You're a publisher, start acting like it.

As website owners we put out an increasing amount of content through a variety of mediums. However, are we doing so in a strategic way or are we in danger of alienating our audiences?

Twitter, facebook, youtube, blog posts, forum threads, press releases, emails… the list could go on. We are constantly talking about how important it is to communicate with our users through these various routes. However, many website owners fall into two categories:

The “I’m too busy” content provider – These are the people who just don’t ever seem to have the time to communicate. They want to, and recognise how important it is, but other work always sweeps aside their good intentions.

The “over enthusiastic” content provider – These individuals are passionate about engaging with their users. They are constantly tweeting, blogging and communicating. However, as a result they often overwhelm their users with too much content.

Then there is the problem of larger organisations who have many different content providers all trying to talk to the same audience. Much like the “over enthusiastic” website owner, multiple content providers can quickly overwhelm the user with too much ‘stuff’.

Whichever group you feel the biggest affinity with the solution is the same: You need an editorial calendar.

What is an editorial calendar?

An editorial calendar is something that has existed in the print world for years. It is essentially a master calendar that dictates what is published when and ensures there is a good spread of relatively constant communication on different topics.

For example your editorial calendar might dictate that blog posts go out on tuesdays and thursdays or that you try and tweet 10 times a day with major announcements put out at specific times when you know your audience will be looking at their twitter stream.

The form this calendar takes is entirely up to you. It could be a whiteboard, excel document or something more sophisticated. Whatever the case it provides some tangible benefits to your communication strategy.

Why you need an editorial calendar?

There are good reasons why editorial calendars have been used in print for years and why web content strategists constantly encourage their customers to adopt them. Here are just a few of the benefits that sprung to mind when I was planning this post. Editorial calendars…

Use the optimal time to communicate

An idea for an engaging tweet may occur to you at 10am UK time. However, if you want to reach an american audience you will have to schedule the update to go out later in the day. An editorial calendar would take into account the best time to reach your audience.

Controls the flow of information

As I have already said it is easy to overwhelm users with too much communication. It can easily begin to feel like spam. However an editorial calendar will enable you to see at a glance just how much you are communicating with users and decide whether it is the right amount.

Ensuring you are in the minds of users

The other extreme from overwhelming users is allowing them to forget you are there. An editorial calendar makes sure you are communicating with users on a regular basis rather than in concentrated bursts. This ensures that when the user next has a need for your services they will turn to you rather than your competition.

Gives you time to prepare content

Once you have an editorial calendar in place you do not need to constantly panic about what to write next. You have a schedule that allows you time to think and prepare for upcoming topics. In short you are much more in control of the process.

Keeps you communicating

With many other responsibilities above and beyond the website, it can be hard to stop content production from slipping down the list of priorities. By having an editorial calendar that includes deadlines and release dates, it ensures that your online communication receives the kind of priority it deserves and is not sidelined by “more important” work.

You create expectation among your users

Because your editorial calendar ensures you are releasing content on a regular basis your users begin to expect to hear from you. For example if you release a blog post every Thursday they will start to check back to see what you have written.

Hopefully I have now demonstrated the value of having an editorial calendar. The next question therefore becomes “what goes into an editorial calendar?”

What should your calendar include?

The exact make-up of your editorial calendar will vary depending on your type of organisation and the target audience you are trying to reach. For example if you are trying to reach business users then regular updates to LinkedIn are probably more relevant than updates to twitter. Equally if you work in a slow-moving industry on large projects that take years to complete then your editorial calendar would not include daily updates to your blog.

However I think there are three rules that any editorial calendar should abide by. These are:

Different content for different audiences

If you are attempting to cater to different target audiences with different needs, ensure that your editorial calendar reflects this. This means ensuring that each audience receives content for them on a regular basis rather than intermittent bursts when you suddenly remember you haven’t communicated with a particular audience for a while.

A mixture of different delivery mechanism

It’s also important that your editorial calendar does not just focus on one delivery mechanism. Different users prefer different methods of communication and your editorial calendar should cover everything from blog posts to status updates and e-mail marketing.

Variety in content types

Be sure you also include a variety of different content types. For example when blogging make sure you have a mixture of at least some of the different blogging styles below:

  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Third party links
  • Lists
  • Q&A sessions
  • Short form posts
  • Articles
  • News

Obviously this is not a comprehensive list. However it should give you an indication of how important it is to vary the presentation of your content if you are to keep users engaged.

There is so much more I could write on the subject of editorial calendars. However I want to conclude this post by pointing you at one or two tools I use to deliver a rudimentary editorial calendar myself.

Tools that help

Now I should probably confess that although I recommend editorial calendars to my clients I’m not great at sticking to one myself. Admittedly this somewhat undermines this post but writing it has encouraged me to be more disciplined.

Fortunately I have many of the tools in place to enable me to do this. Below I just want to highlight three that I find particularly useful.

WordPress editorial calendar plug-in

The WordPress editorial calendar plug-in enables you to see at a glance when upcoming posts are going to be released. Used by sites such as smashing Magazine and copy blogger, this plug-in gives you a bird’s eye view of all your posts allowing you to plan the best time to release new content.

WordPress editorial calendar plug-in

HootSuite

However it is not just blog posts that need to be scheduled. You also need to schedule the release of status updates on various social networks. By far the best tool I found to do this is HootSuite. I have already reviewed HootSuite on this blog so I will not repeat myself here. However it is sufficient to say that it allows you to schedule status updates both via its web interface and iPhone application.

HootSuite.com

Tweet this WordPress plug-in

Tweet This WordPress Plugin

Finally I would like to give a quick mention to the Tweet this WordPress plug-in. This plug-in allows you to schedule automatic tweets to go out at the same time as a new blog post is published. Although I’m not a fan of automated status updates I happily use Tweet this because it enables me to personalise the tweets that go out with each post. Effectively it allows me to schedule tweets to coincide with the release of a new post.

Next step

So as I’ve already said writing this post has inspired me to get more organised with my own editorial calendar. Hopefully it is done the same for you. I guess the next step for both of us is to sit down and workout realistically how often we should be posting each day and using what tools. We must walk a fine line between not taking on more than we can realistically deliver, while at the same time ensuring that we communicate regularly with our audience.

As I also said earlier there is a lot more that could be written about editorial calendars and I would encourage you to do so in the comments. I’m no expert in this area and I’m sure a lot of you have something to add. Please post your thoughts below.

User experience is not just about your website

As web designers and website owners we obsess about user experience. However, good user experience is about a lot more than having a great website.

Meet Jill. Jill is in the market to buy a reasonable quality digital SLR. She’s fed up with her point-and-shoot camera and wants something a little more sophisticated. However Jill doesn’t want to rush into a purchase as digital SLR’s are not cheap. Instead she has been researching the options online.

Jill holding her camera

Video

Eventually she discovers a video review on YouTube for camera that looks perfect. The video has been produced by a company called “Professional Cameras”. The review was very thorough and provided her with all the information she required.

Search Engine Optimisation

Once settled on which camera to get Jill searches Google to find the best price. Among the search engine results she sees “Professional Cameras” again. They are not the cheapest, but because she was so impressed by the video she decides to take a look at their site.

The website

The website was incredibly useful. It was well-designed, easy-to-use, and answered all the questions she had about purchasing from “Professional Cameras”. However by this stage Jill was keen to get her hands on her new camera and didn’t want to wait for it to be delivered. She decided she was willing to pay a bit extra to buy it from her local Currys. She got in her car and drove into town.

Mobile website

Much to her disappointment none of her local shops stocked the particular camera she wanted. However she remembered that the “Professional Cameras” website said something about next day delivery for a small additional charge. Although there were other cameras in Currys she didn’t want to settle for second best. So while still in store she used her iPhone to connect to the “Professional Cameras” website. She was delighted to find that they had an easy-to-use mobile version of their site that made it incredibly straightforward for her to place an order. Within 2 minutes she was done and the camera was due to arrive next day.

Support forum

Jill excitedly waiting for the camera to be delivered the next day. As promised it arrived on time and she was over the moon. She spent most of the day out snapping pictures, but when she returned home that evening she discovered a problem. Unfortunately no matter how much she tried she could not get the camera to transfer photographs to her computer.

In desperation Jill returned to the “Professional Cameras” website and visited the support forum looking for help. Unfortunately she couldn’t find the answer she wanted and because it was outside business hours she was unable to contact the supplier.

Social media monitoring

In her frustration she posted a tweet expressing her dissatisfaction with “Professional Cameras” even though she knew that it probably was not their fault. She was just so disappointed.

On logging in the following morning Jill discovered that somebody from “Professional Cameras” had responded to her tweet apologising for the problem and suggesting that she either calls customer services or uses the live chat facility on their website.

Customer services

Jill decided to use the live chat feature because she hated talking on the phone. She was blown away by the customer service she received. They offered to replace the camera no questions asked. However they suggested that a software update may solve the problem. Using the features built into the live chat they took her to the appropriate page and showed her how to download the drivers. This solved the problem and Jill went awayhappy.

An ongoing relationship

Jill was so impressed by the service she received from “Professional Cameras” that she decided to like their Facebook page and tell her friends about the excellent service she had been given. Most importantly when she received future e-mails from the company suggesting alternative products that she might wish to consider she was not so quick to consign them to her junk folder. In fact it turns out that the e-mails she received were incredibly targeted and suggested a number of excellent accessories and provided her with tips on how to get the most out of her new camera.

The moral of the story

So why do I tell you the story of Jill? It is to demonstrate that users online relationship with a company extends far beyond the website. More importantly it is vital that the different aspects which make up this online relationship work well together. Traditionally website owners have employed a web designer to build their site, an SEO company for their search engine rankings and marketing people to deal with social media and e-mail. However often this can lead to a fragmented approach.

If we are really to provide customers with an exceptional user experience it is vitally important that we provide a unified experience which involves the various specialists working together in extremely close relationship. It is time to look beyond the website and see the larger picture that makes up a great user experience.

If you recognise that the mobile web is important and you need help deciding on a strategy, then book a mobile consultancy clinic.

Book a consultancy clinic or contact Rob about a more in-depth review.

Managing your social networks with Hootsuite

Managing multiple social networks in a corporate environment with more than one contributor can be challenging. Fortunately Hootsuite can help.

There was a time when all we needed to worry about was our website. Now we have cater for users on numerous social networks and monitor what people are saying about our brands online. Constantly checking Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and other social networks can be incredibly time-consuming. That is where HootSuite comes in.

But what about you? What tools have you been using to manage social networks for your business? Perhaps there is something better than HootSuite. Let me know in the comments below.

How not to alienate visitors who just want to talk

Too many websites owners are more concerned with gathering data from their users rather than initiating a dialogue. If your users want to talk to you, don’t make it difficult.

It’s an age old gripe amongst web users. The over-long form. Field after field of questions and tick boxes when all we want to do is ask a question. A simple question:

‘When is this product likely to be back in stock?’

