • Grow and help monetize Boagworld
  • Relaunch Getsignoff and champion its development moving forward
  • Manage and promote upcoming workshops
  • Assess the feasibility of other ideas as they emerge and put together business plans for those with potential

    However, most of all we are looking for somebody who can help us shape the non service side of our business. In consultation with the Headscape directors you would form your own role, identifying and pursuing new business opportunities.

    Is this for you?

    So are you interested? No doubt you have questions. Why not get in touch by emailing [email protected]. Please include a CV and any thoughts you might have as to how you see the role developing.

    The biggest ecommerce lies and how to avoid them

    I am amazed at some of the advice I read about building successful ecommerce sites. I seriously wonder who writes this stuff! In this post I debunk 5 common myths.

    Of all the sites I am involved in at Headscape it is the ecommerce sites that excite me the most.

    How can you not get excited about working on a website where the fruits of your labour are so visible and direct? Do a good job and the website makes more money, screw up and profits decline. There is something wonderfully black and white about it.

    With such a measurable and obvious success criteria, you would have thought best practice would be well established and generally accepted. Bad advice would be quickly exposed for what it is and successful techniques would rise to the top.

    However, it would appear that is not the case. I am amazed at how bad some of the advice is and how much bad practice exists.

    In this post I want to focus on five of the worst offenders, beginning with the belief that you can never give users too much information.

    1. You can never give the user too much [Wrong!]

    Only recently I was reading an article about ecommerce that actively argued for providing users with as much information as possible.

    On the face of it, this sounds like a good idea. The more information you provide, the better informed their decision becomes. However, in reality too much information can be overwhelming and lead to choice paralysis.

    Compare for example the experience of buying a computer. For you and me this is a purchasing decision we are very comfortable with. However, for the majority of consumers it can be an intimidating experience. It is a minefield because there are too many choices and options.

    Recently I bought a Dell netbook. Even as an experienced computer users this was a harrowing decision. I knew I wanted a low end, cheap netbook, so immediately ignored the plethora of laptops and desktops that could have confused my purchasing decision. However, that didn’t make the purchasing process easier. I still had to choice between the Dell Mini 9, 10 and 10v. I had to wade through technical specs outlining the differences, most of which I found unintelligible.

    Screen capture from Dell Website

    Once I had made my choice, I was presented with even more details and options. I had to select colour, type of hard drive, size of hard drive, operating system and on and on and on. In fact it even made me approve options where I had no alternative choice!

    When compared to the limited and clearly defined line up of Apple computers, the contrast could not be more apparent.

    Screen capture from the Apple website

    More is not always better. If you want to encourage users to buy, then you need to make their choice a simple one. Remove everything but the most important information and minimise the number of choices available. This is something that has been understood for some time in traditional retailing, but has not filtered through to the web.

    One retail technique that has transferred to the web is up-selling. However, you should thing twice about how to implement this technique.

    2. Never miss an opportunity to cross-sell [Wrong!]

    We all know supermarkets do it. You are queuing at the checkout surrounded by chocolate, magazines and other extras. They hope we will be tempted to pick up something on the way out. You go in for a loaf of bread and come out with a basket full of chocolates and a magazine on interior design. Any marketeer will tell you how effective this technique is.

    Photograph of a supermarket checkout

    Many successful websites also use this approach very effectively. Amazon is always looking for opportunities to cross-sell, based on its extensive knowledge of your buying habits and those of other users. However, even though it is obvious we will buy items on the spur of the moment, Amazon does not always up-sell.

    Amazon recognises that the web is not the same as the real world. Unlike supermarkets, Amazon will not up-sell once users reach the checkout. In fact they are careful to avoid any distractions.

    Screen capture of Amazon checkout

    When the competition is only a click away you do not have the luxury of asking users to stand in line at the checkout, while you present them with additional products. Unlike the supermarket checkout there is no person to guide you through the process. It is user driven and so has to be as easy, focused and fast as possible.

    Yes, it is important to up-sell. However, do it before the checkout process begins. Once the user makes a decision to buy, you need to ensure nothing gets in the way of that transaction. Some opportunities to cross-sell are worth missing.

    Of course, there is no reason you cannot encourage users to buy again after the transaction is complete. That is where we need to look beyond the website.

    3. Its all about your site [Wrong!]

    Web designers want to sell you web site design services. It is therefore unsurprising that they concentrate their attention and advice on the website. However, the website is only one small part of a successful ecommerce business. The heart of successful ecommerce lies in service, not the website.

    Don’t become so fixated on tweaking and improving your website that you neglect other areas of the user experience. Good customer service extends well beyond the users interactions with the website. It also includes vital components such as:

    • Email notifications - Do you keep the customer informed about the progress of their order?
    • Telephone support – Do you allow customers to speak to you directly?
    • Returns policy – How easy is it for customers to return an item if they do not like it?
    • Fulfilment – Are you in a position where you can fulfil orders quickly and dispatch them immediately?
    • Complaints handling – How well do you handle customer complaints? Do you go the extra mile?
    • Ongoing communication – Do you regularly keep in touch with customers? Do you offer them special deals and discounts? Is it easy for customers to opt out of these communications?

    Customers who receive superb service are considerably more likely to make a second purchase and even more likely to recommend you to friends and family.

    Screenshot from Customer Service Matters

    Visit Bruce’s blog Now

    It is even possible to substantially reduce your marketing spend if you make customer service a priority. Instead your reputation will spread through word of mouth.

    Do not misunderstand, I still believe that getting your website right is extremely important. Small things can make a big difference in the eyes of your users. Take for example security.

    4. Users care about security… badges [Wrong!]

    There is no doubt that users care about online security. In fact there is still a large proportion of people who are unwilling to buy online for fear of credit card fraud. The media has done an excellent job at ensuring the public are suspicious of online transactions, even though they are willing to hand over their credit card in a restaurant.

    Whether the users concerns are justified or not, we need to take them seriously if we want people to buy.

    Many ecommerce businesses spend a lot of money ensuring their sites are secure. How then do they choose to communicate this massive investment to their users in order to reassure them? – They slap a badge on their website!

    Adding a small Verisign or Mcafee badge to your checkout page is not enough to alleviate users fears. At best they are free advertising for the companies involved. At worst they are entirely ignored because they look like banners.

    A screen capture of a website with no security information except a Verisign logo

    A better approach is to tackle the problem head on. Add copy to your website addressing this issue and the steps you have taken to ensure the customers security. Do not rely on a single graphic to say all that needs to be said.

    5. Amazon is the template we should all follow [Wrong!]

    This final lie is probably the most widely held of all. There is a belief that because Amazon is so successful, all ecommerce websites should follow their example.

    There is however a number of flaws in this argument:

    • They don’t get everything right (nobody can).
    • They are partially successful because they were one of the first ecommerce websites to market.
    • Their reputation and brand recognition allows them to get away with a lot.
    • Users are familiar with their site and its eccentricities.

    In short, what works for them will not necessarily work for you. Too many website owners blindly copy Amazon because they are seen as the leader in ecommerce. Not only is that flawed for the reasons I gave above, it also removes the possibility of you ever being better than Amazon or innovating in anyway.

    Amazon Homepage

    Don’t get me wrong – I believe there is a lot that can be learnt from Amazon. However, I do not believe it is in anybodies interest to blindly follow their lead.

    Bonus lie: Ecommerce is easy

    Probably the biggest lie of all is that ecommerce is easy. Admittedly off the shelf solutions such as Shopify make it extremely easy to build ecommerce websites. However, building the site is only the beginning. The real challenge comes in:

    • focusing your site,
    • deciding on when to up-sell,
    • providing great customer service,
    • communicating clearly
    • and learning from others.

    Creating a successful ecommerce business is a long term commitment and you will need to continually evolve both your website and strategy.

    So, what about you? What ecommerce lies have you heard? What great advice would you like to pass on? Post in the comments below.

    190. Become a branding Ninja

    On this week’s show: Ryan and Stanton interview Alex Hunter about managing your brand. Meanwhile Paul and Marcus look at how to speed up your website.

    Play

    Download this show.

    Launch our podcast player

    News

    Offline inspiration

    It has been a while since we have featured a Smashing Magazine post on the show so thought it was about time.

    Shocking though this will be, it is not a top 10 list. Instead it is an excellent post on finding inspiration offline.

    The post argues that using online sources such as CSS galleries for inspiration is not enough. As designers we need to be taking a walk, visiting a museum or spending time sketching. We need to consider these an essential part of our job description.

    The post examines eight areas of inspiration:

    • Nature
    • Museums
    • Sketching
    • Hobbies
    • Music
    • Photography
    • Traditional art
    • Our own imaginations

    It then discusses what can be found in these areas of inspiration. In particular the post looks at:

    • Texture
    • Color
    • Shapes
    • Changing our perspective
    • Discovering themes

    The problem is that we don’t feel like visiting a museum is work and even if we do our bosses certainly do not! However, this is eloquently addressed to:

    The trick is to consider alternative inspiration an an essential part of the job. While it feels more like play than work at first, finding true inspiration should mean more than browsing through the same material over and over. And we should know that in a creative industry, having fun is okay; it doesn’t mean we’re being unproductive.

    Girl looking at Museum exhbit

    Image source

    Some of the best design work I ever did came from offline sources. I just wish I prioritised this kind of research more.

    All you need to know about CSS3

    Mr Stanton discovered a great new site this week – CSS3.info. With CSS 2.1. becoming increasingly supported and integrated into our work, it is time to look ahead at what CSS 3 has in store.

    CSS3 has got some really interesting new features that are already supported in some browsers. From advanced selectors such as attribute selection through to multiple column layouts, there is a host of goodies we can start to play with.

    What is more, by using graded browser support we don’t need to worry too much about IE’s lack of support.

    CSS3.info is a great starting point if you want to begin using some of these advanced CSS features. It provides examples of each new feature and tells you what browsers support it. It also provides a selector check so you can see what advanced selectors work in different browsers. Finally, it also provides up-to-date information on how the new specification is progressing.

    I really would encourage you to take a look at CSS3. Its got some really exciting features that you can start using now.

    Preparing and planning for a redesign

    Although I am generally against the principle of redesigning sites from the ground up, there is no doubt that every site needs a refresh once in a while.

    Knowing when and how to go about redesigning your website can be a tricky process. Fortunately Web Designers Depot has a post that might help. Entitled “Preparing and planning for a redesign” it provides some valuable advice for any website owners thinking of redesigning.

    The Firefox website before and after its redesign

    The post starts by looking at how you know it is time to redesign. Contributing factors include:

    • Out of date technologies and techniques
    • The age of a design
    • The lack of a CMS
    • Search engine ranking problems
    • Under performance
    • Your competition

    It then goes on to look at what needs to be done in preparation for a redesign. This includes:

    • Identifying what works
    • Being clear on what doesn’t
    • Looking at what can be removed, combined or added
    • Knowing what motivates your users
    • Whether a complete redesign is even necessary

    Finally, the article concludes by looking at some potential dangers in redesigning. These include dealing with repeat users and avoiding broken links.

    Although I don’t agree with everything in this post, it is a useful article if you are considering a redesign. Check it out.

    Confusing menus and links: the web’s biggest challenge

    I want to conclude with a post that might make you rethink your sites navigation. It is by Gerry McGovern and is entitled “Confusing menus and links: the web’s biggest challenge.”

    Gerry applies his task focused approach to information architecture. He argues that too many organisations are more concerned with organising their content into an IA, than meeting the needs of users.

    He suggests that to make a truly effective information architecture we need to start thinking like our users, who are focused on the task at hand.

    To demonstrate his point he refers to the BBC sports site as a good example:

    If you visit the BBC homepage and choose “Sport” you are brought to a page about sport. Just sport. The critical first screen is all about sport. No links to news or weather or business. Just sport. If you click on Football you arrive at a page that’s just about Football. Just Football. Not cricket. Not rugby. Not golf. Just football. If you click on “Premier League” you get to a page dedicated to the Premier League.