But still we are asked for our fax number, postal address, age, marital status and whether we have any ‘dependents under 18 living with us’ The mind boggles.

Now we’ve lived amongst marketeers long enough to realise that this is their work. This is an opportunity to gather as much profiling data about a consumer as is possible in order to

  • assist in customer relationship marketing
  • better inform the brand of their audience’s habits
  • aid new product development
  • a combination of the above

While I’m no fan of these forms, I count myself as at least 30% marketeer and am therefore aware that in my experience alone, this data has always gone to good use. To providing a better service / product / experience.

What I find remarkably absent though, is the website owners willingness to engage their audiences in a dialogue on their terms. I accept that I the website owner would like all this information, but do I deserve it? Do I? Well, in a lot of cases, no, you don’t.

If I want to open a dialogue with a brand via their website, I want it on my terms, and I often care little about the future requirements of that brand, no matter how earth-shattering my responses might be to a short questionnaire.
To that end I thought I’d give a few examples of how we can build better websites, where we deliver dialogue to our users, rather than just delivering data to our clients. And then perhaps, we can make people care about our needs, by good old customer service.

Social Networks

If you feel your audience have a significant presence on these networks then be sure you do. Publicise how to get in touch with you on these networks, and when people do respond in a timely fashion. If that is there chosen way to make initial contact, then respect that, and in time you will build their loyalty. Answer queries and in time if that prospect decides to enquire about your product or service then they will call and you can ask all the ancillary questions you might have then. By that point they are a hot prospect and already favourably disposed to you and will do so willingly.

social networks icons

Telephone Numbers

Provide one. Always. There are people out there who will always prefer to call. I know because I am one. And if that is their choice, then do not put obstacles in their way. Don’t make someone search endlessly through the site to find it. Don’t make them read pages of FAQ’s and Knowledge Base articles before presenting a phone number after one last click of a ‘Was This Information Useful – Yes/Know’ button. Make it easy to open a dialogue, and then if you have a genuine need for profiling data then you can always ask if they would mind asking a few questions over the phone.

After you have answered their questions first of course.

telephone

Contact Forms

If we haven’t already said enough about these already, then some further observations. Your customer has a query about you. The very least they need to raise (IMHO) are the following:

What my query is:

  • How would I like to be contacted regarding this?
  • When am I likely to get a response?

Now this is a very slim form by anyone’s standards. But at its core is the idea that you are putting as few obstacles in your audiences way as possible, and providing them with a chance to choose how they are contacted and informing them as to when that will be. Deliver on those last two and you are in business. Again, the dialogue is made easy, and is delivered on your audience’s terms.

Wufoo

Ask Questions

Why is this one so often overlooked? You have a CMS. You might even have a blog. You might even have comments enabled. You want to know some information about your audience, and yet you still build forms so convoluted that to ask a one line question I must still answer 10 unrelated ones. Ask questions of your audience on your site. Add them into comments on your blog. And provide an email address where if they would be so kind, they might want to send their thoughts / ideas about such and such. Again, any dialogue is on their terms. Entered into at their own will, with as much or as little effort required as they see fit.

Credit Where Credit is Due

Quite often a customer will ask good question about your product. You provide them with a swift answer and then pat yourself on the back for your helpfulness and timely response. The trouble is you have scores of similarly confused customers you could also benefit from the same help. So post the question on your site – ‘Mr Andrews of Lambeth asked a great question – where do I find the off switch on this petrol chainsaw?’ – Well, it’s on the handle, just by the power cord. Thanks Mr Andrews!

Credit your audience with asking a valid question, and then broadcast that to your other clients. Some of the best customer service is born out making public that you are only human and like everyone else, sometimes make mistakes.

Sign saying thankyou

Mind Your P’s and Q’s

Be grateful. For goodness’s sake, be grateful. As Paul has said in the past, people are aware that their opinions and their data has a value to brand / business owners, and so if they give their time and their opinions to you free of charge then the least you can do is be grateful. If you are a small business or a start-up, then this could be the only chance you might have to have a one-on-one relationship with your customers. If you deal only to 10 or 20 clients then you have no excuse really not to have a close relationship with them and to provide a good customer experience. Larger organisations have to use a more automated approach down to sheer volume. But even these, in fact primarily these, can benefit greatly from making their experience suit the user, rather than the website owner.

Sample feedback form

So there it is. Think for a minute about what is really going to drive the sales process. Are you a more profitable business because you know all there is to know about your prospects, or because you are accessible and helpful when dealing with your customers? Do you deliver what they want, or what you want? Is your website a barrier to real contact, or is it a conduit for it?

Food for thought.

Website owners need more than web designers

Why is it many website owners are changing their web designer even when he or she has built them a great looking, usable website? What more are they looking for?

The prevailing wisdom within the web design community is that you should specialise. However, does that really make sense? Is that what website owners are looking for? I would argue it is not.

Website owners have an increasingly difficult job. Not only do they need to provide visitors with an engaging, usable and accessible website, they also have to interact with them through social media, great content and other online marketing channels.

Think about it for a moment. The most effective online strategies consist of at least the following elements…

  • An effective website
  • Email marketing
  • Google Adsense
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Youtube

Website owners also have to worry about…

  • Business strategy
  • User profiling
  • Competition analysis
  • Site promotion
  • Site analytics
  • Calls to action

The list could go on.

When faced with such a daunting task they do not want a specialist. What use is an expert in ruby on rails when faced with such a broad and complex set of issues?

The need for generalists

They need generalists. They need people who can advise them on the breadth of challenges they face.

The specialist argues that they can hire multiple specialists to handle these different areas. However, who brings the pieces of the puzzle together? The website owner? I would argue this is asking too much.

Large numbers of suppliers create serious logistical problems, not to mention the potential for shifting blame. Most website owners want a one stop provider who can advice them on the whole range of challenges they face.

Being a web designer in this new decade is about more than building websites. A web designer will need to have a good understanding of business practices, site analytics, marketing, copywriting, social media and more.

Admittedly those who advocate specialising encourage people to have a T shaped knowledge. In other words web designers should have a superficial knowledge of all areas and a deeper understanding of one.

Although I can see the value in this approach as a way to ensure you work well with other specialists, I do not think it will meet the needs of most website owners.

Web designers need a deeper understanding of a broader set of areas if we are to be of real value to their clients.

The alternative is that website owners themselves have to develop this level of knowledge and that is going to be difficult for anything other than a full time website owner.

How then can a web designer broaden his or her knowledge? The answer is simple – start exposing yourself to a great number of sources of information.

Broadening your knowledge

Web designers should of course be learning about the latest CSS techniques and jquery plugins. However, they should also be reading marketing blogs, business strategy books and even attending copywriting workshops.

Here are a few suggestions to start off the budding generalist…

I know what you are thinking – “I don’t have time for that.” Well I am sorry to break the news but you have picked the wrong job!

The web is one of the fastest moving industries on the planet and needs an incredibly broad set of skills. If you don’t have those skills or fail to keep them up-to-date then you will lose credibility. You need to make time.

At the end of the day it is simple. Our website owners are asking for advice on everything from design to facebook and if we don’t give it to them then somebody else will. That is the reality of a consumer culture.

181. Interview or death

On this week’s show: how to avoid design by committee, why you shouldn’t bother submitting to Digg and how to specialise in being a generalist.

Play

Download this show.

Launch our podcast player

Housekeeping: .net awards

Boagworld has once again been nominated for the ‘Best Podcast of the Year’ in the .net Awards. In case you did not know the .net Awards celebrate the best in web design and development, and are brought to you by the world’s best-selling magazine for web builders – .net.

The winner of the .net awards is chosen by a panel of judges and a public vote. I would therefore very much appreciate it if you would take the time for vote for our podcast.

Back to top

News

The 7 deadly sins of blogging

I few weeks back I wrote a post entitled “10 Harsh Truths About Corporate Blogging“. The idea was to highlight bad practice in the way many organisations approach blogging. This week sees the release of a similar article entitled “The 7 Deadly Sins of Blogging“. Interestingly even though both articles tackle very similar subjects in a similar way, both of posts raise very different issues.

According to the article on Copy Blogger the 7 deadly sins of blogging are:

  • Selfishness – Focusing on what you want from your readers rather than what you can give them.
  • Sloth – Not being willing to put in the work that is required to run a successful blog.
  • Impatience – Expecting to see instant returns on the time invested in blogging.
  • Lameness – Producing poor quality uninteresting content.
  • Identicality – Copying the blogging styles of others rather than finding your own voice.
  • Irrelevance – Writing about something nobody is interested in.
  • Boorishness – Being that guy who just won’t shut up about his pet subject.
Its a good list and one that really makes you think about the way you approach blogging. However, ultimately I think it all comes down to the authors first point, selfishness. As she puts it – if you want to run a successful blog you need to:
Give. And then tomorrow, you give some more. And the next day, you give more.

UX Design – Myths and consistency

There are two user experience posts that I particularly want to mention this week.

The first deals with the lack of consistency users experience online. The post asks “Should There Be a United Set of Styles For Web Interfaces?” The author argues that operating systems encourage a degree of consistency by providing standard interface elements that can be easily utilised by third party developers. Generally speaking most mac apps use the OS interface elements and the same is true for windows.

The author goes on to propose that CSS 3 provides an opportunity to standardise the rendering of form elements across browsers so that whether you are viewing that element in Firefox or Safari it will look the same.

Although I like the concept it falls down on a number of levels…

  • CSS3 is not supported by IE6 at all.
  • Even in other browsers CSS3 support varies, meaning that the elements wouldn’t be consistent anyway.
  • In my mind using different browsers is like using different operating systems. You tend to only use one at a time and so consistency is not a high priority.
That said consistency is important. However, I think getting consistency across a single site is a more pressing aim, and one that many website fail miserably at.
The second post on user experience is far more practical and frankly useful. Entitled “Top 10 UX Myths” it blasts apart many of the common misconceptions about UX design. My personal favourites are:
  • People don’t change – Just because users didn’t scroll in 1994 doesn’t mean they don’t now!
  • Design to avoid clicks – Sometimes it is better to ask a user to click more than overwhelm them with too many options.
  • People know what they like - You cannot blindly give people what they ask for. Often there is a difference between what they think they want and what they actually like.

If you are a website owner I highly recommend you read this. If you are a UX designer than check it out. It will make you smile!

Typography – Stats, facts and sizing

There continues to be a lot of buzz around web typography this week with 3 posts/sites I would like to quickly mention.

Typographic Design Patterns and Best Practices

This is a Smashing Magazine post that researches 13 web typography questions. It addresses issues such as most frequently used fonts, the average size of body copy and how often links are underlined.

Although it is always interesting to see what others are doing, it is important to remember that just because a lot of people are doing something that doesn’t necessarily mean it is a good idea.