    This is not web design. It’s web management. It’s about eliminating all choices that are not connected with the customer’s current task, which in the above example might be: Find out the latest news about the Premier League.

    BBC Football website

    Too often as website owners we clutter our navigation with other content that users “might want” or which we want them to look at. Although there are times when we want to cross link or promote other content, we need to be careful not to distract users from achieving their primary aim. If they become overwhelmed by links and fail to complete their task easily, they will leave.

    He ends with a radical suggestion:

    Menus and links need to be designed in the context of the task the customer is trying to complete. That means stripping away higher-level options and creating links that point forward based on the task at hand.

    Stripping away top level navigation is not always a good idea, but this post should make us sit up and think.

    Back to top

    Interview: Alex Hunter discusses developing an online brand

    Ryan: OK, joining us today is Alex Hunter and we’ve just listened to you do a talk on… what was the talk title, I’ve forgotten?

    Stanton: It was kind of “Managing Your Brand”.

    Ryan: “Managing Your … Marketing Your Web App and Future Brands Online” – it was really good talk; really fascinating.

    Alex: Thank you.

    Ryan: So, would you like to tell us a little bit about yourself Alex?

    Alex: Yeah. Sure. I’m an independent, kind of, brand ninja if you will. I’ve worked with some of the biggest brands in the world – on both sides of the pond. I live here in the UK but am originally from California.

    Ryan: OK. And your talk was focused around making yourself your brand; putting your reputation on the line, in a way. It was really interesting – do you want to tell us a little bit about that?

    Alex: Absolutely, yeah. Brand is one of those things that falls by the wayside, especially when it’s a developer-centred organisation. Developers are creating amazing technologies, incredible platforms but while they’ve been doing that they’ve actually been completely changing the game; they’ve been fundamentally changing the way marketing and branding works. It’s amazing, because they’ve create apps and platforms (i.e. social networking) that allow consumers to connect with brands for the very first time. Before, it was just send a letter out, watch a billboard, very mono-directional. But now we have these tools to connect with brands, and the irony is that the people that created that conversation aren’t responding to the fact that they need to have their brands intact.

    Ryan: Right, OK.

    Stanton: You gave a couple of examples of companies that you respect and that do this kind of thing really well. Can you give us a run through those?

    Alex: Sure. I think Digg has put a lot of time and effort into their brand over their, what is, five-year or six-year existence. They’ve done a lot of little things really, really well and it was nice to hear Kevin Rose allude to them yesterday. Things like their blog – I think they’ve got the best corporate blog in the world because it’s not just the Vice-President of PR doing the blogging. It’s not even just Kevin or Jay (the founder and CEO respectively). It’s the developers, the designers, the DB admins, the receptionists, the community managers i.e. the faces and the names of the people that created and curate the community that we as the “Digg Community” have invested so much time and energy into. We can connect with those people now because it’s a name and a face of a real person. And so what they do whenever they roll out a new piece of technology or a new development, they say “Hey, I’m the guy that did this. Here’s why and here’s how (in excrutiating detail). What do you think?”. And that’s kind of revolutionary.

    Stanton: So you would encourage people – especially working in small teams – not to be scared of just talking about what they’re doing and just waiting for “Let’s just wrap it up in a press release” or something and just talk about it naturally and be precious and passionate.

    Alex: The being “precious” about it, I think, is a very, very big risk. That transparency is really beautiful because it brings people into the journey – especially when you’re creating something brand new – when it’s just an idea. You’re creating a new product and you’re updating people on it. It’s why reality TV is such a painful hit, I mean. It’s because people are looking into this thing and, Lord knows, the dev cycle is dramatic and painful and “4 o’clock in the morning” caffeine-induced frenzies. But also, it’s like when things go wrong, hold your hands up – be transparent, human. Don’t hide behind a brand name or a product name. And people will engage with that.

    Ryan: So, how should people be doing this really? How should people be developing their brand and associating themselves towards the brand and then putting it out there. What techniques should they be using?

    Alex: It’s a great question. I think that there’s – especially with Twitter, interestingly – there’s this real blurring of the line between personal brand and corporate brand. A lot of the big names that we know in technology embody their brand; Kevin Rose is Digg, Gary Veynerchuk is Wine Library TV, Tony Hsieh is Zappos – they’re all completely interconnected; there’s no separating them. They’ve invested themselves emotionally in what they do and that shows in the brand. And I think they’re defined by what they want to be. Gary has always been very clear about what his values are, Digg is very clear about what their values are. Apple are very clear about what their values are, and I think, trite as it may sound, going through and identifying your values – and it was really refreshing because as I came off the stage some dude came up to me and say “Hey, thank you. We’ve been labouring over this for years and we finally sat down – or I stopped sitting down with myself and brought the whole team in – and we defined our values” and it’s just gone up exponentially through that. And so I think it’s just define the values, creating an identity out of that and then saying “What are we now and what are we going to be, well, indefinitely really”.

    Ryan: So do you think that’s got to be one of the first stages when you release it – you’ve got to be thinking about where you’re going to take it and how you’re going to present it to the world.

    Alex: Absolutely

    Ryan: That’s vitally important.

    Stanton: So you talked about brand consistency and not to be scared of it or precious of it again. You should be willing to put it out there and how other people in your company – just use it and get it out there.

    Alex: It’s… consistency is a funny one. People always say “The more people you give the message to the more watered down it becomes and the less consistent the message is”. Big brands are really scared of losing the refinement of their message. Realistically, they’ve been doing it for the last 30 years because the person who answers the phone in the call centre is the first point of contact that a user has with your brand. They are representing your brand. The receptionist is representing your brand. So giving someone an account on Twitter to do the same is no different, it’s just a little bit more of a public stage. But, on the flip side, that’s a good thing because people can see you responding to positive comments and negative comments and reacting and helping people in a very public forum. That’s why things like Get Satisfaction and applications like that – and actually in South Africa there’s a really popular one called Hello Peter which businesses are all into trying to respond and react to. So I think it’s a good thing and people shouldn’t be scared of consistency.

    Ryan: Some brands, and we’re talking here quite a bit about people being associated to the brand and being kind of interchangeable. You say Steve Jobs, you say Apple, you always think of the two. For brands like, you mentioned, Diet Coke – being that you were invested into that brand – there’s no person that you can think of associated to that but you see that brand and you’re committed to it. McDonalds, things like that. What differences are there between the two? How do you promote? It’s kind of a logo you’re promoting in a way, isn’t it.

    Alex: It’s a really good question. Diet Coke – the Coke/Pepsi thing is a fascinating brand battle and one of the few where it’s really only a two-horse race, especially in the consumer arena. I mean you’ve got Boeing and Airbus but they don’t really have to advertise because, well, I don’t have $100 billion lying around. Coke and Pepsi, I think, play off the fact that they are rivals and you are either one or the other. I think the more you consume of it the more passionate you become about it. So, if you are a regular Diet Coke drinker – like my wife won’t go to restaurants that serve Pepsi, she’ll leave because she can’t stand the taste of it. I’m sure it’s psychological because as Dave Chapelle said in that video, “It’s all the same”. It’s sugared water in a tin can! But they’ve managed to kind of feed off each other to an extent that has developed this rivalry and therefore developed this passion within its user base.

    Ryan: I suppose then there’s so many different avenues that you can take to compete and get your brand out there. Is there any more that particularly stand out; having a direct competitor is one way of developing your brand or having a figurehead or any other ways you can go about it?

    Alex: Absolutely, absolutely – especially for small – or reasonably small – brands. I think there’s a couple of things that are really important. In kind of extending the reach of the brand and the application with content like blogs – like the Digg example is a great one – but also engagement, both in the physical world and in the digital world. There are a lot of web companies that are getting really good at hosting real world events where users meet up and are rewarded both on a macro-like Digg or a Yelp on a micro level like some companies here in Europe like Qype that I mentioned during my talk that are introducing users to each other and to the people that either administrator or are the, kind of, power users within the community. Kevin Rose mentioned that again yesterday as a really good way; launch parties, regular user meetups, get people talking, get people connected. That really breeds loyalty. It’s astounding what that can do in terms of the competitive.

    Ryan: I think Digg is an excellent example because they have so many methods of getting their message out there, don’t they. They’ve got the blog and the meetups and everything else.

    Stanton: It’s like that with the bigger companies that come out. They can release different products that might not be wildly different but there’s the kind of umbrella brand that’s so strong that you can pick up that product and you know it’s new and you know the quality of it.

    Alex: It’s really interesting. The web has actually fundamentally changed the way brand is perceived because we have these, like, loyalty mechanisms built in. Let’s look at, like, re-branding an acquisition. If my local supermarket gets bought by another supermarket, I don’t care. As long as it’s still there and has food in it – whatever! When Yahoo! bought Flickr they kind of didn’t know what to do with the brand. Do you keep it Flickr or do you make it Yahoo! Photos? And they’ve been kind of to-ing and fro-ing. But you can’t because that loyalty that’s in the Flickr community, that has built it up to where it is, would be PISSED OFF. So now, the compromise that just did recently was “Flickr by Yahoo!”.

    Ryan: And people don’t seem to like it!

    Alex: Exactly! Can you imagine what would happen if they rebranded it to just Yahoo! Photos? I mean, of course you’d get over it eventually but it’d take a lot longer and you’d lose a lot of customers.

    Stanton: That kind of touches on one of the key things I took away from your talk. You said “Look after your users best interests, not yours”.

    Alex: Absolutely. It’s hard because you gotta pay the bills. But that reputation will put you head and shoulders above anybody else. The Amazing Tunes example that I used. There are other unsigned artists sites out there, but not that give 70% of the profits back to the user and not that have a DAB radio station that you can get featured on. That’s looking after users. That’s the definition of an ethical web company.

    Stanton: So for anyone starting out or building a company or a start-up or something, are there any common mistakes or pitfalls that you see all the time, or that you’d encourage people to watch out for or avoid.

    Alex: Absolutely. There’s the ever-present “If you build it, they will come” mentality. If a build a solid app, no matter how ugly it is, people will come. They will not because they’ll never hear about it. And there are competitive apps to almost everything, and if there isn’t one today, there will be one tomorrow, and they will have looked at what you’ve done and they will have started an outreach, they will have started a Twitter account, they will have started a blog, they will have networked it physically and they will have networked it digitally, they will have thought about the presence, the UI. And I think that siloing and kind of compartmentalising and just saying “I’m going to iterate my app” is not going to work. There are exceptions to that rule. TweetDeck – he developed it to solve a personal problem, it just happened to be really well solved, and so it’s kind of growing on its own. But that is the exception to the rule. I think that hiding under a bushel, expecting it to develop on its own, it’s just not going to happen.

    Ryan: With regards to cost of developing your brand, it can be the chicken and the egg sometimes. You need to develop an app and get it out there to make some return to put some investment into marketing it. What initial steps can be used to build yourself up before you can plough some money into it and doing it properly.

    Alex: It’s kind of interesting. I think, yeah – you’ve got to have a concept obviously and some basic stuff done but I think one of the things that I’ve always found that worked, and it was really interesting to hear someone talk about it yesterday – I’m not sure who it was – but this kind of closed beta invite only concept seems to work really well at generating buzz. And if you just get one or two people saying “What the heck is this?”. You get these precious invites – which really aren’t that precious – Spotify’s a great example; actually Spotify’s a great example on two levels: 1) it was invite only for the longest time and 2) our pals in America couldn’t have it and they wanted it so badly that they were spoofing IP addresses and whatever they had to do to actually be able to use it. That kind of sense of exclusivity is a free way of generating that kind of buzz, if you can just get enough people to talk about it and it’s just an occasional whisper in the air, a Moo Card dropped somewhere with an invite code on it – that will just start to get people excited about it. But you have to make sure the product doesn’t suck on the back of it, because that will also spread pretty quickly as well.

    Stanton: A lot of the talks I’ve sat in on today are starting to tie in. Yesterday it was “If you’re going to release something, release it early”. Do one or two things but do them really well, don’t try and do everything at once because you won’t be able to. And then see how things get – see how your users react to it and then build. I guess that’s reacting with the branding people that engage with the brand and then you’re building it and they feel invested.

    Alex: That focus is really important as well, and I think that’s why APIs are so important in the early stage because you can get people developing iPhone apps and other integrations without taking your eye off the ball and doing those one or two things really well and going “Oh crap we’ve got to go home and develop the iPhone app”. It’s really interesting the way that it’s evolved – product development.

    Ryan: Do you have any predictions of how things are going to change in the future. At the minute we’ve got these big companies that are doing it really well, everyone’s kind of imitating and doing similiar things to try and push their brands as well, and inevitably, things will change again. Any predictions about where things might be going?

    Alex: I think it will become even more democratic. I think that the users will become even more powerful because the time to reaction is so fast.

    Ryan: Yeah

    Alex: But I also think loyalty will get even stronger and if you’re going to develop a competing app to an incumbant you’re going to have to work 10 times harder to get people off of what they’re using. As people start to use even more social currency, more points systems, giving more “value” to a user, it’ll be harder and harder to bring them over. I also think it’s going to be harder for people to acquire web brands, especially the big companies – the Yahoo!s the AOLs of the world to acquire small web brands without alienating those kind of fervently loyal people that are already their user base.

    Ryan: You did mention people coming up with all this sort of cutesy names and stuff, mispellings and things like that. The market just seems to be saturated with it. How should people be thinking about deciding on a good brand and what fundamental things should they be thinking about when they’re making those decisions

    Alex: I think that’s a great question. It’s less about the name – like you said it’s really easy just to misspell something or drop a consonant; that’s really lazy – you’ve got to look at it much more as a value-driven. What are our values? What is our product like? What is our team made of? Where are we in the world? And then use that to feed in the name to something obviously catchy, obviously when you can get the domain for a reasonable price – those are practical things that you need to take into consideration. But it’s got to be catchy; it’s got to be engaging, it’s got to mean something. And I think people have started to catch onto the whole “if you can make it a verb”. Digg and Google have become verbs (by the fact that they’re just ubiquitous), but I think people are now starting to say (at least, I’ve heard people around London say) “I’m going to Qype that” and it means “I’m going to check what this place is like” in terms of reviewing a restaurant before I go into it or whip out their Qype Radar iPhone app and check it out before they walk into it. So I think that that’s a really interesting revolution.

    Stanton: You’ve got to work hard to get to that place, don’t you?

    Alex: You really do.

    Stanton: Then it appears in the dictionary!

    Alex: That’s when you know it’s all over. You’ve won!

    Ryan: OK, well, thank you very much for your time. I really enjoyed your talk and I think listeners will find that really useful. Thank you so much.

    Thanks goes to Sam Kirkpatrick for transcribing this interview

    Back to top

    Listeners feedback: Give yourself a speed boost!

    Normally the listener section of the show focuses on me answering listener questions. However, this week on twitter and the forum it has been the other way around.

    You may have noticed that boagworld has been running slow for sometime. Well, I finally decided it was time to fix the problem. However, my knowledge on the subject was fairly limited. That was why I turned to the Boagworld community and boy did they help!

    I thought it was only fair that I share the top 5 things I learn from them.

    Read 5 Ways To Give Your Site A Speed Boost In Less Than 30 Minutes.

    Back to top

    189. How to keep up with web innovations

    On this week’s show: Paul looks at keeping up with web innovations, Marcus shares how we make the podcast and Nora Brown reviews building findable websites.

    Play

    Download this show.

    Launch our podcast player

    News

    Web design match making

    Finding a web designer can be tough. Equally, if you are a web designer (especially if you are just starting out) finding clients can be hard. Much like in love, finding the perfect partnership is difficult.

    37 Signals feel they have the answer. To accompany their already successful jobs board, they have now launched Haystack.

    Haystack, allows web designers to upload a brief description of their agency for free or a more detailed portfolio for $99 per month.

    Clients can then browse this directory in attempt to find the perfect agency.

    And there in lies the problem. Although Haystack is beautifully designed it is actually incredibly limited from a clients perspective. They are only given three choices.

    • Search through hundreds of listings manually
    • Filter by city
    • Filter by budget

    These filters are both extremely limited and are not enough for narrowing down such a large number of designers.

    Haystack.com

    Filter by city allows you to select from a handful of US cities, while dumping all other locations into a catch all of ‘other cities.’ This might possibly be acceptable if there was an option to search by country, region or city. Unfortunately there is not.

    Filter by budget is equally flawed. As a web designer you have to select a price range that you normally work within. This effectively excludes you from smaller or larger projects. In reality things are rarely that black and white.

    Finally I would argue that there are many other characteristics clients look for in an agency. There are no options to filter by technology, skill set or sector experience. The tools available are simply too blunt for making an effective decision.

    My guess is that 37 Signals have been caught off guard by the instant popularity of the app. The current application has been built with a small number of agencies in mind. In such circumstances it would be perfectly adequate.

    I am sure that they are already working on upgrades to the app which will handle the large number of agencies much more elegantly. These guys do good work and there is no doubt that an app like this is much needed.

    Client relations

    There seems to be a lot of posts around this week looking at the working relationship between clients and web designers.

    There is a sitepoint post that focuses on fine tuning your persuasive techniques, a smashing magazine post on dealing with difficult characters and A List Apart post on when to walk away. There is even an article teaching us how to deal with things like scope creep and unhelpful design feedback.

    Although it is good to see posts tackling client management, I do fear they all have a negative tone.

    Last friday I ran a workshop on client relationships and although we discussed dealing with problematic relationships, I tried to make the overall theme a positive one.

    Too many web designers go into new projects seeing the client as either the enemy or as a hinderance to the projects success. Articles like those I have mentioned are in danger of reinforcing this viewpoint.

    It is important to remember that our clients are extremely knowledgeable in their own fields and that both designer and client wants the same thing – a successful website.

    I also worry that too many web designers are perceived as negative. Instead we need to be positive and stop saying no to our clients.

    Myths of usability testing

    Two posts have been published recently that challenge some of our preconceptions about usability testing.

    The first is a post by A List Apart entitled “The Myth of Usability Testing” and is a response to some fairly shocking research.

    The research monitored a number of usability tests run by different agencies on the same site. The result was that although all of the agencies found many problems, only 30% of those problems were common to more than one agency. In other words the agencies could not agree on where the problems lay.

    The article goes on to examine the discrepancy focusing in particular on the questions asked and the people tested. It also explains that context is vital to the interpretation of results.

    The second post is one that challenges the role of eye tracking. The post looks at the pros and cons of the approach and in my opinion is a balanced assessment.

    The post ends with the following conclusions:

    Some have concluded that the benefits of eyetracking are not worth the high cost, effort, and complexity it adds to usability testing. On the other hand, some eyetracking vendors and consultants have promoted the idea that you cannot conduct usability testing effectively without eyetracking.

    The truth lies somewhere between these extremes. If you know how to use eyetracking effectively, it can provide additional insights to usability testing that can help you find problems and answer questions about user behavior. Eyetracking is not essential to usability testing, but if you can afford it and have the time to learn how to use it effectively, it is definitely worth it.

    Personally, we have never recommended eye tracking to our clients and this post has done nothing to persuade me to start. For the type of clients we work for the expenditure is hard to justify.

    jQuery for designers

    I am a huge fan of jQuery. I have said this more than once in the past. The thing I love most about jQuery is that it is aimed squarely at designers. If you can understand HTML and CSS, then you can wrap your head around jQuery. What is more, it lets you do some really cool things very easily.

    Imagine my delight when this week I discovered jQuery For Designers. Apparently the site has been around for a while but I seem to have missed it entirely. In case you have missed it too I thought I would give it a quick mention.

    The site contains dozens of screencasts and examples of various cool functionality that can be built with jQuery. Just some of the tutorials include:

    • Tabs
    • Slider galleries
    • Carousels
    • iPhone sliding headings
    • Fixing floating elements

    Best of all, you can subscribe to these screencasts on itunes enabling you to view them as a podcast.


    This is just one of the many excellent tutorials on jQuery for Designers.

    Back to top

    Feature: 10 secrets to staying informed about web design

    Keeping up in the world of web design is tough. Things move fast and its hard to stay informed. In this post I share 10 ways that RSS can come to the rescue.

    Read 10 secrets to staying informed about web design

    Back to top

    Ad: Win a Macbook Pro or iPod Touch

    Webvanta are running a superb contest that I wanted to quickly mention.

    There is an opportunity to win a Macbook Pro or one of three iPod Touch.

    To be in with a chance of winning, you need to build a great looking, effective website on the Webvanta CMS.

    Don’t worry if you are not an existing Webvanta user. They are going to give you a Webvanta premium account for the duration of the contest.

    The panel of judges (that includes our own Ryan Taylor) will pick a winner on the 1st February so get designing.

    For more details on how to enter visit Webvanta.com/Contest.

    Back to top

    Listeners feedback:

    Recording the podcast

    I had the following tweet from @david_o_connell:

    @marcus67 could you guys do a spot on the tech setup for recording the podcast please (didn’t ask Paul as he muffs the audio :) )

    Thinking about this I realised that I have never covered this riveting subject so after nearly 200 shows it was probably about time!

    It’s worth noting that we are set up to record and edit things as quickly as possible. We have recorded a weekly show for years so we have to get it down and get it out the door. I’m sure there are other ways of doing things and I expect my history of working in expensive recording studios potentially means that I overcomplicate things… but, this is how I do it.

    Hardware

    Ok, this is a list of all the stuff we use:

    • AKG C 2000B microphone (x3) – these are ‘mid’ quality mics that need phantom powering. ‘Decent’ quality mics are a must otherwise you will end up with a thin and probably noisy result. Built-in laptop mics are a total no-no!
    • Angled mic stand (x2) – these are recent addition that mean we can comfortably use our laptops while recording the show.
    • Straight mic stand – we use this for any guests we have on the show.
      Pop shield (x3) – again, a recent addition to the setup. Vital in avoiding pops and bangs on words that begin with ‘p’ or ‘b’.
    • XLR to XLR (balanced) mic leads (x3)
    • Behringer mixing desk – our mixing desk has 4 ‘proper’ mic channels and 4 stereo channels, 2 sub groups and phantom powering to power the mics. On a standard show, I take a feed from sub the group outputs to the input on the Mac. When we’re recording a live show things are little more complex as we need to get the audio to two places at the same time (my Mac recording the show and Paul’s that is broadcasting live). I also need to hear the audio from the intro videos so we’re taking an out from Paul’s Mac for the videos and a feed from the desk master outs to his line input… you need to see it really!
    • Technics closed-ear headphones – these are my ‘old faithfuls’ that I have used for years. It is imperative that one person monitors voice levels throughout the recording. I plug them into the headphone input on my Mac. Closed ear are best because they do not ‘spill’ into the mic.

    I don’t use any external compressors or limiters. That gets taken care of in the software.

    Software

    In my current setup I use Logic Pro to record all of the audio. This is a bit over the top for podcast recording but I also use it to record music and it does both jobs beautifully.
    For the voice tracks I use the setting Voice > Speech > Male Radio that adds a compressor, de-esser (to stop sibilance) and EQ.

    However, if you’ve got a Mac then Garageband will do the job admirably. It even has ‘podcast’ settings that you can assign prior to recording.

    Back in my PC days I used to use Sony Soundforge to record the audio tracks which I would then edit together using Propaganda. I still use Soundforge to bounce down to MP3 (Logic is unreliable at this).