CSS Font-Sizing: a Definitive Guide

This Sitepoint post tries to bring clarity to the confusing world of CSS font sizing. As anybody who has worked with CSS knows, setting font sizes is not as straightforward as it should be. This post lays out the various options and then recommends an approach.

Obviously there are no absolute answer when it comes to this subject. However, this post does recommend some good practice and helps you understand the problems surrounding font sizing.

Typedia

This newly launched site  is essentially Wikipedia for type. This shared encyclopedia for type attempts to classify, categorise and connect fonts.

The site has a powerful search facility that allows you to search for fonts by foundry, typeface, designer and more. It also helps you better understand typography and has growing little community where you can discuss type (among other things).

If you are a typography geek, this is definitely worth checking out.

Volume does not equal success

Are you desperate to get on the homepage of Digg? Do you crave to be number one on Google? Do you monitor your visitor stats and page views continuously? If so, then I recommend you read Gerry McGovern’s latest post “Volume is the wrong way to measure web success .”

Gerry says you are looking in the wrong place if you want to measure the success of your website. He argues that it is not the number of visitors that matter, but whether you are providing users with what they need. In fact he even argues that an obsession with volume can be damaging to a site:

Measuring success based on volume encourages bad practice. The search engine optimization industry is often a prime culprit of such bad practice. A search expert I met once refused to remove out of date and clearly wrong and misleading pages from the site he was involved with because it would reduce search traffic volume.

For too long we have belonged to the Cult of Volume when it comes to measuring whether a website is successful or not. For an increasing number of websites, high volume traffic reflects the website’s failure to help customers quickly complete the tasks they came to complete.

Perhaps it is time to stop looking at volume as a measure of success and look instead to the completion of calls to action. Did users complete your contact form, signup for your newsletter or buy your product. In other words, did your website meet your business objectives and the needs of your users?

Back to top

Feature: Hold stakeholder interviews now or pay later

Committees are the kiss of death to any web project. Give the kiss of life to your dying project with some one-to-one interviews.

Read ‘Hold stakeholder interviews now or pay later’

Back to top

Listeners feedback:

Specialise in being a generalist

Colin writes: I’m a former web design company owner – I worked initially as a freelancer, the business grew quite quickly, I took on staff, and then gave it all up. The reason was because I couldn’t decide what role to focus on and ended up doing the vast majority of the work.

Web design and development seems to be a seemingly endless list of skills – but how do you decide which direction to go down, and how do you stay up on technology?

What if like me, i’m a jack of all trades, but master of none? What can I do to help me decide where to focus my efforts?

There is certainly a big push towards specialising. This is especially true if you are a freelancer looking to stand out from the crowd. However, I do not agree it is always true. It certainly hasn’t been for me.

I was once in a very similar position to Colin. When we started Headscape I was responsible for all the design and development we did. We began to grow by simply taking on more generalists like myself. However, the point came when we started to employ specialists. As the roles started to fragment I felt the need to make a decision. Just like Colin I asked what role I should adopt.

In the end I made the decision to specialise in being a generalist. With so many of the top level designers and developers specialising I saw an opportunity to maintain a broad overview. We had specialists within the company and so there was little need for me to personally specialise. By remaining a generalist I had the opportunity to improve internal communication, identify new areas worth exploring and have enough knowledge to speak intelligently to our clients on most issues.

My level of knowledge in any particular area varies depending on my personal interest. For example, I know only a little about flash development or server side coding. However, I know enough to get by and identify any potential problems.

I understand the need to specialise if you are a freelancer. However, if you are running a small agency who are employed to provide the complete solution to clients, then I think there is a need for you to be a generalist.

Sites like Digg are not worth your time

Mike asks: Should blogmasters submit their posts to digg and stumbleupon, or should we let our users submit them for us?

I don’t think there is a right or wrong answer to this question. However, personally I leave it to users to submit for me. The reason why? – I don’t think social sites like digg or stumbleupon provide much in the way of valuable traffic to my blog. They are simply not worth my time and attention.

It is actually not that easy to drive a lot of traffic to your blog through these sites. Sure, we have all heard about the Digg effect. However, getting highly ranked is hard. It is the submissions of a few prominent Diggers that dominate the homepage. The chances of your post getting picked up are relatively slim unless you happen to post silly videos or breaking news.

Even if your post is fortunate enough to gain a high profile on these site, the quality of traffic is low. The users visiting your site are interested in only one thing – the particular post. They are not interested in who posted it or the site it is hosted on. The chances of them turning into regular readers is almost zero. The chances of them completing a call to action even lower.

In my opinion it is better to take the time you would have spent submitting your post and invest it in making that post really stand out from the crowd. If your content is outstanding it will naturally attract an audience.

Back to top

10 Harsh Truths About Corporate Blogging

Every company in western civilization seems to have a blog these days. But are they worth it, and why are so many terrible?

I have reached the conclusion that most organisations have a blog simply because they feel they should. Many marketing departments fail to ‘get’ blogging and have poorly visited blogs with few comments. Because their blog fails to perform they conclude that blogging is an ineffective marketing tool and either remove it entirely or leave it to languish.

However, it does not need to be this way. Corporate blogs can be a powerful communication tool that builds brand awareness and nurtures a sense of engagement. You only need to look at the vibrant community surrounding the 37Signals blog to know that corporate blogging can work.

A screenshot of the 37Signals blog showing a large number of comments

This post asks the questions – why are most corporate blogs failing and why do the few succeed? To do this we need to face a few harsh truths.

1. A blog does not magically generate traffic

When companies first started launching corporate websites they perceived them as a marketing channel that would generate leads. They had a ‘build it and they will come’ mentality. Over time they realised that a website is more like a storefront. A few people might wander in off the street, but most of the time you need to advertise to attract trade.

Many marketing departments are making a similar mistake with corporate blogs. They perceive them as a way to generate new traffic, when that is not their primary role. Admittedly the keyword heavy nature of a blog will help your organic rankings, but that is a secondary benefit.

The real role of a blog is to generate repeat traffic which is considerably more likely to complete a call to action. A successful blog has a regular readership who is being constantly reminded of your brand and products.

Of course building up a readership takes time.

2. Blogging takes long term commitment

Building a readership is a long term commitment. It can take months for users to recognise your blog as a consistent source of useful information. Only then will they start visiting it regularly and recommending it to others.

It doesn’t just take time, it also takes commitment. That means posting regularly and to a schedule. Users are more likely to visit your blog if they know you release a post on a certain day each week.

Of course ultimately you want them to subscribe so they don’t need to continually check your site for new content.

3. Teaser feeds are a wasted opportunity

Users can subscribe in a couple of ways. They can either sign up to receive email notifications or subscribe to an RSS feed. This is a crucial step in engaging readers. That is because users are effectively giving you permission to  remind them about your site and brand.

However, it is remarkable how many organisations fail to grasp this opportunity. Instead of using the chance to push content to users, they only provide a teaser of blog posts. This means users have to click through to view the whole post.

This practice is born out of a false belief that users need to see your site. They don’t. Unless your revenue is driven by site advertising, there is no need for users to click through to read your blog.

The purpose of most corporate blogs is to build and maintain brand awareness while motivating users to engage. None of that needs to happen on site. The blog post itself builds and maintains awareness, while requests for comments or calls to action motivates users to engage. Users do not need to see the rest of your site to respond to the copy of a blog post. Of course for that to be true, posts need to be engaging.

4. Your not ‘engaging’ anyone

The most successful blogs are more than a broadcast tool. They are a dialogue between the individuals within your organisation and your users. It is important to listen, as well as speak.

Unfortunately the majority of corporate blogs fail to engage. Instead they focus on telling readers how great their products and services are. Rarely do they ask for feedback or ask questions. In fact it is not unusual for companies to disable comments for fear of criticism.

Instead you should be encouraging users to contribute to your blog through comments and constructive criticism. It is a superb opportunity to get free feedback from your customers, something many organisations pay market researchers for.

Part of the problem is that most corporate blogs offer nothing more than rehashed press releases.

5. Press releases shouldn’t appear on a blog

Let’s set aside the debate over whether press releases  have a role in today’s web centric world. Whether they do or don’t, you need to realise that a press release preforms a different role to that of corporate blog.

As the name implies a press releases is meant for professional journalists. It is designed to encourage journalists to write about your product or service. It is not designed for your customers.

A blog on the other hand is meant to be read by prospective and existing customers. It should be engaging, informative and helpful. When writing a blog post you should always have the end reader in mind. What will they learn? What insight will this give them into who we are? How will it help build our relationship with the reader? You should never simply copy and paste press releases or news stories.

The other problem with press releases is that they are corporate statements. A blog should have a more personal tone.

6. You sound like a faceless corporation

People don’t like interacting with organisations, corporations or machines. People like conversing with people. One of the things I have learnt about selling web design services is that once people have established that you offer a good service at a reasonable price, the next thing they care about is you. Do they like you? Do they trust you? Do they think they can work with you?

People don’t like, trust or want to work with corporations. We associated those feelings with individuals, not companies. It is therefore important that a corporate blog is about the people within your organisation, not the organisation itself. Your blog should focus on different people and the role they perform with your company. They should be able to demonstrate some of their personality as well as share their expertise.

A blog is a place to let readers see behind the marketing spin and glimpse the real people within your organisation.

7. You need to show the warts and all

If you are a marketeer this may all sound a little scary. Its hard to control ‘the message’ when you are blogging. You have multiple bloggers from across your organisation who are effectively becoming corporate spokespeople, and you are allowing users to publicly criticise you on your own blog. This is a long way from traditional marketing.

However today’s consumers are very savvy. They are distrustful of traditional marketing and can sense when they are being sold at. A softer approach is required, one that is more ‘real’ and less managed. One part of that is admitting when you make mistakes.

A screenshot of GetSatisfaction.com

Dell constantly ignored criticism they received about poor customer service. They ignored the voice that the web provided their customers, until eventually a single disgruntled user stirred up a major PR nightmare with a single post entitled ‘Dell lies. Dell sucks.

Contrast this with the ‘warts and all’ approach adopted by photo sharing site Flickr. When faced with community criticism over the poor performance of their website they wrote a post on their blog entitled ‘Sometimes we suck.’ They acknowledged the problem and laid out a plan for correcting it. This non traditional approach to their brand image allowed Flickr to quickly defuse a situation that could have grown out of control.

A blog post on flickr entitled 'Sometimes we suck'

Perhaps when it comes to corporate blogging, marketing is not always best equipped to handle the task.

8. Marketeers often make bad bloggers

Let me be clear. I am not saying that all marketeers should be banned from blogging. What I am saying is that traditional marketing skills are not always best suited to the medium. Because blogging should be personal, transparent and not shy away from an organisations flaws, it can seem an uncomfortable communication tool for some marketeers. Also the traditional writing style of many marketeers does not fit well with the informal style of a successful blog.