    Recording tips

    Here’s a bunch of tips to :

    • As I’ve already mentioned, use headphones while recording the show to avoid anyone going ‘off mic’. Usually, pointing at them, then their mic gets the message home!
    • When recording 2 people pan the input channels hard left and hard right. This means that if you have to boost any part of a recording it’s easy to locate the specific part. The absolute ideal here would be to have some sort of multi-input box into the computer thereby allowing multitrack recording i.e. I am recorded onto one track while Paul is recorded on to another simultaneously. Thinking about it, I could probably do this right now (for max 2 channels) by separating the inputs and recording 2 mono channels instead of one stereo. But, to be honest, it’s really not worth doing as, mentioned earlier, time is of the essence.
    • Record a quick levels test prior to any recording (because you really don’t want to have to go back in and fiddle with the levels afterwards unless you absolutely have to).
    • Record each section of the podcast on a separate track. Don’t do one long recording as this is much harder to edit later and add in music and audio dividers. If you record each section separately then you should only have to top and tail it which takes no time at all.
    • Once all the voice recording is done, I will add in the intro and outro music, the section dividers and any interviews or questions that are part of the show.
    • Once I’m happy with result, I bounce to Wav format which I then open in Soundforge and save out as 64Kbps 44.1 kHz mono MP3 format which is tagged and FTP’d to our hosts.

    Here’s a screenshot of a final ‘mix’ in Logic before the bounce down (v zoomed out).

    Screenshot of a final ‘mix’ in Logic before the bounce down

    Building Findable Websites

    My name is Nora Brown; I’m a freelance web designer in Boston.

    I’d like to give you and Boagworld listeners a recommendation for a book I recently read, called “Building Findable Websites”, by Aarron Walter. Though I finished reading it a month or so ago, I find I’ve been referring back to it constantly ever since.

    Building Findable Websites: Web Standards, SEO, and Beyond

    In this book, Aarron Walter views SEO as just one aspect of, and in some ways almost a side effect of, improving a website’s “findability” — which is defined on page 2 as:

    “The quality of being located or navigated, the degree to which an object or piece of data can be located, and the degree to which a system supports navigation and retrieval.”

    The goals of findability are listed as:

    1. Help people find your website.
    2. Help people find what they are looking for once they arrive at your site.
    3. Bring your audience back to your website.

    Notice there is no mention of Google or any other search engine, because obviously the ultimate goal is to help *people* find and use your website, not search bots.

    To that end, Walter provides straightforward advice for improving findability at all levels of site development:

    • Front-end markup strategies
    • Server-side strategies
    • Content generation

    Though not every technique will be right for every site, as someone who builds small business and portfolio websites, I found the majority of the recommendations to be practical and implementable. Furthermore, nothing in the book represents SEO for SEO’s sake — all the techniques have other benefits, primarily improving the user experience.

    Aarron Walter manages to fit an amazing amount of useful, actionable information into this slim volume, but if it’s not enough, there are even five bonus chapters which you can download for free at buildingfindablewebsites.com.

    I hope you and your listeners take a look at this excellent book.

    I also think the author Aarron Wlater would make a great candidate for a Boagworld interview.

    Thanks and keep up the wonderful podcast.

    Back to top

    Make your website go viral

    Sometimes even a small design technique is enough to make your website go viral.

    Recently I keep hearing about this Firefox Plugin. Not because it is an amazing plugin. The reason everybody is talking about it is because the website for the plugin uses some gorgeous CSS and Javascript.

    This demonstrates perfectly the point I was making in ‘3 Ways To Make Your Site Stand Out From The Crowd.’

    View the Firefox Plugin

    Read 3 Ways To Make Your Site Stand Out From The Crowd

    187. Jedi Mind Tricks

    On this week’s show: Paul looks at how to better communicate and we ask whether you should mask your email address to avoid spam.

    Play

    Download this show.

    Launch our podcast player

    Housekeeping

    Although we promised you ClearLeft on this week’s show we have had to postpone it until next week. However, that gives you a whole extra week to submit questions via the comments on our blog.

    Back to top

    News

    A web designers time is precious

    We are all too busy, period. However, life can be particularly intense if you work as a web designer or developer. The pace of change is so fast it can be hard to find the time to keep up.

    Fortunately there are some great articles around that provide time savings tips. Take for example Sitepont’s post this week “How to take control of your time.” It provides some excellent advice including the importance of prioritising, the need to leave adequate time and learning to say no.

    Smashing Magazine has a post of their own entitled “20 time saving tips to improve designers workflow.” This includes ways to customise your work environment and better work with tools like Photoshop.

    Speaking of Photoshop there is a great cheatsheet that contains all of the keyboard shortcuts you need to speed up your workflow in Photoshop. When combined with the IE6 cheatsheet for solving common IE6 bugs you will find yourself saving considerable time.

    The answer to overload is not to work longer hours. It is to work smarter and that is what these posts enable you to do.

    15 common ecommerce mistakes

    I love working on ecommerce sites. They are by far my favourite. The reason – you get to see an obvious return on your work, because they have an obvious call to action. Conversion either increases or decreases. Profits either rise or fall. You are in no doubt as to whether you have made a difference or not.

    However, the other reason I love working on ecommerce sites is because so many of them are terrible. Often when you start working on an ecommerce site there are loads of quick wins that make an instant difference to revenue.

    People make the same mistakes again and again. In fact these mistakes are often so predictable that you could write a top 10 list of them… and guess what… that is exactly what Smashing Magazine has done: “15 common mistakes in ecommerce design and how to avoid them“.

    Some of my personal favourite mistakes include:

    • Hiding contact information
    • Long winded checkout
    • Poor customer service
    • Not highlighting related products or otherwise upselling
    • Hiding the cost of delivery

    If you are designing or running an ecommerce site then you really should check this post out. You will be surprised just how many of these mistakes you make.

    The benefits of inline form validation

    I have said it before and I will say it again: “forms are the most important feature on most websites.” Most often a sites call to action requires the completion of a form. Get the form wrong and you frustrate users potentially driving them away.

    Nobody likes filling in forms. Whether it is a contact form, site registration or just a simple login form. It is therefore vital that we make the process as painless as possible.

    There is a post on a List Apart which I have only just gotten around to reading. “Inline Validation in Web Forms” does not sound like the most exciting read but it does provide some invaluable best practice for dealing with forms. However, it doesn’t just provide somebodies opinion on best practice, instead it backs those views up with valuable testing.

    The post takes a typical signup form and trials different forms of inline validation with real users. They didn’t just monitor success/failure rates. They also looked at errors made, satisfaction rates and completion time. They even did some eye tracking.

    Although the results are not surprising, it is nice to have some numbers to put against what we have known to be true. For example, it was obvious that inline validation makes an enormous difference to both actual success and perceived success. Just validating a form on the client side increased success rates by 22% and satisfaction by 31%. Those numbers went even higher when the user is given feedback as they completed each field.

    A valuable post, worth reading.

    Innocent smoothies: A case study into corporate communication

    When you speak at as many conferences as I do, you often find yourself referring to the same examples of good or bad practice. Whether it is comparing Google and Yahoo or fawning over Apple’s great UX design, the same names keep coming up.

    One of the names I often reference is Innocent Smoothies. I love them. They just ‘get the web’. Actually, that is a lie. They get people. They know how to communicate and they know themselves. They have a distinctive voice that makes people warm to them and that is carried through to their website.

    This week Anna Debenham has written an excellent case study on Innocent Smoothies looking in detail at what makes them successful online. In particular she looks at their blog and mailing list.

    As Anna says at the start of her post:

    A lot of the clients I work with who have just set up a web presence for their company think it’s a good idea to start a mailing list and a blog. Everyone else is doing it, so why shouldn’t they? The problem is, so few companies get it right and very few people will bother to read them.

    So what makes Innocent different? Anna gives 6 reasons:

    • They show you the real people behind the business
    • They make their copy fun
    • They don’t just talk about their products
    • They are generous
    • They provide useful information
    • They make good use of imagery

    Anna’s post is packed full of examples, so be sure to check it out. There is a lot most corporate bloggers could learn from Innocent.

    Back to top

    Feature: How to persuade your users, boss or client

    Whether you are trying to get signoff for a site’s design or persuade a user to complete a call to action. We all need to know how to be convincing. This week, we look at how to present our message

    Read Jedi Mind Tricks: How To Persuade Your Users, Boss, Or Clients

    Back to top

    Listeners feedback:

    Email masking

    One of the more popular suggestions for topics was how to mask your email address so it doesn’t get harvested by spammers.

    This is something that everybody worries about from designers to website owners. However, unfortunately there is no good solution. In my opinion you need to just put your email out there and deal with the spam.

    Sure there are a number of possible solutions but none of them are acceptable. They either require the user to be running Javascript (which creates accessibility problems) or they place extra burden on the user. Giving users the ability to contact you is a fundamental part of almost all websites and, so you do not want to make it hard.

    There are however two ways of minimising the impact.

    First, you could choose not to publish your email address, but instead offer a contact form. Although spammers can spam these too, it is harder and there are ways of minimising spam without putting an added burden on users. However if you do use a contact form, send a copy to the user so they have a record.

    Second, you can fall back on good spam filters. Use a site specific email address and make sure it is guarded by a good quality filter. I personally find Google Mails spam filter particularly good, so you might want to consider routing enquiries via that.

    However, at the end of the day if a spammer is determined to spam you there is very little you can do to stop them. Unfortunately, this the price of being online.

    Back to top

    Jedi mind tricks: How to persuade your users, boss, or clients

    Whether you are trying to get signoff for a site’s design or persuade a user to complete a call to action. We all need to know how to be convincing.

    Like many in the web design industry I have a strange job. I am part sales man, part consultant and part user experience designer. One day I could be pitching a new idea to a board of directors, the next I might be designing an ecommerce purchase process.

    There is however a common theme – I spend most of my time trying to persuade people.

    As web designers we often have to nudge people in the direction we want them to go. It is a vital skills that we all have to learn.

    I am not talking about manipulation. I don’t believe in using underhand techniques and I certainly do not believe in lying. However, there are ways of presenting yourself and your argument in such a way that people are more receptive.

    The first and probably most important way is to empathise.

    Empathise

    The worse thing you can do is go into a meeting or begin designing a user interface with a personal agenda.

    If your goal is to push the other party into agreeing with you, they will resist. However, if you seek to understand their needs and respond to these, you will find them more cooperative.

    Start by listening

    To achieve this you must really listen. It is not enough to pay to pay lip service to the idea of listening. You need to hear what they have to say and look for ‘points of pain’ where your ideas might actually help them.

    Tailor the way you communicate your agenda

    The idea is to tailor the presentation of your ideas so that it can be seen to benefit the other party, rather than forcing them to reluctantly agree. This involves some creative thinking but is possible if you really understand their needs.

    Show the other party what benefits you can offer them

    Remember it is not enough to explain how your ideas will help you or even others. You have to demonstrate how it helps the person you are speaking to.

    For example do not say to your client:

    Users are going to love this new feature.

    Instead say:

    This new feature will keep users coming back and that will dramatically improve the number of leads you receive.

    Once you understand the other party and are thinking about their needs, the next step to form a relationship with them.

    Be personable

    If you have a good relationship with your users, boss or client they are more likely to follow your suggestions.

    Obviously the kind of relationship you build is dependant on who the other party is. Your relationship with website users is different from your relationship with the boss. However, there are certain approaches you should always consider:

    Get them nodding

    It’s a silly little thing but when I go to pitches I try and get people nodding. If they start nodding it is a good sign. However, more than that it put them in a positive mood.

    I normally achieve this by repeating back to them (in different language) a point they themselves have already made. This is obviously something they can agree with, but also demonstrates that I was listening and that we are on the same wavelength.

    The same approach can be used online. For example if I am writing a post aimed at web designers, I know that berating IE6 will start them nodding in agreement. I have succeeded in making a connection.

    Be enthusiastic

    Enthusiasm is such an important tool. Clients want to know you care about their project. Bosses want to know that you are motivated to work and users want to know you care about the service you provide.

    However, so many people lack enthusiasm when communicating their message. They either come across as defeated before they start or as overly aggressive.

    A better approach is to go in with overwhelming enthusiasm. People get caught up in enthusiasm. It is infectious. However, most importantly it is hard to say no to somebody who is exuding enthusiasm and excitement from ever pore. It would be like kicking a puppy :-)

    Mirror them

    You have all heard how mirroring somebodies body language helps establish a positive connection. Whatever you do, do not do it! If it is done as a conscious action it just comes across as creepy! It will happen naturally, so do not worry about it.

    That said it is a useful indication of whether a face to face meeting is going well. If the other party is mirroring your body language, then the chances are they like you.

    What is more interesting is that you can mirror people’s language.

    Try and use the same terminology as the other party. If your boss or client talks about return on investment or success criteria, ensure you do too. Equally if your user is not familiar with certain language, make sure you avoid it.

    The way we speak associates us with a certain ‘tribe’. If we share the same language we are more likely to build a rapport.

    Make them smile

    A final trick I use for building relationship is to inject some humour into proceedings. If you can make the other party smile, you are a long way to breaking down any barriers that may exist.

    Of course, this has to be used with some care. Overdo it and you look like the fool. However, even the most miserable looking board of directors are human beings and like to smile.

    Although all of these approaches are great for building relationship there is one that trumps them all – openness.

    Be open

    You maybe reading this thinking “this guy is mad, what if his clients read this stuff. Won’t they feel manipulated?” My answer is no. I am being open and honest about what I do. I would be entirely happy for any one of my clients to read this because there is nothing manipulative or hidden here. People hate being deceived and so if anything the honesty in this article will build my relationships, not undermine it.

    I believe there are two key components in building open relationships that lead to a receptive audience.

    Disarming honesty

    Many times the best approach is to diffuse potential conflict with disarming honesty. For example I regularly acknowledge in sales situations that I am there to sell and that they should take anything I say with a pitch of salt.

    The client would obviously know this already. However, admittedly it verbally is the kind of honesty people rarely encounter.

    When designing a website it is important to be upfront with users too. For example if you are asking for somebodies telephone number on the website, do them the courtesy of admitting that it is because you want to contact them.

    A willingness to show weakness

    We can sometimes be so desperate to make our point that we become unwilling to admit even the slightest weakness in our argument. However, ultimately we come across as pig headed and inflexible.

    People respond well when you admit that you are wrong or if you are unsure of an answer. Be willing to say I do not know or I have messed up if appropriate. People will respect you for it.

    One of the best examples of this is Flickr’s blog post “Sometimes We Suck” in which they apologised for performance problems. By taking this approach they demonstrated their integrity and completely defused the anger of those complaining.

    Of course, being willing to show weakness takes a lot of confidence and that is a trait desperately needed if you are going to convince others.

    Be confident

    As humans we are drawn to confident leaders. We follow those who have a clear vision and who walk that path with confidence.

    It is therefore important to communicate your message with confidence. Establish yourself as an expert and talk with authority. People will respond to this.

    However, confidence is not the same thing as arrogance.

    Confidence not arrogance

    Being confident also involves having the confidence to admit when you are wrong. A truly confident leader does not claim to have all of the answers all of the time. Conceding points and being willing to allow others to express their views is a key component of confidence. Only those who lack confidence fear an opposing view being expressed.

    You do not need to always win

    Pick your battles. It is okay to concede some points to achieve your greater aim. It does not undermine your position to give ground. Sometimes you need to play a submissive role to get people on board.

    Don’t allow your ego to get in the way. If it makes somebody feel good that they have won an argument then they are more likely to be consolatory when you suggest an alternative.

    Some degree of compromise is okay. It is certainly better than being negative and constantly rejecting counter proposals.

    Be positive

    Whether dealing with your boss, a difficult client or your users, you need to impress them with your attitude and service.

    You should always remain helpful and keen to leave a positive impression. Sometimes that involves going the extra mile in customer service. Other times it means finding some positive aspect in your bosses latest mad scheme.

    Whatever the situation, the worse thing that can happen is you get a reputation as somebody who is unhelpful and negative.

    Conclusions

    You will probably have gathered by now that my title is somewhat misleading. There are no Jedi mind tricks here. At the end of the day the secret to persuading others is to show them respect, listen to their opinions and seek ways of presenting your vision in language that they can understand and benefits them.

    185. Innovate

    On this week’s show: We talk about Google Chrome Frame, how to be an innovator, and measuring the success of your website.

    Play

    Download this show.

    Launch our podcast player

    Housekeeping

    Win Pitches, Charm Clients and Get Signoff

    Being a great designer or developer is only half the battle. You also need to be able to promote and sell your services. Unfortunately many web designers and freelancers struggle to engage with clients.

    The problem appears to be so big and I get so many questions on the subject that I have teamed up with the guys at Carsonified to run a full days workshop on the subject.

    It takes place on the 23rd of October in London. If you book soon the price is £375 although if you quote the code CWPB_09 you can get an additional 15% off.

    Book Your Place Now!

    Shopify Design Competition

    Shopify (who sponsor the show) are running a design competition to find the best designed Shopify store.

    They want your help picking a winner and so are giving away either a 15″ Macbook Pro or one of 20 iPod Nanos to encourage you to participate.

    All it will cost you is a quick tweet and an opportunity to look through some stunning ecommerce websites. It is an excellent source of inspiration if you are considering adding a store to your website.

    To vote go to win.shopify.com.

    Back to top

    News

    Google Chrome Frame

    Google have just released Google Chrome Frame for IE in an attempt to improve Internet Explorer. But will it have a real world impact?

    Read my thoughts on whether it will make a difference.

    A List Apart on Search

    The latest issue of A List Apart is a bumper edition with three well considered posts on various aspects of search.

    What makes these articles particularly interesting is that they are not about search engine placement. In fact they are not about external search engines at all. All three posts are about making better use of your internal search engine.

    My personal favourite is “Internal Search Analysis.” This post focuses on the wealth of information that can be gathered by monitoring your internal search engine. By looking at what people search on, when they search and what they do once they have searched, you can learn a huge amount about your users and the effectiveness of your site.

    However, the benefits do not stop there as “Beyond Goals: Site Search Analytics from the Bottom Up” demonstrates. The emphasis of this post is on how analysing internal search can dramatically alter your approach to content.

    The final post is “Testing Search for Relevancy and Precision.” This focuses on the fact that site search is often not developed with the consideration and care it deserves. It provides methods for establishing the most important site queries and then checking that those queries lead to relevant content.

    Together these three posts provide an excellent introduction to site search and should be required reading for anybody running a website.

    How social marketing is changing business

    There is a lot of BS written about the subject of Social Media. To be honest I am not a great fan of the term. However, it is changing the way we interact online and in particular it is changing the way organisations are interacting with their users and customers.

    Mashable posted an article this week entitled “4 Ways Social Media is Changing Business” that really drives home this point. What is more, if this post is to be believe social media is changing business for the better.

    The author identifies 4 positive changes that social media has had on business. These are:

    • A move from trying to sell to making connections
    • A shift away from large campaigns to small acts
    • An emphasis on being ourselves rather than controlling our image
    • An effort to be constantly available to users

    The one that interested me the most was the “small acts”. Facebook, Twitter and other social media websites allow us all to reach massive audiences, and so the need for million dollar campaigns are increasingly a thing of the past.

    At the same time users have the ability to make their experiences of interacting with you heard by a large audience quickly and easily.

    This means it is the small acts of excellent customer service that matter. Get those right and you create a passionate enthusiastic following who will do your marketing for you.

    Anyway, it is an inspiring read and if you are struggling to “get” social media, you might want to take a look.

    Prototyping and the design process

    With websites becoming increasingly complex and expensive to build, the need to prototype is paramount.

    Unfortunately there are so many ways to prototype a design, from simple hand drawn sketches to entire working prototype. It is often hard to know which is the best approach.

    Integrating Prototyping Into Your Design Process” is a post on Boxes and Arrows that seeks to bring clarity to the different way of prototyping a site.

    The post talks in terms of fidelity. Visual Fidelity, which refers to how close the prototype looks to the final design. And functional fidelity, which is how closely the prototype reflects the way the site will work.

    The post goes on to identify different types of prototyping and where they fall within this spectrum. For example design comps have a high visual fidelity but a low functional fidelity, while an interactive wireframe will have a lower visual fidelity but will be functionally better.

    However, the majority of the post is taken up comparing and contrasting the benefits of different prototyping approaches and asking when these are best used.

    It is a useful post because it helps you pick the right tool for the job. Even the smallest web project can have some form of prototyping and so it is applicable to everyone.

    Back to top

    Feature: How to become an innovator

    Whether you are a website owner, web designer or web developer you need to innovate. But how do you make it happen?

    Read ‘How To Become An Innovator’

    Back to top

    Listeners feedback:

    Measuring success

    This week I twittered the following little fact I found through macworld:

    43 per cent of UK companies admit that they have no quantifiable method of measuring whether their website is effective.

    Shortly thereafter Stelian responded with the following tweet:

    How can you measure if your company’s website is effective for the business? if you don’t own an online shop.

    It is a good question. Its easy to establish measurable goals when you building an ecommerce site. However it is much harder if it is an informational or service based site. Nevertheless it is not impossible.

    Every website should have an objective that the owner wishes to achieve. It might be to communicate an idea, rally support or generate leads. Whatever the case these objectives need to be converted into calls to action. What is it you want users to do?

    These calls to action will vary depending on the type of site. However, typically they include things like:

    • Picking up the phone
    • Completing a contact us form
    • Signing a petition
    • Subscribing to a newsletter
    • Watching a product demo

    The list could go on. What is interesting is that almost all calls to action are measurable. If a user completes a contact form, that is trackable. If a user watches a product demo, that is trackable.

    The hardest calls to actions to track are those that leave the website. Typically these are phone enquiries or going to a physical location. However, even these are trackable with some careful planning. Discount codes or free gifts are a great way of getting users to identify they came from the website. For example:

    Print this voucher and take it to one of our stores for a free t-shirt.

    The phone is even easier. In this case you can have a unique number that is only found on the website. If the user calls that number, you can be sure they came from the website.

    The point is every website should have measurements by which its success can be judged. Without these success criteria it will be largely directionless and will certainly struggle to justify further investment.

    Back to top

    How to Win Pitches, Charm Clients and Get Signoff

    Being a great designer or developer is only half the battle. You also need to be able to promote and sell your services, unfortunately there is little advice online about how to do this effectively.

    The most common questions I get asked focuses on selling web design services and getting client approval. In short many web designers and freelancers struggle to engage with clients.

    The problem appears to be so big and I get so many questions on the subject that I have teamed up with the guys at Carsonified to create a full days workshop on the subject.

    Where and when

    The workshop will take place on Friday 23rd October from 9AM to 5PM at the RIBA London.

    We have limited the workshop to only 20 places so there will be lots of opportunities to discuss your particular challenges.

    I will also be hanging around afterwards so there will be opportunity to go out and socialise too!

    Who should attend?

    This workshop is aimed at web freelancers, web design and development agencies and anyone involved in generating new business and maintaining and developing existing client relationships.

    What Will You Learn?