If you are a marketeer responsible for the corporate blog, look for ways to encourage others within your organisation to blog. Think of yourself as an editor rather than an author. Target people who are particularly knowledgeable or already act as spokespeople for your organisation. Encourage them to blog and act as a copy editor tweaking and refining what they write.

You may find it hard to encourage others to blog. If that is the case try interviewing them instead. You can then turn those interviews into blog posts and hopefully encourage them to respond to comments. But remember, whether you are posting an interview or an article, do not expect too much from your readers.

9. You expect too much from your readers

Most of the corporate blog posts I have read are long, text heavy and boring. They take considerable commitment to wade through. In short, they ask too much from readers.

With so many blogs online you need to make your posts stand out from the crowd. Always ensure users can get the gist of what you are saying by just scanning the post. This can be achieved using a number of techniques…

  • Summarise a post at the beginning and in the title. Don’t leave users guessing what the subject is.
  • Be controversial to grab users attention.
  • Use headings as a way of grabbing attention and summarising content.
  • Use images to break up the copy and communicate key points.

Do not feel all of your posts need to be an essay. Short posts that propose a question or draw the readers attention to another site are just as engaging. Anything that is of value to the user is worth posting.

Finally, remember that not all blog posts need to be textual. Consider buying a flipcam and recording some video interviews with people around the company. Record an audio interview or post some photographs of corporate events. Just don’t expect users to read lots of copy. The only people who do that are your competition.

10. Your competitors will read your blog – Get over it!

I am amazed at how many organisations will sensor their corporate blogs because they are worried their competition will read it and rip off their expertise and ideas. Although it is true that your competition will do exactly this, what is the alternative? One the primary opportunities a blog provides is the chance to demonstrate your expertise. People will be motivated to buy from you because they understand you ‘know your stuff.’ However, if you don’t talk about your expertise, how will they know? You might be the best in your field but if nobody knows it then what is the point?

I write about my knowledge of web design all the time. I know that many of those who read my posts are competitors and learn from what I share. However, I know a lot of prospective clients read the content too. Should I silence myself for fear of being copied or should I prove to my clients that I know what I am talking about? I think the answer is clear.

Conclusions

Many organisations are still finding their voice online and corporate blogging is one way they can achieve this. It is not surprising that they are still making mistakes. The secret to success is accepting that a blog is not a traditional marketing tool. In my opinion, it has more in common with a customer services. Once you realise that and release it from the shackles of press releases and corporate news, it will begin to generate return on investment.

177. Back in business

On this week’s show: Paul and Marcus talk to Brett Welch about the business of web design, and Paul chats with Ryan Taylor about creating a buzz.

Play

Download this show.

Launch our podcast player

Twitter post: Decided I like the boagworld podcast much more when @stanton and @ryanhavoc host it. Odd.

Oh right, I see! I’ll get my coat!

Back to top

News

The web font showdown

There has been a lot of exciting developments in the world of embeddable web fonts. It doesn’t look like it will be long before having custom fonts on our websites will be a reality.

We already have the likes of Cufon, which appears to be a huge improvement over the flash based sIFR technique. We also have Jeff Veen’s Typekit coming soon. This promises to give us access to a large number of fonts using nothing more than CSS font-face and some Javascript.

However, this week has also seen clearleft’s announcement of Font Deck, a direct competitor to Typekit. The rumour is that it will differ from Typekit because it will not rely on Javascript. Exactly how this will work is currently unclear. There is also a possibility it will use the same kind of caching approach Google Code offer for Javascript libraries. If it does this will significantly improve the perceived download speeds of fonts.

Although Font Deck is arriving a little late to the party, ultimately it will come down to who has the best selection of fonts. Until we know that there will be no clear winner.

That said, judging by an article on Think Vitamin, Typekit looks pretty impressive. The article demonstrates how Typekit will work and I have to say it looks very straightforward. Unsurprisingly for an application developed by Jeff Veen, it is incredibly well designed. However, it is not perfect. The demo page associated with the post shows a significant delay as custom fonts are loaded. Until that is complete the user sees a web safe font. Unless they seriously ramp up their server capability this delay could get even bigger as the popularity of their service increases. This might possibly be the opportunity that Font Deck needs to leapfrog their competition.

Moving design forward

Web design has come a long way from the grey backgrounds and blue and purple links of just a few short years ago. But where do we go from here? That is the topic tackled by Jennifer Farley in “Art Direction: Taking Web Design To The Next Level.”

As you will guess from the title, Jennifer’s answer is Art Direction. Art Direction is (among other things) the process of bringing together design and content. This is something sadly lacking in modern web design. Most websites are designed with little understanding of what content they will finally contain. Design is built around a series of templates integrated into a content management system. There is little customisation of the design to work with the content of each page.

Jennifer shares some examples of sites that endeavour to move beyond the template mentality and introduce real art direction. They are definitely worth looking at as they will inspire you to move beyond template design.

Jennifer’s article is not the only post that encourages a change in our approach to design. The other is a post from 37 Signals entitled “Stop following directions and start designing.” This post encourages designers to view feedback from the client as suggestions rather than solutions. The author writes…

When you’re getting direction from a client, manager, art director, etc., it is easy to fall into the mode of just following instructions. You get so caught up in getting it right that you forget to keep thinking about the problem.

Of course it is totally understandable to take the ideas of those that pay our bills as gospel. But we should also be reminded that those same people hired us for our expertise.

That is easy to say when you work for a company that does not have clients! That said, it is good advice and worth taking on board.

Being persuasive

My favourite post of the week is “50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive.” Although not strictly to do with web design it provides a lot of advice that can be applied when trying to nudge users in a certain direction.

For example one of the techniques suggests personalising the herd effect. The herd effect is used regularly on websites as a way of nudging users to complete a particular call to action. For example it is not uncommon to see ‘popular products’ on ecommerce sites or ‘average donation values’ on charity sites. This is because we tend to be led by the crowd. If somebody else did something then we will too.

However, the post suggests taking this step one step further  by personalising the message. It cites an example from a hotel change…

The hotel sign in the bathroom informed the guests that many prior guests chose to be environmentally friendly by recycling their towels. However, when the message mentioned that majority of the guests who stayed in this specific room chose to be more environmentally conscious and reused their towels, towel recycling jumped 33%, even though the message was largely the same.

So instead of refering to popular products you would say “other users who bought this product also bought this”. This is a approach also used regularly by ecommerce sites like Amazon.

This is just one example from a massive list included in this post. It really has a wealth of knowledge that is applicable to almost all aspects of web design from information architecture to copywriting.

Continued confusion over HTML 5 and XHTML 2

The last few weeks have been full of discussion about HTML 5 and the demise of XHML 2. There seems to be a lot of division and confusion over what designers and developers should be doing. Should we be abandoning XHTML 1.0. and moving to HTML 4? Should we try and adopt HTML 5 even though it is in draft? Its all very confusing and I have to admit I’ve felt unsure myself.

Fortunately there are some very clever chappies giving out excellent advice. Jeremy Keith has written an excellent post on the subject, as has Bruce Lawson. Drew McLellan has also contributed some interesting points to the discussion.

The problem is that it is all pretty turgid stuff and a bit of pain to wade through. The good news is that you don’t have to. Brad Colbow has saved us from this pain by turning the whole discussion into a very easy to follow (and bueatifully designed) comic strip.

Extract from the comic strip

SO, if you want to know whether you should be closing your tags and whether you can start supporting HTML 5 now, then pop over to smashing magazine and take a look.

I won’t ruin the end, but I will say you won’t need to change the way you code.

Back to top

Interview: Brett Welch on the business of web desgin

Paul Boag: So joining me on the show is Brett Welch. Good to have you on the show.

Brett Welch: It`s good to be here.

Paul: Thank you for agreeing to do this on very short notice. Because I didn`t notice your talk. We`re still at Future of Web Design. I`m still interviewing people here. You’re going to get bored of me saying that cause I’m doing loads of them. I didn’t notice your talk on the line up so I almost missed you entirely and I didn’t hear you either. So I haven’t heard what you said. But I’ve had lots of people come up to me saying you are interviewing Brett right? He’s really good. So you obviously went down very well. Which is a good thing.

Brett: That’s a good thing yeah.

Paul: Because I missed it what did you talk about?

Brett: Okay. I talked about how designers can go beyond pushing pixels and start to create more effective website for their clients. So I talked about the business end of web design. Which you know a lot of the time gets ignored at conferences like this.

Paul: Sure does.

Brett: And I think it’s really important. Cause that’s where the money flows into their pockets. So when it comes to actually getting the client on board and that process. That’s a really important part that I thought needed talking about. I talked about how designers can do that and I used and acronym called BUSTA and I put a bit picture of Busta Rhymes up there because if you’re into rap and hip hop you’ll know the guy. Not that he’s had any hits recently. As far as I know. BUSTA stands for talk Business. Understand why they want to go online. Talk stragety. Talk business targets and set an Action plan.

Paul: Okay.

Brett: So there’s the B-U-S-T-A. Or in one sentence you can say. Businesses Understand Strategy Tactics and Action. So all together it sorta works as sort of a nice little coat hanger for your thinking. And the idea really is to start off by talking about a clients business. What do you do? How long have you been doing it? How do you sell what you sell? Sort of getting into the business owner’s mind a bit. I think that’s something that you need to do to set the tone of what you are going to talk about. It’s not about a pretty website. It’s about having something that actually is effective for the business owner. The next thing is really understanding what they are trying to achieve. That’s important because you may need to dial up their expectations or dial down their expectations.

Paul: Okay.

Brett: Sometimes people if they’ve read a few blogs. They’re thinking that they’re an expert. They’re thinking that they can take it to the next level really easily. Sometimes you need to slow that down a bit and say hold on. You’re not going to be Amazon overnight. You need to take it slow. Other guys are going to be a bit timid. I don’t really know much about bespoke stuff. That’s where you need to hold their hand a bit. Guide them to understanding how exicted they should be. So the next part is strategy. I made a big point about the fact that strategy is not dirty word. It’s really just about connecting the dots between their website and their business. It’s about understanding how you can achieve the goals you want to achieve. Through their website. The main thing about stragety is really helping them understand what they can achieve. and showing them how they can achieve it with concrete targets. That’s what where T comes in. T is your targets. There I think you need to set 3 to 5 concrete targets business targets that actually relate to things like revenues and customer leads. Things like, not traffic. I actually made a point of saying not traffic. Traffice doesn’t mean anything until you understand what your conversions are like. It’s great to say 1000 people came to my website. If you’re not actually getting leads out of that. That are captured in some sort of database or if you’re not making money out of the sales. It’s an empty number. Then finally was action. So you need to set some short, medium and long term goals. A plan. The tools. The what and the how really. How are you going to get there? I think that was a rough overview of what sort of B-U-S-T-A is all about.