    Here is the agenda for the day. Hopefully that will give you an idea of what we will cover…

    Shameless self promotions
    • What does not work?
    • The benefits of specialising
    • How to specialise
    • Selecting your target audience
    • Reaching your target audience
    • Demonstrating your expertise
    • How to make the most of social sites
    The perfect proposal
    • How to price a project
    • What to include in a proposal
    • Should you provide speculative design?
    • When to walk away
    The pitch
    • Who should attend?
    • What makes a client want to hire you?
    • How to generate confidence
    • Engaging with clients?
    • Learning how to engage
    • Making the most of your time slot
    • Dealing with difficult characters
    Sales through relationships
    • Why repeat business matters
    • How to foster repeat business
    Dealing with difficult people
    • The techie
    • The hard man MD
    • The price negotiator
    The importance of establishing a good working relationship
    • Where it goes wrong
    • The benefits of getting it right
    Changing the client/designer relationship
    • How to become the expert
    • The importance of positivity
    How to communicate better
    • Speaking the clients language
    • How much does the client need to know?
    • Methods of keeping the client informed
    Running the perfect kick-off meeting
    • Controlling the agenda
    • Educating the client
    • Defining roles
    • Explaining the process
    Doing your research
    • Business objectives and success criteria
    • Target audiences and personas
    • Competitive analysis
    Dealing with design
    • The importance of a design methodology
    • The tools of design development
    • Understanding the clients perspectives
    • Developing a site persona
    Presenting work
    • When to present
    • Methods of presenting
    • Who to present to
    • Techniques for presenting
    Managing feedback
    • Dealing with politics
    • Tackling committees
    Dealing with difficult people
    • The existing client
    • The no clue client
    • The micro manager
    • The marketeer

    How much?

    So if you are interested in attending? If so don’t pay the full price :-)

    The first 10 places are only £375, but you can also get a discount if you use the code: CWPB_09. This will give you 15% off that price.

    If you decide to book drop me an email as I would love to chat beforehand!

    Book Your Place Now!

    177. Back in business

    On this week’s show: Paul and Marcus talk to Brett Welch about the business of web design, and Paul chats with Ryan Taylor about creating a buzz.

    Play

    Download this show.

    Launch our podcast player

    Twitter post: Decided I like the boagworld podcast much more when @stanton and @ryanhavoc host it. Odd.

    Oh right, I see! I’ll get my coat!

    Back to top

    News

    The web font showdown

    There has been a lot of exciting developments in the world of embeddable web fonts. It doesn’t look like it will be long before having custom fonts on our websites will be a reality.

    We already have the likes of Cufon, which appears to be a huge improvement over the flash based sIFR technique. We also have Jeff Veen’s Typekit coming soon. This promises to give us access to a large number of fonts using nothing more than CSS font-face and some Javascript.

    However, this week has also seen clearleft’s announcement of Font Deck, a direct competitor to Typekit. The rumour is that it will differ from Typekit because it will not rely on Javascript. Exactly how this will work is currently unclear. There is also a possibility it will use the same kind of caching approach Google Code offer for Javascript libraries. If it does this will significantly improve the perceived download speeds of fonts.

    Although Font Deck is arriving a little late to the party, ultimately it will come down to who has the best selection of fonts. Until we know that there will be no clear winner.

    That said, judging by an article on Think Vitamin, Typekit looks pretty impressive. The article demonstrates how Typekit will work and I have to say it looks very straightforward. Unsurprisingly for an application developed by Jeff Veen, it is incredibly well designed. However, it is not perfect. The demo page associated with the post shows a significant delay as custom fonts are loaded. Until that is complete the user sees a web safe font. Unless they seriously ramp up their server capability this delay could get even bigger as the popularity of their service increases. This might possibly be the opportunity that Font Deck needs to leapfrog their competition.

    Moving design forward

    Web design has come a long way from the grey backgrounds and blue and purple links of just a few short years ago. But where do we go from here? That is the topic tackled by Jennifer Farley in “Art Direction: Taking Web Design To The Next Level.”

    As you will guess from the title, Jennifer’s answer is Art Direction. Art Direction is (among other things) the process of bringing together design and content. This is something sadly lacking in modern web design. Most websites are designed with little understanding of what content they will finally contain. Design is built around a series of templates integrated into a content management system. There is little customisation of the design to work with the content of each page.

    Jennifer shares some examples of sites that endeavour to move beyond the template mentality and introduce real art direction. They are definitely worth looking at as they will inspire you to move beyond template design.

    Jennifer’s article is not the only post that encourages a change in our approach to design. The other is a post from 37 Signals entitled “Stop following directions and start designing.” This post encourages designers to view feedback from the client as suggestions rather than solutions. The author writes…

    When you’re getting direction from a client, manager, art director, etc., it is easy to fall into the mode of just following instructions. You get so caught up in getting it right that you forget to keep thinking about the problem.

    Of course it is totally understandable to take the ideas of those that pay our bills as gospel. But we should also be reminded that those same people hired us for our expertise.

    That is easy to say when you work for a company that does not have clients! That said, it is good advice and worth taking on board.

    Being persuasive

    My favourite post of the week is “50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive.” Although not strictly to do with web design it provides a lot of advice that can be applied when trying to nudge users in a certain direction.

    For example one of the techniques suggests personalising the herd effect. The herd effect is used regularly on websites as a way of nudging users to complete a particular call to action. For example it is not uncommon to see ‘popular products’ on ecommerce sites or ‘average donation values’ on charity sites. This is because we tend to be led by the crowd. If somebody else did something then we will too.

    However, the post suggests taking this step one step further  by personalising the message. It cites an example from a hotel change…

    The hotel sign in the bathroom informed the guests that many prior guests chose to be environmentally friendly by recycling their towels. However, when the message mentioned that majority of the guests who stayed in this specific room chose to be more environmentally conscious and reused their towels, towel recycling jumped 33%, even though the message was largely the same.

    So instead of refering to popular products you would say “other users who bought this product also bought this”. This is a approach also used regularly by ecommerce sites like Amazon.

    This is just one example from a massive list included in this post. It really has a wealth of knowledge that is applicable to almost all aspects of web design from information architecture to copywriting.

    Continued confusion over HTML 5 and XHTML 2

    The last few weeks have been full of discussion about HTML 5 and the demise of XHML 2. There seems to be a lot of division and confusion over what designers and developers should be doing. Should we be abandoning XHTML 1.0. and moving to HTML 4? Should we try and adopt HTML 5 even though it is in draft? Its all very confusing and I have to admit I’ve felt unsure myself.

    Fortunately there are some very clever chappies giving out excellent advice. Jeremy Keith has written an excellent post on the subject, as has Bruce Lawson. Drew McLellan has also contributed some interesting points to the discussion.

    The problem is that it is all pretty turgid stuff and a bit of pain to wade through. The good news is that you don’t have to. Brad Colbow has saved us from this pain by turning the whole discussion into a very easy to follow (and bueatifully designed) comic strip.

    Extract from the comic strip

    SO, if you want to know whether you should be closing your tags and whether you can start supporting HTML 5 now, then pop over to smashing magazine and take a look.

    I won’t ruin the end, but I will say you won’t need to change the way you code.

    Back to top

    Interview: Brett Welch on the business of web desgin

    Paul Boag: So joining me on the show is Brett Welch. Good to have you on the show.

    Brett Welch: It`s good to be here.

    Paul: Thank you for agreeing to do this on very short notice. Because I didn`t notice your talk. We`re still at Future of Web Design. I`m still interviewing people here. You’re going to get bored of me saying that cause I’m doing loads of them. I didn’t notice your talk on the line up so I almost missed you entirely and I didn’t hear you either. So I haven’t heard what you said. But I’ve had lots of people come up to me saying you are interviewing Brett right? He’s really good. So you obviously went down very well. Which is a good thing.

    Brett: That’s a good thing yeah.

    Paul: Because I missed it what did you talk about?

    Brett: Okay. I talked about how designers can go beyond pushing pixels and start to create more effective website for their clients. So I talked about the business end of web design. Which you know a lot of the time gets ignored at conferences like this.

    Paul: Sure does.

    Brett: And I think it’s really important. Cause that’s where the money flows into their pockets. So when it comes to actually getting the client on board and that process. That’s a really important part that I thought needed talking about. I talked about how designers can do that and I used and acronym called BUSTA and I put a bit picture of Busta Rhymes up there because if you’re into rap and hip hop you’ll know the guy. Not that he’s had any hits recently. As far as I know. BUSTA stands for talk Business. Understand why they want to go online. Talk stragety. Talk business targets and set an Action plan.

    Paul: Okay.

    Brett: So there’s the B-U-S-T-A. Or in one sentence you can say. Businesses Understand Strategy Tactics and Action. So all together it sorta works as sort of a nice little coat hanger for your thinking. And the idea really is to start off by talking about a clients business. What do you do? How long have you been doing it? How do you sell what you sell? Sort of getting into the business owner’s mind a bit. I think that’s something that you need to do to set the tone of what you are going to talk about. It’s not about a pretty website. It’s about having something that actually is effective for the business owner. The next thing is really understanding what they are trying to achieve. That’s important because you may need to dial up their expectations or dial down their expectations.

    Paul: Okay.

    Brett: Sometimes people if they’ve read a few blogs. They’re thinking that they’re an expert. They’re thinking that they can take it to the next level really easily. Sometimes you need to slow that down a bit and say hold on. You’re not going to be Amazon overnight. You need to take it slow. Other guys are going to be a bit timid. I don’t really know much about bespoke stuff. That’s where you need to hold their hand a bit. Guide them to understanding how exicted they should be. So the next part is strategy. I made a big point about the fact that strategy is not dirty word. It’s really just about connecting the dots between their website and their business. It’s about understanding how you can achieve the goals you want to achieve. Through their website. The main thing about stragety is really helping them understand what they can achieve. and showing them how they can achieve it with concrete targets. That’s what where T comes in. T is your targets. There I think you need to set 3 to 5 concrete targets business targets that actually relate to things like revenues and customer leads. Things like, not traffic. I actually made a point of saying not traffic. Traffice doesn’t mean anything until you understand what your conversions are like. It’s great to say 1000 people came to my website. If you’re not actually getting leads out of that. That are captured in some sort of database or if you’re not making money out of the sales. It’s an empty number. Then finally was action. So you need to set some short, medium and long term goals. A plan. The tools. The what and the how really. How are you going to get there? I think that was a rough overview of what sort of B-U-S-T-A is all about.

    Paul: Okay. So what are the benefits of using this kind of approach. As a freelancer say. Why do I need to worry about this kind of stuff?

    Brett: I think that even the process, if you look at it from the other point of view, from the business owner’s point of view, it’s still an important one to go through. A lot of people don’t realize that you probably need a marketing plan for your website. Because how else are you going to get people to view it? It’s just like opening a bit store. You need to put in the same amount of effort and ongoing effort to get a result. So I think the why is really more effective websites. If you think about what you’re doing in a business oriented way what’s going to come out the other end is going to be a much more refined and polished representation of what you want to achieve. It’s going to work better for you. I think you get from a freelance point of view you get less arguements from clients. They say I don’t like that blue and you can say well that blue will get you better conversions.

    Paul: Right so you’re going back to the stuff you established.

    Brett: Exactly. You established already so you can link it back. Obviously you need to have a valid point. You can’t just make things up.

    Paul: Well you can try.

    Brett: You can try. The real key thing is you can close arguements off by, the silly ones anyway, saying ‘hey look this is better for these reasons.’ Trust me.

    Paul: The way we often talk about it is it moves aways from personal opinion of like I don’t like this colour to well this colour comes out of this set of things that we agreed up front.

    Brett: Exactly. It’s drawn from this business goal. Then the other ones are you get repeat business because you’ve set that action plan. You’ve got long term and medium term goals that they’re going to link back to you. So once your first sections done and they sort of say ‘This is working well.’ Then they go who’s the next person to talk to? Obviously the same person cause you’ve had them actually plan.

    Paul: It’s interesting we went up to a pitch on Tuesday and it was for a small little job, a design job, and we went through this pitch and we outlined what we do. We got to a point in the pitch where we said ‘But if this is as far as you’re going to go don’t hire us.’ If you’re only looking in short term views of this immediate project then we’re not the right people for you. But here’s where we think you should be going over the long term. And I think ultimately that’s really beneficial. It means that your going to get that long term business that you’re talking about.

    Brett: Absolutely. People want to know what’s next. I think being able to answer that question ‘What’s next?’ is really a key to making them come back to you when it’s time to implement what’s next.

    Paul: How far do you think you can go on that line? We do a lot of work with public sector clients I remembe sitting in one meeting when they wanted to establish a 5 year plan for the website. Which to me seemed unrealistically far ahead. How far do you go with things like that?

    Brett: If you can imagine 5 years ahead I think congratulations. I think that’s great. The main thing is not so much how far you can think ahead. I think it’s really the exercise of thinking ahead that is most valuable. Whether it’s a 6 month or 12 month or a 2 year or a 5 year plan. However far you can get that’s great cause you probably have a fantastic imagination. Right now Twitter is big in 5 years who knows what it’s going to be?

    Paul: Exactly.

    Brett: You can work those into your plan. It’s great to sort of skecth something rough out for as far as you can think ahead. I think it’s the exercise that makes the, it’s the process that makes it more effective and more polished. The outcome just becomes more effective in the wash.

    Paul: What you don’t cover in that B-U-S-T-A analogy is, you don’t talk about user testing and user feedback as a tool to convince clients to do a particular thing. I’m guessing that’s part of your process as well.

    Brett: Well I think that’s really important. It’s not specifically part of B-U-S-T-A cause usability…

    Paul: Yeah it would ruin the whole…

    Brett: I think that when you talk about two things Targets well three things Strategy Targets and Action. Those last two, if you’re going to achieve the targets you want to achieve then that’s where you need to, and the action plan, doing that testing and doing that side of things is a really important part of making sure you can achieve those goals. I’m a big fan of usability testing and I read your article on ThinkVitamin. What was it?

    Paul: I don’t remember. I write so many of them I get confused.

    Brett: It was like cheap usability…

    Paul: Oh yes I remember that.

    Brett: That was like fantastic and I like tweeted it. It’s the sort of thing that I’ve definitely fit in and the actions and the targets. Because targets are about conversions and actions are about how are you going to get those conversions. I think usability is really a big part in working out those conversions. It’s like supermarkets. They have the aisles and they put the products in the right places because they want the kid to scream about the cholocate at the last minute. It’s all well thought out and on a different level it is usability. It’s arranging things in a way so the client behaves in a way, or the customer behaves the way you want them to behave. So I think it’s an essential part of the process. I didn’t fit in talking about it.

    Paul: You can only fit so much in.

    Brett: That’s for sure.

    Paul: It was very impressive that you did it in only 10 minutes. Obviously there are real benefits to using this approach in regards to convincing clients of stuff as we’ve already said. You know you can say well we’ve gone with this colour because of these reasons etcetra. Do you think there is also a value from a sales point of view in terms of up selling yourself and giving yourself more credibility and value?

    Brett: Absolutely. That was final point that I didn’t manage to get to about why you’d follow a process like this. It’s simply higher profits. What I’m saying is nothing particularly new or ground breaking. It’s really just a simple process that helps you get your head around these things. So that you’re able to more effectively how valuable what you do is and basically end up with a more effective result which sort of is a feedback. If you do something, if you sound like you do something well you do something well. Then it sort of feeds back and they’ll tell their friends and it’s sort of a marketing for yourself. So I think that having that process really is just about being able to up sell and justify. The problem that we’ve got right now and I talked about this briefly in the talk as well, is that design is becoming a comodity. People view design as a comodity. That’s a real shame. It is about up selling. It’s about selling yourself, the value you have and effectively communicating what you do. In a way that puts you in the right light so that people are willing to pay the money for it.

    Marcus: It also makes you seem like more of the expert.

    Brett: That’s exactly it.

    Marcus: We actually tell people who say we’re not doing this obviously we feel this is the right thing for your business to take this kind of consultative approach but it benefits us as well. We tell people upfront it’s a benefit to us as well. And they’re like oh okay I see this is helping everybody.

    Brett: Yeah that’s right. I think there is two things, one of the key questions we have right now that every freelancer has to ask themselves is are you worth it? Are you worth your cost? I think the two things that are worth it are strategy. Being strategic and being an expert because experts know things that you don’t. If you can get both of those things into your pitch then whatever you do you’ve already put yourself on a different platter. I think that’s where you really, and we tell this to our designers, we have a large community of resellers for GoodBarry and we tell them all the time, we have training sessions, we always talk about making sure you really lay out what they want to do, how they want to do it, and link it back to their business so that they can really put themselves at that expert level and justify the price.

    Paul: I think there is also an issue here of the fact that clients like to be reassured. That when you’re buying from somebody you want to be reassured that this person knows what they are doing.

    Brett: It’s about trust.

    Paul: Having a methodology and an approach that you work through and has all of the different things that you just outlined. I think gives you, it gives clients that reassuring feeling that these guys know what they are doing. They’ve got an approach and they always use this approach and are comfortable with that.

    Brett: I think that it’s not just about the followig the process by wrote necissarily. It’s about, or each design or freelance person or agency has their own specialties. I think at a broad level you can follow it. But there are some parts where you may dig deeaper because that’s your real expertise area. These processes are meant to be used and bent. Adapted to whatever your situation is.

    Paul: So where do you think the time is to start talking about these processes? Is it once the client as signed on the dotted line? You take them through or do you encourage people to be talking about this even at the pitch stage.

    Brett: I think at the pitch stage. When you’re pitching you need to demonstrate, not necissarily tell them the name of your process what your following, the methodology. But start to go through the process and say look I want to talk about your business so lets do that. Then I want to understand why your going online. Then I want to talk with you about strategies we can use, and targets that work for you. Then we’re going to talk about how we’re going to achieve this. Just by setting out that roadmap I think you’re already putting yourself miles ahead of everybody else who’s gone right to what sort of colours do you like? I think right in the pitch stage. You don’t want to go into too much detail. I think you have to strike a balance between showing them that you know this stuff really well and that you can really help them achieve these things but also leaving enough behind the fence so that there is something they’re actually going to pay for. That’s the trick is that balance. I would always fall more on the side of making friends with the client and sort of making them understand the process and how great they can be. How effective they can be. Rather than holding too much back.

    Paul: I think the other benefit talking about this, I don’t know what your attitude is towards this but, it’s actually quite a good arguement agains speculative design work as well. If you’re in a position where your talking to a client and they’re asking for speculative design you can almost say well in a way this isn’t the time to do it because I haven’t understood your business. We haven’t set targets. We haven’t got a strategy here. So you can take them through the logic of why it’s too early for me to start putting designs in front of you. Is that something you’d agree with?

    Brett: Totally. I’m not sure what our official company stance would be. I don’t think we’ve really talked about it. On principle I definitely agree. In our reseller training we teach stuff like that. I would have to say that I, yeah I use 99designs as an example.

    Paul: Oh that’s where Ryan’s comment. I heard Ryan’s comment right at the end.

    Brett: I said designers if you want to see we broke it down we had millions of designs and millions of dollars put in there and you crunch the numbers and it works out that every design that is gone and done is worth $2.80. That’s lower than minimum wage. You can go work at McDonald’s and do better than that. I think that, yeah I’m not a fan personally of speculative design. I would generally say and what we teach our resellers as part of our training is saying don’t go with that. We want to go in and understand the business. Make sure that you get your head around what they want to do because your work needs to reflect that.

    Paul: I realize I haven’t asked you about GoodBarry at all. What do you guys do? I haven’t come across you before.

    Brett: We have a platform for running online businesses. When you’re going online these days business owners want to be able to run their website. Email marketing is more and more important. Selling products and hooking into Paypal and things like that is harder than it needs to be. Behind all that, having a CRM database that you can track your customers and save them in a central place when they sumbit a webform or interact with your site however they interact. We’ve got a platform that does all of that.

    Paul: Wow!

    Brett: Our system does everything that’s in sort of that realm. It’s great for web designers because they’re able to actually create any design and put it on the system. Use all of that functionality without doing any programming. So that’s sort of what we sell. We have a reseller program. That’s why we’re here. We get designers on board to become resellers of our product. Basically they use the product they get comissions. They get a whole bunch of training from us about how to make more money and how to, pratical training. How to be a reseller. We not only take you one as a resller we want you to be able to add value to your clients. And give you some ideas about how you can do that.

    Paul: Interesting business model. Well thank you so much for coming on the show. That was really useful.

    Brett: That was really fun.

    Paul: It’s nice to hear some other people saying the things we rant on about week in and week out.

    Marcus: That’s what we rant on about all the time.

    Brett: Yeah I saw your talk at FOWD in New York.

    Paul: Educating Clients to Say Yes.

    Brett: It really struck a chord. It’s like this is what I am talking about. I think we’re definitly on the same page.

    Paul: Excellent.

    Thanks goes to Curtis McHale for transcribing this interview.

    Back to top

    Listeners feedback: Creating a buzz

    Paul: So we’re going to do something a little bit different for the listener feedback section today and it’s come about because I was chatting with Ryan Taylor via IM and he asked a particular question and I nearly turned round to him and said “Ah, you can pay for one of my consultancy clinics for an answer to that question” but then I thought that might be a bit tight of me of me, so instead I thought, lets talk about that on the show because it’s a really good issue to discuss and its a different way of doing the listener feedback and I think we’ll probably do it with some other people in the future as well. So I have Ryan on the show, hello Ryan.

    Ryan: Hello Paul.

    Paul: Oh I’m so honoured to meet you, your the guy that does that podcast aren’t you?

    Ryan: I am, I’m the one who makes sure it doesn’t sink like a lead weight.

    Paul: It’s so exciting, I feel quite in owe of this amazing super start that I have on the show.

    Ryan: *laughs*

    Paul: Can I have your autograph?

    Ryan: Of course, you’ll have to come up here though, I’m not coming down there.

    Paul: That’s a bloody long way to go isn’t it? Can’t be bothered with that.

    Ryan: Aye, you have us come down there often enough.

    Paul: Yes this is true.

    Ryan: *laughs*

    Paul: But you live up north, it’s dangerous there.

    Ryan: It’s not.

    Paul: There’s wild animals and thugs and things.

    Ryan: It’s all rumour and hearsay.

    Paul: I see it on the news all the time.

    Ryan: If you weren’t such southern softies you’d be alright.

    Paul: And also isn’t there loads of pollution from the factories chucking out toxic gases and stuff.

    Ryan: Yeah well you see though, if the ice caps melt and we flood, your going to go first because we’re higher up than you.

    Paul: That is true. Yeah but whenever I think about the north I always have this image of a post apocalyptic barren waste land anyway so it’s all swings and roundabouts.

    Ryan: That’s Scotland, you’re going too far north.

    Paul: *laughs*

    Ryan: *laughs*

    Paul: Anyway, it’s really good to have you on the show. I actually listened to last weeks show which was sold waffle but very entertaining none the less.

    Ryan: Well we try our best.

    Paul: *laughs* It was good, I really enjoyed it. I particularly enjoyed the horrendous swearing after the outro music.

    Ryan: Oh, Anna’s just so good at all the editing she does, it was constant throughout, I really feel sorry for her.

    Paul: She worked hard on that one.

    Ryan: I had to ring her up an apologies personally for that one.

    Paul: *laughs*

    Ryan: *laughs*

    Paul: Yen, we were chatting on IM and you asked a question do you want to share what you asked? Or what the issue was?

    Ryan: well, erm, as you know I’ve been recording my own series of video interviews called please start from the beginning and you were the first person I interviews.

    Paul: ah, it was very boring. Have you started editing them down yet? Or have other people been more concise?

    Ryan: they are getting long

    Paul: oh shit really.

    Ryan: I think Dan Rubin holds the record at 50 minutes

    Paul: flip me!

    Ryan: well has also been the most interesting interview, has also received the most hits and the most traffic.

    Paul: really?