Paul: Okay. So what are the benefits of using this kind of approach. As a freelancer say. Why do I need to worry about this kind of stuff?

Brett: I think that even the process, if you look at it from the other point of view, from the business owner’s point of view, it’s still an important one to go through. A lot of people don’t realize that you probably need a marketing plan for your website. Because how else are you going to get people to view it? It’s just like opening a bit store. You need to put in the same amount of effort and ongoing effort to get a result. So I think the why is really more effective websites. If you think about what you’re doing in a business oriented way what’s going to come out the other end is going to be a much more refined and polished representation of what you want to achieve. It’s going to work better for you. I think you get from a freelance point of view you get less arguements from clients. They say I don’t like that blue and you can say well that blue will get you better conversions.

Paul: Right so you’re going back to the stuff you established.

Brett: Exactly. You established already so you can link it back. Obviously you need to have a valid point. You can’t just make things up.

Paul: Well you can try.

Brett: You can try. The real key thing is you can close arguements off by, the silly ones anyway, saying ‘hey look this is better for these reasons.’ Trust me.

Paul: The way we often talk about it is it moves aways from personal opinion of like I don’t like this colour to well this colour comes out of this set of things that we agreed up front.

Brett: Exactly. It’s drawn from this business goal. Then the other ones are you get repeat business because you’ve set that action plan. You’ve got long term and medium term goals that they’re going to link back to you. So once your first sections done and they sort of say ‘This is working well.’ Then they go who’s the next person to talk to? Obviously the same person cause you’ve had them actually plan.

Paul: It’s interesting we went up to a pitch on Tuesday and it was for a small little job, a design job, and we went through this pitch and we outlined what we do. We got to a point in the pitch where we said ‘But if this is as far as you’re going to go don’t hire us.’ If you’re only looking in short term views of this immediate project then we’re not the right people for you. But here’s where we think you should be going over the long term. And I think ultimately that’s really beneficial. It means that your going to get that long term business that you’re talking about.

Brett: Absolutely. People want to know what’s next. I think being able to answer that question ‘What’s next?’ is really a key to making them come back to you when it’s time to implement what’s next.

Paul: How far do you think you can go on that line? We do a lot of work with public sector clients I remembe sitting in one meeting when they wanted to establish a 5 year plan for the website. Which to me seemed unrealistically far ahead. How far do you go with things like that?

Brett: If you can imagine 5 years ahead I think congratulations. I think that’s great. The main thing is not so much how far you can think ahead. I think it’s really the exercise of thinking ahead that is most valuable. Whether it’s a 6 month or 12 month or a 2 year or a 5 year plan. However far you can get that’s great cause you probably have a fantastic imagination. Right now Twitter is big in 5 years who knows what it’s going to be?

Paul: Exactly.

Brett: You can work those into your plan. It’s great to sort of skecth something rough out for as far as you can think ahead. I think it’s the exercise that makes the, it’s the process that makes it more effective and more polished. The outcome just becomes more effective in the wash.

Paul: What you don’t cover in that B-U-S-T-A analogy is, you don’t talk about user testing and user feedback as a tool to convince clients to do a particular thing. I’m guessing that’s part of your process as well.

Brett: Well I think that’s really important. It’s not specifically part of B-U-S-T-A cause usability…

Paul: Yeah it would ruin the whole…

Brett: I think that when you talk about two things Targets well three things Strategy Targets and Action. Those last two, if you’re going to achieve the targets you want to achieve then that’s where you need to, and the action plan, doing that testing and doing that side of things is a really important part of making sure you can achieve those goals. I’m a big fan of usability testing and I read your article on ThinkVitamin. What was it?

Paul: I don’t remember. I write so many of them I get confused.

Brett: It was like cheap usability…

Paul: Oh yes I remember that.

Brett: That was like fantastic and I like tweeted it. It’s the sort of thing that I’ve definitely fit in and the actions and the targets. Because targets are about conversions and actions are about how are you going to get those conversions. I think usability is really a big part in working out those conversions. It’s like supermarkets. They have the aisles and they put the products in the right places because they want the kid to scream about the cholocate at the last minute. It’s all well thought out and on a different level it is usability. It’s arranging things in a way so the client behaves in a way, or the customer behaves the way you want them to behave. So I think it’s an essential part of the process. I didn’t fit in talking about it.

Paul: You can only fit so much in.

Brett: That’s for sure.

Paul: It was very impressive that you did it in only 10 minutes. Obviously there are real benefits to using this approach in regards to convincing clients of stuff as we’ve already said. You know you can say well we’ve gone with this colour because of these reasons etcetra. Do you think there is also a value from a sales point of view in terms of up selling yourself and giving yourself more credibility and value?

Brett: Absolutely. That was final point that I didn’t manage to get to about why you’d follow a process like this. It’s simply higher profits. What I’m saying is nothing particularly new or ground breaking. It’s really just a simple process that helps you get your head around these things. So that you’re able to more effectively how valuable what you do is and basically end up with a more effective result which sort of is a feedback. If you do something, if you sound like you do something well you do something well. Then it sort of feeds back and they’ll tell their friends and it’s sort of a marketing for yourself. So I think that having that process really is just about being able to up sell and justify. The problem that we’ve got right now and I talked about this briefly in the talk as well, is that design is becoming a comodity. People view design as a comodity. That’s a real shame. It is about up selling. It’s about selling yourself, the value you have and effectively communicating what you do. In a way that puts you in the right light so that people are willing to pay the money for it.

Marcus: It also makes you seem like more of the expert.

Brett: That’s exactly it.

Marcus: We actually tell people who say we’re not doing this obviously we feel this is the right thing for your business to take this kind of consultative approach but it benefits us as well. We tell people upfront it’s a benefit to us as well. And they’re like oh okay I see this is helping everybody.

Brett: Yeah that’s right. I think there is two things, one of the key questions we have right now that every freelancer has to ask themselves is are you worth it? Are you worth your cost? I think the two things that are worth it are strategy. Being strategic and being an expert because experts know things that you don’t. If you can get both of those things into your pitch then whatever you do you’ve already put yourself on a different platter. I think that’s where you really, and we tell this to our designers, we have a large community of resellers for GoodBarry and we tell them all the time, we have training sessions, we always talk about making sure you really lay out what they want to do, how they want to do it, and link it back to their business so that they can really put themselves at that expert level and justify the price.

Paul: I think there is also an issue here of the fact that clients like to be reassured. That when you’re buying from somebody you want to be reassured that this person knows what they are doing.

Brett: It’s about trust.

Paul: Having a methodology and an approach that you work through and has all of the different things that you just outlined. I think gives you, it gives clients that reassuring feeling that these guys know what they are doing. They’ve got an approach and they always use this approach and are comfortable with that.

Brett: I think that it’s not just about the followig the process by wrote necissarily. It’s about, or each design or freelance person or agency has their own specialties. I think at a broad level you can follow it. But there are some parts where you may dig deeaper because that’s your real expertise area. These processes are meant to be used and bent. Adapted to whatever your situation is.

Paul: So where do you think the time is to start talking about these processes? Is it once the client as signed on the dotted line? You take them through or do you encourage people to be talking about this even at the pitch stage.

Brett: I think at the pitch stage. When you’re pitching you need to demonstrate, not necissarily tell them the name of your process what your following, the methodology. But start to go through the process and say look I want to talk about your business so lets do that. Then I want to understand why your going online. Then I want to talk with you about strategies we can use, and targets that work for you. Then we’re going to talk about how we’re going to achieve this. Just by setting out that roadmap I think you’re already putting yourself miles ahead of everybody else who’s gone right to what sort of colours do you like? I think right in the pitch stage. You don’t want to go into too much detail. I think you have to strike a balance between showing them that you know this stuff really well and that you can really help them achieve these things but also leaving enough behind the fence so that there is something they’re actually going to pay for. That’s the trick is that balance. I would always fall more on the side of making friends with the client and sort of making them understand the process and how great they can be. How effective they can be. Rather than holding too much back.

Paul: I think the other benefit talking about this, I don’t know what your attitude is towards this but, it’s actually quite a good arguement agains speculative design work as well. If you’re in a position where your talking to a client and they’re asking for speculative design you can almost say well in a way this isn’t the time to do it because I haven’t understood your business. We haven’t set targets. We haven’t got a strategy here. So you can take them through the logic of why it’s too early for me to start putting designs in front of you. Is that something you’d agree with?

Brett: Totally. I’m not sure what our official company stance would be. I don’t think we’ve really talked about it. On principle I definitely agree. In our reseller training we teach stuff like that. I would have to say that I, yeah I use 99designs as an example.

Paul: Oh that’s where Ryan’s comment. I heard Ryan’s comment right at the end.

Brett: I said designers if you want to see we broke it down we had millions of designs and millions of dollars put in there and you crunch the numbers and it works out that every design that is gone and done is worth $2.80. That’s lower than minimum wage. You can go work at McDonald’s and do better than that. I think that, yeah I’m not a fan personally of speculative design. I would generally say and what we teach our resellers as part of our training is saying don’t go with that. We want to go in and understand the business. Make sure that you get your head around what they want to do because your work needs to reflect that.

Paul: I realize I haven’t asked you about GoodBarry at all. What do you guys do? I haven’t come across you before.

Brett: We have a platform for running online businesses. When you’re going online these days business owners want to be able to run their website. Email marketing is more and more important. Selling products and hooking into Paypal and things like that is harder than it needs to be. Behind all that, having a CRM database that you can track your customers and save them in a central place when they sumbit a webform or interact with your site however they interact. We’ve got a platform that does all of that.

Paul: Wow!

Brett: Our system does everything that’s in sort of that realm. It’s great for web designers because they’re able to actually create any design and put it on the system. Use all of that functionality without doing any programming. So that’s sort of what we sell. We have a reseller program. That’s why we’re here. We get designers on board to become resellers of our product. Basically they use the product they get comissions. They get a whole bunch of training from us about how to make more money and how to, pratical training. How to be a reseller. We not only take you one as a resller we want you to be able to add value to your clients. And give you some ideas about how you can do that.

Paul: Interesting business model. Well thank you so much for coming on the show. That was really useful.

Brett: That was really fun.

Paul: It’s nice to hear some other people saying the things we rant on about week in and week out.

Marcus: That’s what we rant on about all the time.

Brett: Yeah I saw your talk at FOWD in New York.

Paul: Educating Clients to Say Yes.

Brett: It really struck a chord. It’s like this is what I am talking about. I think we’re definitly on the same page.

Paul: Excellent.

Thanks goes to Curtis McHale for transcribing this interview.

Back to top

Listeners feedback: Creating a buzz

Paul: So we’re going to do something a little bit different for the listener feedback section today and it’s come about because I was chatting with Ryan Taylor via IM and he asked a particular question and I nearly turned round to him and said “Ah, you can pay for one of my consultancy clinics for an answer to that question” but then I thought that might be a bit tight of me of me, so instead I thought, lets talk about that on the show because it’s a really good issue to discuss and its a different way of doing the listener feedback and I think we’ll probably do it with some other people in the future as well. So I have Ryan on the show, hello Ryan.