    Ryan: yep, everybody likes to hear Mr. Rubin waffle

    Paul: I Marcus should be pretty good when you get to do him because of his whole pop-star career.

    Ryan: he keeps putting me off you know…everybody I can get hold of his the hardest one to nail down. I’ve been asking him since the weekend in June and I’ve done 10 interviews now and I just can’t nail him down.

    Paul: So the basic principal of the show is that you ask people about their past and ask them how they got where they got.

    Ryan: Yeh, its nothing technical it’s something a little different in that I want to know what people do now, what their job title is is the first question I ask, Because I think it’s interesting to hear about what peoples different job titles are because there are so many different bearings of the same thing in the industry. So I ask that first and discuss what they do now, and then ask them to go back to the beginning as per the title of the series and take me through their career path. All the experiences they had all the lucky breaks they had, achievements and so far it’s working out really well.

    Paul: Cool

    Ryan: Yeh, people seem to like talking about themselves.

    Paul: yeh, it’s funny that. So as we were chatting, do you want to say what your question was, what was it you were getting at, what was it you wanted from me?

    Ryan: the question was how can I kind of advertise the series a bit better, how can I get more people watching it. The uptake so far has been really good, I’ve had some really good feedback and people are kind of linking to it and spreading the word a little on twitter. But for a lonely guy like me with less than 400 followers it’s hard when I tweet and you’ve only got potentially 400 people that will see it. You know the number of people coming to the site is good it’s better than I’ve ever had, but I’d like more people seeing the videos and commenting and just spreading the word. Someone like yourself with 9000 followers it’s very easy for you to spread the word about thing and I was wondering how you built your way up with Boagworld? If I do something similar, starting from the beginning.

    Paul: yeh, I think this is a problem most people have they’ve got some particular website or application or service that they are offering and wanting to build up a bit of a buzz. I’m not that high up the food chain if you compare me with Mr Carson or some of the guys over in America who seem to find it very easy to create buzz and excitement about products. But I guess I’ve picked up a few things that have worked for me. I think the first one is struck me is patience, you know you haven’t been doing it that long have you?

    Ryan: Well no, not too long. So far we’ve released the 8th video and it’s been steady. The kind of traffic interest has been steady level, it’s not like a huge, it not going up every week. You know we release Monday and obviously get a surge of traffic on a Monday as everyone comes to visit. That tails of towards the end of the week and then the next Monday we get another surge of traffic and I suppose there is going to be more traffic with more interest of people who are more in the public eye. Like Ryan Carson for example. There will be a spike in traffic I would have thought. But everybody just seems to like everybody which is quite interesting. So it seems to be the same every Monday, there seems to be the same amount of traffic coming to watch that video. Despite whom the person is.

    Paul: well that to some degree might be down to be how much the person interview is actually pimping what you have done. You’ve got a good model in the sense you’ve got a situation where your interview well known individuals which works really well as a technique because if they do mention it and push it themselves then it’s going to drive traffic to your site and hopefully get people hooked on the other ones. Erm, but ye hi mean that’s only kind of part of the equation actually. To be honest it was a long time before I actually saw much traffic on Boagworld at all. I mean I reckon it was over a year before I got much over the 400 / 600 subscriber numbers. So it was a long long time before anything really happened, you just really need to keep plugging away and releasing regularly and often. You’re on ITunes now aren’t you?

    Ryan: yes, I finally got the series on ITunes and the uptake of that has been pretty good as well, you know people jumped on that straight away and that’s slowly increasing which is nice. Yeh searchable on iTunes and please start from the beginning.

    Paul: this is sounding like a massive big plug for free start from the beginning; on the other hand it is also useful stuff for other people because other people are on the same kind of position. We’ve given one tip which is produce content which has got expert whom has a big following, because they are going to talk about it which is a good thing. I mean the other thing that I think a big part of it is, is your own reputation aswel. That (erm) it’s easier for me, if I launch something new … I don’t know let me say I started a new podcast or website it will be relatively easy for me to create some buzz around that because I’ve already got 9000 followers on twitter, because I already know other people and friendly with names that will actually promote it themselves, If I ask them too. So your own reputation matters quite a lot as well and your building up quite a good network of people you know, and don’t be afraid to ask those people to pimp it a little bit. This is where your really going to see the pay off from all the conferences and meeting and chatting with people. Because you’ve become a name that people are aware of, so there’s another tip. Take the time to build up your own personal brand and reputation and attend conferences, because people will take more of an interest in you. Take this week clear left have realised font-deck, now because it’s clea

    Ryan: left that’s done it they’ve had far more publicity than some other web app that has just been launched, does that kind of make sense?

    Ryan: yeh, yeh, absolutely. Erm I suppose it’s a bit like anything, your reputation again takes time doesn’t it. (

    Paul: yeh) I have this slight fear of ramming it down some people throats, I want people to come visit the videos and participate without really feeling harassed into doing so. (

    Paul: mmmm) So I don’t want to be tweeting all the time about it and things like that. I’ve been looking at some people who retweet and nearly everybody i’ve interviewed tweeted to say there is an interview there. So if and when people see that tweet they tend to click through, it’s for people who maybe miss that tweet. It seems to be that twitter is the main thing that is driving traffic to my site for my series, and I was wondering if there was anything else I could be doing to advertise it and get people to find it naturally?

    Paul: That’s the trouble isn’t it with twitter, something will get missed because you’ve just got this stream of stuff. I think there are a few things to say on that before we move on to other things you could do. Erm, I will actually tweet about something multiple times but I will subtly different ways ok. So for example I will initially (say in your case this video) then later in the day I will I maybe quote some of the comments have been made on the video. I will refer back to it a couple of days later, you know i’ve been pleased with the level of traffic or whatever. Just in order to bring it up a few times so that’s one thing that I do. The other thing is pick your times for actually tweeting about it, and that’s where something like using bit.ly like where you can track traffic is really worthwhile. Erm, because that enables you to kind of monitor the different links that your tweeting out, and notice which time of day gets the best level of traffic for you. So for example in my case I know that if I tweet around about between 5 and 8 in the evening UK I will get the most click through on whatever I do. And the reason for that is the people in UK have just finished work and are at home having their T and are checking twitter whilst they are there. They’ve got time to look at stuff, but yet in America that are following me are just waking up and are around now and their traffic is added to it in addition. So thinking about when you twitter is quite important as well.

    Ryan: well that’s interesting because i’ve been releasing the episodes around about 11.30 just before lunch so people could watch over lunch if they wanted to.

    Paul: yeh but that doesn’t particularly support the American audience and that is a big audience. I mean you’ve been interviewing people in America as well so I think it’s more important for you (

    Ryan: mmm). The other thing you might want to do is, the people that speak that you’ve got coming on the show I presume you write to them and email them when their show goes live…or at least you should do (

    Ryan: yes I do). Right include in that the embed code, in case they want to put the video on their site, because that then enable them to have some content, it’s easy and quick to put up on their site and will give you more exposure. And it’s on their blog so it’s permanent, rather than twitter which disappear in time, so that maybe a good way of doing it. (How else can I do build buzz) I mean the other part of it is building the community as well. That is at the moment you’ve just got the early days, and you’ve got visitors (

    Ryan: yeh) rather than actually a community. For example I now have people that come back to my site whatever I post. So I mean you want to look at building up that community in the comments and the stuff like that. You want to give people the opportunity and making people feel involved in it. So you do that by saying “hey who should I interview?”, or “what questions should I ask them?” erm, encourage people to put comments on the video maybe ask them questions in order to encourage that commenting. That’s always a good thing you can do. And then of course in addition that as well maybe run a competition where you get people to write in and suggest themselves, why you should interview them not just interview web celebs. Interview some ordinary designers as well, people that have been in the industry from the beginning but aren’t necessarily well-known names. So anything to kind of draw the community together, because once people feel like they are involved in you know Boagworld or from the beginning, once they feel like they’ve got an ownership in then they will start to promote it themselves and that’s where word-of-mouth recommendation really comes in because people are really enthusiastic about it.

    Ryan: ok that’s a good idea; I have been trying to contact and target people not necessarily big. I know the majority of people i’ve been interviewing are web celebs i’ve been trying to get all different kinds of people and different kinds of profession in the industry. So I’m trying to get a copywriter and a journalist for industry, and all the different people and their takes on the industry and how they ended up getting involved in it. To try and get as much of a diverse catalogue of people as possible. So ye hi like that idea of getting people, because as you say people don’t have to be a web celeb or a big speaker or a speaker or an a-list person to have an interesting story of what they have been doing. So yeh I like that.

    Paul: The other aspect to this is looking for influencer’s o those are individuals that have a big network and a lot of influence. Going back to say twitter for example a lot of people go on about you’ve got 9000 follower or 12000 followers or whatever. But actually the number of followers is less important than erm who is following you. And if you can kind of get at and influence (no wrong word) if you can get certain key influencers to mention your product or service or website then they will reach a much bigger audiences o for example you take someone like Jeremy Keith as a good example of this. His number of followers is actually less than mine yet the people that do follow him are in turn big influencers themselves, so he’s as much of a big influencer if that makes sense?

    Ryan: yeh, it’s kind of quality over quantity

    Paul: yeh, exactly, totally. Erm, what else? (Mumbling) could you do? … I mean the main thing is just a time thing it has to be said, you just have to keep plugging away being regular posting, not giving up on the project because a lot of people do that you know, especially with blogs. They do it for a while and they give up because they aren’t getting the returns they want out of it. And you know maybe try writing for things like smashing magazine or sitepoint or the webdesigners depot and write about career paths that are relevant to that what it is your doing. The guys at smashing magazine are always looking for new articles because they have this beast that needs feeding on a daily basis. I know you’ve tried to write some stuff for .net mag but I have to .net mag isn’t the best place to start because they are monthly publication which means they can be a lot more picky about what they have in. Also they are very reliant on big names, while you don’t care about the name it’s about this particular product. And actually have got less of a reach (fewer subscribers) than something like smashing magazine or webdesigners depot so I would try and go to write for some of them.

    Ryan: mmm that’s another interesting idea, the whole idea from this series stemmed from the fog around job titles and you know how people just kind of pick a name for themselves, like yourself web strategist (

    Paul: chuckles, yeh) you know it’s so ambiguous all the time and that’s where people starting out in the industry. That’s what it started off as; people don’t know what they want to be because there is no kind of defined roles.

    Paul: that’s what we spoke about on last week’s show.

    Ryan: absolutely that’s really where this started and that why I started putting this series together so the series is great that it’s self promotion of myself. But it started off from an interest and it still is, and I’m enjoying doing it because it interests me knowing about other people’s career paths and that’s why I like it. I want to interview interesting people that don’t necessarily have to be hugely popular people. So ye hi like that idea about writing about them, I think that will be the natural progression when i’ve got a few more interviews and bit more raw data to work with. An article about career paths will be something in the pipeline.

    Paul: I mean the back log of material really important as well (

    Ryan: yeah) , because I mean i’ve got people that start from show one that are still working their way through, and obviously that increased the number of hits and visitors, because people are going back episode after episode. The other thing you’ve got to think about which is the big problem that I had which is the one of getting it transcribed so that its good from a search engine point of view as well as an accessibility point of view. But you know that’s a big old challenge doing that until you’ve got a community like I’m fortunate enough to have that are helping out and supporting it, it’s really difficult to do that.

    Ryan: absolutely.

    Paul: but anyway I think at that point we ought to wrap it up else this will be the longest show ever recorded, but hopefully there was some useful stuff in there for you and other people. Giving you a little hint at how the consultancy clinics work.
    I think I may like to do this again so if you have a web project or you want some advice on something whatever it is then write in to [email protected] and once in a while we’ll pick one and do an interview like this. What do you think good idea Ryan?

    Ryan: yeh really good idea I think people will find it useful.

    Thanks goes to Andy Kinsey for transcript this listeners question.

    Back to top