Ryan: Hello Paul.

Paul: Oh I’m so honoured to meet you, your the guy that does that podcast aren’t you?

Ryan: I am, I’m the one who makes sure it doesn’t sink like a lead weight.

Paul: It’s so exciting, I feel quite in owe of this amazing super start that I have on the show.

Ryan: *laughs*

Paul: Can I have your autograph?

Ryan: Of course, you’ll have to come up here though, I’m not coming down there.

Paul: That’s a bloody long way to go isn’t it? Can’t be bothered with that.

Ryan: Aye, you have us come down there often enough.

Paul: Yes this is true.

Ryan: *laughs*

Paul: But you live up north, it’s dangerous there.

Ryan: It’s not.

Paul: There’s wild animals and thugs and things.

Ryan: It’s all rumour and hearsay.

Paul: I see it on the news all the time.

Ryan: If you weren’t such southern softies you’d be alright.

Paul: And also isn’t there loads of pollution from the factories chucking out toxic gases and stuff.

Ryan: Yeah well you see though, if the ice caps melt and we flood, your going to go first because we’re higher up than you.

Paul: That is true. Yeah but whenever I think about the north I always have this image of a post apocalyptic barren waste land anyway so it’s all swings and roundabouts.

Ryan: That’s Scotland, you’re going too far north.

Paul: *laughs*

Ryan: *laughs*

Paul: Anyway, it’s really good to have you on the show. I actually listened to last weeks show which was sold waffle but very entertaining none the less.

Ryan: Well we try our best.

Paul: *laughs* It was good, I really enjoyed it. I particularly enjoyed the horrendous swearing after the outro music.

Ryan: Oh, Anna’s just so good at all the editing she does, it was constant throughout, I really feel sorry for her.

Paul: She worked hard on that one.

Ryan: I had to ring her up an apologies personally for that one.

Paul: *laughs*

Ryan: *laughs*

Paul: Yen, we were chatting on IM and you asked a question do you want to share what you asked? Or what the issue was?

Ryan: well, erm, as you know I’ve been recording my own series of video interviews called please start from the beginning and you were the first person I interviews.

Paul: ah, it was very boring. Have you started editing them down yet? Or have other people been more concise?

Ryan: they are getting long

Paul: oh shit really.

Ryan: I think Dan Rubin holds the record at 50 minutes

Paul: flip me!

Ryan: well has also been the most interesting interview, has also received the most hits and the most traffic.

Paul: really?

Ryan: yep, everybody likes to hear Mr. Rubin waffle

Paul: I Marcus should be pretty good when you get to do him because of his whole pop-star career.

Ryan: he keeps putting me off you know…everybody I can get hold of his the hardest one to nail down. I’ve been asking him since the weekend in June and I’ve done 10 interviews now and I just can’t nail him down.

Paul: So the basic principal of the show is that you ask people about their past and ask them how they got where they got.

Ryan: Yeh, its nothing technical it’s something a little different in that I want to know what people do now, what their job title is is the first question I ask, Because I think it’s interesting to hear about what peoples different job titles are because there are so many different bearings of the same thing in the industry. So I ask that first and discuss what they do now, and then ask them to go back to the beginning as per the title of the series and take me through their career path. All the experiences they had all the lucky breaks they had, achievements and so far it’s working out really well.

Paul: Cool

Ryan: Yeh, people seem to like talking about themselves.

Paul: yeh, it’s funny that. So as we were chatting, do you want to say what your question was, what was it you were getting at, what was it you wanted from me?

Ryan: the question was how can I kind of advertise the series a bit better, how can I get more people watching it. The uptake so far has been really good, I’ve had some really good feedback and people are kind of linking to it and spreading the word a little on twitter. But for a lonely guy like me with less than 400 followers it’s hard when I tweet and you’ve only got potentially 400 people that will see it. You know the number of people coming to the site is good it’s better than I’ve ever had, but I’d like more people seeing the videos and commenting and just spreading the word. Someone like yourself with 9000 followers it’s very easy for you to spread the word about thing and I was wondering how you built your way up with Boagworld? If I do something similar, starting from the beginning.

Paul: yeh, I think this is a problem most people have they’ve got some particular website or application or service that they are offering and wanting to build up a bit of a buzz. I’m not that high up the food chain if you compare me with Mr Carson or some of the guys over in America who seem to find it very easy to create buzz and excitement about products. But I guess I’ve picked up a few things that have worked for me. I think the first one is struck me is patience, you know you haven’t been doing it that long have you?

Ryan: Well no, not too long. So far we’ve released the 8th video and it’s been steady. The kind of traffic interest has been steady level, it’s not like a huge, it not going up every week. You know we release Monday and obviously get a surge of traffic on a Monday as everyone comes to visit. That tails of towards the end of the week and then the next Monday we get another surge of traffic and I suppose there is going to be more traffic with more interest of people who are more in the public eye. Like Ryan Carson for example. There will be a spike in traffic I would have thought. But everybody just seems to like everybody which is quite interesting. So it seems to be the same every Monday, there seems to be the same amount of traffic coming to watch that video. Despite whom the person is.

Paul: well that to some degree might be down to be how much the person interview is actually pimping what you have done. You’ve got a good model in the sense you’ve got a situation where your interview well known individuals which works really well as a technique because if they do mention it and push it themselves then it’s going to drive traffic to your site and hopefully get people hooked on the other ones. Erm, but ye hi mean that’s only kind of part of the equation actually. To be honest it was a long time before I actually saw much traffic on Boagworld at all. I mean I reckon it was over a year before I got much over the 400 / 600 subscriber numbers. So it was a long long time before anything really happened, you just really need to keep plugging away and releasing regularly and often. You’re on ITunes now aren’t you?

Ryan: yes, I finally got the series on ITunes and the uptake of that has been pretty good as well, you know people jumped on that straight away and that’s slowly increasing which is nice. Yeh searchable on iTunes and please start from the beginning.

Paul: this is sounding like a massive big plug for free start from the beginning; on the other hand it is also useful stuff for other people because other people are on the same kind of position. We’ve given one tip which is produce content which has got expert whom has a big following, because they are going to talk about it which is a good thing. I mean the other thing that I think a big part of it is, is your own reputation aswel. That (erm) it’s easier for me, if I launch something new … I don’t know let me say I started a new podcast or website it will be relatively easy for me to create some buzz around that because I’ve already got 9000 followers on twitter, because I already know other people and friendly with names that will actually promote it themselves, If I ask them too. So your own reputation matters quite a lot as well and your building up quite a good network of people you know, and don’t be afraid to ask those people to pimp it a little bit. This is where your really going to see the pay off from all the conferences and meeting and chatting with people. Because you’ve become a name that people are aware of, so there’s another tip. Take the time to build up your own personal brand and reputation and attend conferences, because people will take more of an interest in you. Take this week clear left have realised font-deck, now because it’s clea

Ryan: left that’s done it they’ve had far more publicity than some other web app that has just been launched, does that kind of make sense?

Ryan: yeh, yeh, absolutely. Erm I suppose it’s a bit like anything, your reputation again takes time doesn’t it. (

Paul: yeh) I have this slight fear of ramming it down some people throats, I want people to come visit the videos and participate without really feeling harassed into doing so. (

Paul: mmmm) So I don’t want to be tweeting all the time about it and things like that. I’ve been looking at some people who retweet and nearly everybody i’ve interviewed tweeted to say there is an interview there. So if and when people see that tweet they tend to click through, it’s for people who maybe miss that tweet. It seems to be that twitter is the main thing that is driving traffic to my site for my series, and I was wondering if there was anything else I could be doing to advertise it and get people to find it naturally?

Paul: That’s the trouble isn’t it with twitter, something will get missed because you’ve just got this stream of stuff. I think there are a few things to say on that before we move on to other things you could do. Erm, I will actually tweet about something multiple times but I will subtly different ways ok. So for example I will initially (say in your case this video) then later in the day I will I maybe quote some of the comments have been made on the video. I will refer back to it a couple of days later, you know i’ve been pleased with the level of traffic or whatever. Just in order to bring it up a few times so that’s one thing that I do. The other thing is pick your times for actually tweeting about it, and that’s where something like using bit.ly like where you can track traffic is really worthwhile. Erm, because that enables you to kind of monitor the different links that your tweeting out, and notice which time of day gets the best level of traffic for you. So for example in my case I know that if I tweet around about between 5 and 8 in the evening UK I will get the most click through on whatever I do. And the reason for that is the people in UK have just finished work and are at home having their T and are checking twitter whilst they are there. They’ve got time to look at stuff, but yet in America that are following me are just waking up and are around now and their traffic is added to it in addition. So thinking about when you twitter is quite important as well.

Ryan: well that’s interesting because i’ve been releasing the episodes around about 11.30 just before lunch so people could watch over lunch if they wanted to.

Paul: yeh but that doesn’t particularly support the American audience and that is a big audience. I mean you’ve been interviewing people in America as well so I think it’s more important for you (

Ryan: mmm). The other thing you might want to do is, the people that speak that you’ve got coming on the show I presume you write to them and email them when their show goes live…or at least you should do (

Ryan: yes I do). Right include in that the embed code, in case they want to put the video on their site, because that then enable them to have some content, it’s easy and quick to put up on their site and will give you more exposure. And it’s on their blog so it’s permanent, rather than twitter which disappear in time, so that maybe a good way of doing it. (How else can I do build buzz) I mean the other part of it is building the community as well. That is at the moment you’ve just got the early days, and you’ve got visitors (

Ryan: yeh) rather than actually a community. For example I now have people that come back to my site whatever I post. So I mean you want to look at building up that community in the comments and the stuff like that. You want to give people the opportunity and making people feel involved in it. So you do that by saying “hey who should I interview?”, or “what questions should I ask them?” erm, encourage people to put comments on the video maybe ask them questions in order to encourage that commenting. That’s always a good thing you can do. And then of course in addition that as well maybe run a competition where you get people to write in and suggest themselves, why you should interview them not just interview web celebs. Interview some ordinary designers as well, people that have been in the industry from the beginning but aren’t necessarily well-known names. So anything to kind of draw the community together, because once people feel like they are involved in you know Boagworld or from the beginning, once they feel like they’ve got an ownership in then they will start to promote it themselves and that’s where word-of-mouth recommendation really comes in because people are really enthusiastic about it.

Ryan: ok that’s a good idea; I have been trying to contact and target people not necessarily big. I know the majority of people i’ve been interviewing are web celebs i’ve been trying to get all different kinds of people and different kinds of profession in the industry. So I’m trying to get a copywriter and a journalist for industry, and all the different people and their takes on the industry and how they ended up getting involved in it. To try and get as much of a diverse catalogue of people as possible. So ye hi like that idea of getting people, because as you say people don’t have to be a web celeb or a big speaker or a speaker or an a-list person to have an interesting story of what they have been doing. So yeh I like that.

Paul: The other aspect to this is looking for influencer’s o those are individuals that have a big network and a lot of influence. Going back to say twitter for example a lot of people go on about you’ve got 9000 follower or 12000 followers or whatever. But actually the number of followers is less important than erm who is following you. And if you can kind of get at and influence (no wrong word) if you can get certain key influencers to mention your product or service or website then they will reach a much bigger audiences o for example you take someone like Jeremy Keith as a good example of this. His number of followers is actually less than mine yet the people that do follow him are in turn big influencers themselves, so he’s as much of a big influencer if that makes sense?

Ryan: yeh, it’s kind of quality over quantity

Paul: yeh, exactly, totally. Erm, what else? (Mumbling) could you do? … I mean the main thing is just a time thing it has to be said, you just have to keep plugging away being regular posting, not giving up on the project because a lot of people do that you know, especially with blogs. They do it for a while and they give up because they aren’t getting the returns they want out of it. And you know maybe try writing for things like smashing magazine or sitepoint or the webdesigners depot and write about career paths that are relevant to that what it is your doing. The guys at smashing magazine are always looking for new articles because they have this beast that needs feeding on a daily basis. I know you’ve tried to write some stuff for .net mag but I have to .net mag isn’t the best place to start because they are monthly publication which means they can be a lot more picky about what they have in. Also they are very reliant on big names, while you don’t care about the name it’s about this particular product. And actually have got less of a reach (fewer subscribers) than something like smashing magazine or webdesigners depot so I would try and go to write for some of them.

Ryan: mmm that’s another interesting idea, the whole idea from this series stemmed from the fog around job titles and you know how people just kind of pick a name for themselves, like yourself web strategist (

Paul: chuckles, yeh) you know it’s so ambiguous all the time and that’s where people starting out in the industry. That’s what it started off as; people don’t know what they want to be because there is no kind of defined roles.

Paul: that’s what we spoke about on last week’s show.

Ryan: absolutely that’s really where this started and that why I started putting this series together so the series is great that it’s self promotion of myself. But it started off from an interest and it still is, and I’m enjoying doing it because it interests me knowing about other people’s career paths and that’s why I like it. I want to interview interesting people that don’t necessarily have to be hugely popular people. So ye hi like that idea about writing about them, I think that will be the natural progression when i’ve got a few more interviews and bit more raw data to work with. An article about career paths will be something in the pipeline.

Paul: I mean the back log of material really important as well (

Ryan: yeah) , because I mean i’ve got people that start from show one that are still working their way through, and obviously that increased the number of hits and visitors, because people are going back episode after episode. The other thing you’ve got to think about which is the big problem that I had which is the one of getting it transcribed so that its good from a search engine point of view as well as an accessibility point of view. But you know that’s a big old challenge doing that until you’ve got a community like I’m fortunate enough to have that are helping out and supporting it, it’s really difficult to do that.

Ryan: absolutely.

Paul: but anyway I think at that point we ought to wrap it up else this will be the longest show ever recorded, but hopefully there was some useful stuff in there for you and other people. Giving you a little hint at how the consultancy clinics work.
I think I may like to do this again so if you have a web project or you want some advice on something whatever it is then write in to [email protected] and once in a while we’ll pick one and do an interview like this. What do you think good idea Ryan?

Ryan: yeh really good idea I think people will find it useful.

Thanks goes to Andy Kinsey for transcript this listeners question.

Back to top

174. Twitterverse

On this week’s show: The entire boagworld community shares its thoughts on web design and Megan Fisher gives us practical advice on building a mobile website.

Play

Download this show

Launch our podcast player

Housekeeping

We have two pieces of housekeeping this week…

Charm Clients, Win Pitches

I am running a workshop on the 23rd of October that you maybe interested in attending if you are a freelancer or involved in selling web design services. The workshop will teach you how to sell yourself to prospective clients, how to generate sales opportunities and how to work effectively with your clients in long term partnership.

If you are interested in attending or want to find out more visit the ‘Charm Clients, Win Pitches’ web page.

As an added bonus, enter the code CWPB_09 at checkout you receive 15% off.

dContruct Competition

Good news if you are in the UK. Very unusually there are actually a few tickets left for this years dcontruct conference on the 4th September in Brighton.

Normally this conference sells out in minutes due to its amazing line up of speakers and subjects that will leave you feeling like a beginner!

However, we actually have even better news because we have two tickets to give away each worth £115+VAT. To win a ticket you have to complete the following sentence on Twitter…

My perfect web conference would include…

Tweet your answer by the 1st August for a chance of winning. The guys at Clearleft will then pick the two most inspirational/funny/entertaining answers and contact you by email.

Back to top

News

The importance of microcopy

I have learnt a new word this week – Microcopy. Microcopy is a small piece of text that reassure users and nudges them in the right direction. It is different to the instructional text criticised by Steve Krug in “Don’t Make Me Think“. This copy does not just state the obvious. Instead it clarifies and reassures.

In his post “Writing Microcopy” Joshua Porter provides a number of examples of Microcopy in action.

  • When signing up for a newsletter, say “this low-volume newsletter”
  • When people add their emails, say “we hate spam as much as you do”
  • When subscribing for something free, say “you can always unsubscribe at any time”
  • When selling an paid-for web application, be sure to let people know if you have a free trial.
  • When storing customer’s information, say “You can export your information at any time”
  • If offering optional account creation, say “If you create an account, you’ll be able to track your package”
He also cites a case where he cut credit card processing errors to near zero by adding a single sentence – “Be sure to enter the billing address associated with your credit card.”
Almost all of the examples given in the post have one thing in common – they help alleviate the concerns of users by answering the questions they already have in their heads.
As Joshua concludes: “Don’t be deceived by the size of microcopy. It can make or break an interface.”

Content templates to the rescue

In someways it seems almost pointless to discuss Microcopy when most website owners are having problems generating any quality content at all. Its not that they are doing a bad job. It is simply that they are under resourced. They are relying on ‘experts’ within their organisation to provide copy and either these people are too busy or are terrible writers.

That said, the copy is what users really care about, and one way or another we need to ensure it is as consistent and of a high quality.

One thing that might help is a List Apart article on ‘content templates’. These are not the kind of templates found within a content management system. Rather they are templates that can be given to content providers to help them write better content.

In essence a content template is a form content providers can fill in. It will suggest what kind of content they need to provide and even advice on how to write and present that content.

In the article the author gives an example of a content template for product pages. The template asks for information such as…

  • Product name
  • What is it?
  • Who is it for?
  • What does it do?
  • Why does the reader need it?
It also gives examples of how the copy might be written and advice on how to lay it out (using bullets, data tables etc.).
Its a good concept and one that is easy to adopt. Although it won’t solve your content woes it will increase the quality of copy you receive from content providers.

Being original

In 2003 Cameron Moll wrote “Good Designers Copy, Great Designers Steal” in which he explored where designers draw their inspiration. It was not the first article to tackle the subject and neither was it the last. In fact only this week the Web Designers Depot released a similar post entitled “Great Designers Steal?

What is interesting about this new post is that he defines three levels of designers…

  • The designer that copies – This is normally a designer who is starting out and who learns from visiting website galleries and lifting designs in their entirety, making only minor alternations.
  • The designer who steals – Generally more experienced, these designers find inspiration in website galleries but will not copy directly. They will be inspired by a theme or specific detail. However, these elements will be heavily customised and altered.
  • The designer who seeks originality – This designer actively avoids looking to other sites for inspiration. They turn instead to sources such as print, art, architecture and nature. Their desire is to create something entirely orginal on the web.

The idea of looking beyond the web is far from new but there is something inspiring about the post. His conclusions are particularly ponient…

The pursuit of originality on the web is not a lost cause. The web industry is still young, and some things have yet to be attempted.

Once you understand the basics of design, try to think outside the box, and try new and different things. Be atypical and unique. Experiment. Don’t be afraid to design from the heart. But keep this in mind:

“Things which are different in order to be different are seldom better, but that which is made to be better is almost always different.” —Dieter Rams

Theories and conventions are always being questioned, challenged and broken, and they should. If you believe a better way is possible, you will often find your way to it.

Tools for testing mobile websites

On this week’s show we have Megan Fisher talking about practical ways you can start building a mobile version of your site. It therefore seemed appropriate that we featured a post from Sitepoint entitled “Six Tools For Testing Designs On Mobile Devices” in our news section.

The six tools featured are…

  • Device Anywhere is a commercial operation, allowing customers to sign up and test “Any Device. Any Network. Anywhere.” There are a range of subscription plans but you can sign up for a free trial.
  • MobiReady is tests mobile-readiness using industry best practices & standards. After testing you receive a free report outlining how well your site performs.
  • Opera Mini is a live demo of the Opera Mini browser that functions like it would when installed on a handset.
  • W3C Mobile OK Checker performs a range of tests on a Web Page to determine its level of mobile-friendliness. The short report produced will tell you where you’re going wrong.
  • dotMobi Emulator emulates a real mobile phone Web browser. It’s a bit limited as you can only choose from two different phones you like as a skin.
  • iPhoney, as you could imagine, is specific to iPhone testing. It’s a downloadable application that is precise to the pixel, so useful for the designer working on iPhone apps.

With the number of internet enabled smartphones rocketing, this is an area of increasing importance and these tools will become incredibly useful. Check out the post for more details.

Back to top

Interview: Megan Fisher on starting building a mobile website

Stanton:Alright so we’re here with Megan Fisher, Hello Megan.

Megan:Hi Guys!

Stanton:Hiya, how are you?

Megan:I’m well thanks.

Stanton:Good, we’ve just seen you onstage talking about designing for mobile.

Megan:That’s right.

Stanton:Designing effective mobile interfaces.

Ryan:Paul checks his badge as we speak, just to double check, you are Megan Fisher aren’t you?

Megan:Yes I am.

Stanton:So I really enjoyed your talk.

Megan:Thank you.

Stanton:So we’re just really asking you about it for all the Boagworld listeners

Ryan:I suppose first of all do you want to tell use who you are, where you’re from so the people who don’t know who you are have a bit of an understanding.

Megan:Sure, I’m Megan Fisher I work for SimpleBits with Dan Cederholm and we’re based in Boston, Massachusetts, small little web design shop.

Stanton:Do you want to give us the overview of what you talked about today.

Megan:Sure, so basically where I’m coming from is I’m a designer for desktop browsers first, and that’s what I’ve being doing for the passed several years, and kind of ignoring mobile web because it seems intermediating and there are so many devices out there with all different resolutions and different CSS support so, it seemed rather scary, but recently Dan’s been working on this new application he’s launching and I decided to take on the challenge of doing a mobile web site for it, so my talk was kind of covering how you get started when you’re first approaching mobile web design.

Stanton:Ok and you gave us three distinct levels of mobile support you can role in, the easy with little work and the benefits with that, and then progressively the more work you put in then the better experience.

Megan:Right, and I think that’s the key with starting with mobile web design, is that you can do it in small steps, it can be iterative, the first step can be showing your markup and that’s obviously the easier step, and then slowly adding a little style so it kind of enhances the site for mobile users and eventually it would be great if we could all design our own mobile specific sites.

Stanton:So in your kind of day to day client work, is this something that you try and roll in to the client saying we can build you this mobile interface, I can tell it’s probably one of the things that’s often gets cut from the budget if you say we can built this fantastic mobile interface for you, or we can give you just the basic level of support.

Megan:Yes, that’s funny. I haven’t had a lot of clients actually requesting mobile sites, and normally I’ll just kind of, you want to make sure your markup is well written and I’ll do a quick little mobile style sheet, sort of when you do your print style sheet that’s like a standard step, and I actually haven’t really offered to do a full on mobile interface yet, that’s kind of a big task and working on dribble is the first step, when you work on your own project you can do these things and not worry about budget and just have fun with it.

Ryan:You talked about three steps in your talk, do you want to take us though those and give us an overview of each.

Megan:Let’s see if I can remember them without the slides

Ryan:I can remind you, I’ve made notes.

Megan:No no no, so the first step is you just want to make sure your markup is always standards based and semantically correct, hopefully most of your viewers, or listeners are already doing this, the benefits of using web standards are well known, they’re faster to load and accessible for a lot of people. So the first step is writing clean and accessible markup, there’s a lot of benefits to doing this as we well know, but for mobile devices specifically they’re going to load a lot faster and if you’re not using tables for layout and you’re using correct semantics in terms of headline tags, and unordered lists and strong tags for emphasis then you’re going to have a much better shot at getting your site to render correctly on a mobile browser.

Stanton:You also talked about mobilising the layout and reordering the content based on the device, and the context in which the site will be used.

Megan: Right, so the first step you can do is making sure your sites one column, and disabling floats is an easy way to do that, and then you want to, display: none is your friend, you want to hide content that’s not going to be useful for mobile users, especially things like flash and all that sort of added stuff, and making sure the most important content comes first and it’s easy to navigate and you can get a clear picture of what the site does, disabling images is another good step because that improves load times of course.

Stanton:And finally it was staying with your brand.

Megan:Right, so a lot of people thing maybe, or maybe people assume because you’re designing for such a small screen space and you want to keep your load times fast that this means you can’t have all your cool branding stuff that would have on your regular web site for your desktop browser, but that’s necessary true you can still incorporate background images and if you use small compressed graphics that are relevant to your branding that would still work, keeping the colour scheme consistent with what you have on your normal web site and the typography you can kind of play with that, and there’s fairly good support for that.

Stanton:You got this asked in the Q&A at the end but I’m going to hijack it and ask you again for the benefit of our listeners, with the adoption of devices like the iPhone and the BlackBerry and consistent UI’s with WebKit and Safari coming into the mobile browser and being able to use jQuery and all that jazz, can you see it getting easier to develop these things and how would you go about testing for different devices.

Megan:Sure, so it’s kind of a two parter, when you’re considering things like the iPhone there’s still a lot of advantages to creating a separate mobile site for these devices, and really the biggest thing you want to think about is the resolution, in the old days of web design we had to design sites that were for 800 by 600 resolution, obviously that was something you considered in the design process, so just because the iPhone renders using WebKit and it looks like it would in Safari, it doesn’t mean you don’t want to design for that screen size, as far as testing for different devices, most of the major devices out there have a rendering engine that you can look at, there’s lots of great tools, one that I used mobify.me and they have support for something like 4,000 devices and they’ll let you test on those and also they have a script you can use that will automatically direct those browsers to your mobile site.

Ryan:How consistent are they between devices, are some devices majorly inconsistent in the way they render sites or are they quite, are we nearly there?

Megan:It’s definitely gotten better especially with things such as zooming, there’s a lot more support for different styles, it’s difficult to say because it really varies in places like Africa they’re using older devices maybe with smaller screens and obviously the iPhone is hugely popular in the States so, that’s what I use to test, it’s difficult with consistency and there’s been a lot written about it, I mentioned in the talk the article on A List Apart about the return of the mobile style sheet is what the article is called, and he kind of goes over that and the consistency and support for handheld CSS.

Stanton:Are there any books or articles that you would recommend people that are wanting to know more about this to check out?

Megan:Yea absolutely, so like I said if you go on A List Apart and just search mobile, obviously A List Apart is a great resource for designers and they have excellent articles on the mobile web as well, Cameron Moll has written a fantastic book called mobile web design and it’s available as a PDF download it’s fairly inexpensive, and that’s what I used when I first started doing my research, also if you go on Delicious and search the tag FOWD09 research you can see all the resources I used for putting my talk together.

StantonOk, well thank you very much.

Megan:No problem guys.

Thanks to Ben Everard for taking the time to transcribe this show.

Back to top

Listeners section: Web design advice from Twitter

This weeks listener section is going to be a little different to normal. Instead of answering a listeners question, I decided to ask my Twitter followers to help me write a blog post. I posted the following Tweet…

I am writing a post on web design words of wisdom - think 'confusus says'. Post yours to Twitter in 140 characters or less. #webwisdom

The answers I received formed the basis of my latest blog post ‘Web Design Wisdom from Twitter‘.

167. Beyond Technology

On this week’s show: Paul shares his inspiration on blog writing and we talk to Mike Kus about our obsession with technology.

Play

Download this show.

Launch our podcast player

News

Good vs Great Design

Cameron Moll is one of the most intelligent and inspirational designers I know. Where some design on an instinctive level finding it hard to describe what makes their designs work, Cameron has carefully deconstructed his work and seems to have a firm grasp of what makes it tick. He understands design. He understands the processes behind design and the rules that make it as much a science as an art.

This deep understanding of design shines through in a free PDF download (Good vs. Great Design) available from his website. The PDF has been produced to accompany his talk at the HOW design conference in Austin Texas and is packed with little insights into good design practice.

The document is only 10 pages long and yet touches on subjects as diverse and grandiose as…

  • The nature of great design
  • The differences between influence and inspiration
  • The need to understand a problem before searching for a solution
  • The power of typography
  • Definitions of visual hierarchy
  • The need for a ‘creative pause’
Obviously, there is only so much Cameron can cover in 10 pages. However, the document is a great starting point for further reading on the subject. Cameron recommends 4 books in particular…
  • How Designers Think (Bryan Lawson) – A book devoted to the idea that design thinking is a skill, and as such it is something that can be improved.
  • The Elements of Typographic Style (Robert Bringhurst) – A complete study in typography, from the broadest concepts to the smallest details.
  • Universal Principles of Design (William Lidwell, Kritina Holden, Jill Butler) – A reference of vocabulary and examples from the disciplines of graphic design and user interface design.
  • The Design of Everyday Things (Donald A. Norman) – An extensive investigation of the interplay between design and living.

If you are looking to deepen your understanding of design, then this is a great place to start.

Eye tracking findings

I have mixed feelings about eye tracking exercises. This is probably partly because I am not particularly knowledgeable on the subject. Although, I am happy to acknowledge that they offer a valuable insight into users behavior and are a useful tool in our usability arsenal, I do have two concerns…

  • Running an eye tracking session is expensive. If this leads to a reduction in the number of rounds of traditional user testing or the number of users tested, then I would have serious concerns.
  • Although eye tracking provides an insight into where a user is looking, it does not reveal anything about intent or comprehension. For example, if a user only briefly glances at a key screen element this doesn’t necessarily mean they are ignoring it. It could mean that it is well designed and the user quickly processed the information it was attempting to convey.

Ultimately, I would be concerned to see too much weight put on their results. That said, it is interesting to see the results of eye tracking and Eyetrack have released some results from one such exercise that focused on the homepages of news site. Useful nuggets included…

  • Dominant headlines most often draw the eye first upon entering the page.
  • Smaller type encourages focused viewing behavior.
  • Navigation placed at the top of a homepage performed best.
  • Shorter paragraphs performed better.
  • We also learned that the bigger the image, the more time people took to look at it.
  • Our research also shows that clean, clear faces in images attract more eye fixations on homepages.

It’s a good read and although most of the points are common sense, it is nice to have evidence to backup those opinions.

Online reputation management

“Online reputation management” – Sounds ghastly doesn’t it? Sounds like the horrible love child of social media and marketing BS. That said, for better or worse, it is becoming increasingly important to manage how we are perceived online.

As I recently said in an interview at FOWD, our websites are no longer the only place where our brand is discussed. As a result we need to engage with users wherever they are talking about us. The question is, how do we do that successfully?

Whether we are responsible for our organizations brand or just want to know what is being said about us personally, there are various techniques and tools that can help.

This week Sitepoint have brought those tools and techniques together in 3 useful and informative posts…

Past disasters like Dell Hell are perfect examples of just how important this area is. It is time we all started to think carefully about how we are perceived.

7 Quick CSS Enhancements for Better User Experience

I haven’t seen much written about CSS over the last year or so. It has been as if everything that can be said about CSS, has been said. However, just recently we are beginning to see a few CSS focused blog posts appearing. One example is 7 Quick CSS Enhancements for Better User Experience by David Walsh.

What I love about this post is the ideas suggested can be applied on top of an existing site design. They are just little ‘touches’ that make the site visually more appealing and easier to use. The 7 suggestions are…

  • Change the text colour of selected links
  • Prevent Firefox scroll bars from jumping
  • Give form fields rounded corner
  • Control where page break occurs when printing
  • Show icons that identify the file type of link destinations
  • Change the cursor when it hovers over a submit button or label so it actually looks clickable
  • Increase the clickable area of a link  using display:block

Each suggestion comes with an explanation of its benefits and the code required to implement.

Admittedly not all browsers will understand these enhancements. However, because they are not crucial to the functionality that really does not matter. Its a nice example of graded browser support.

Back to top

Interview: Mike Kus on our obsession with technology

Paul: Okay, so joining me today is Mike Kus from Carsonified – good to have you on the show.

Mike: Good to be here.

Paul: It’s really nice. So, as the listeners will have gathered by now, we’re doing a whole series of little interviews off the back of ‘The Future of Web Design’ conference, where we can do all our interviews in one go, rather than spreading them out over time.

Marcus: Yay, we like this.

Paul: So Mike has just finished his presentation and there’s some excellent stuff in there, but you were quite kind of, what’s the word… You were quite harsh to the poor web design community and their obsession with details of technological stuff.

Mike: Yeah, maybe yeah.

Paul: You know, all of this “does it really matter whether your code validates”, not that you used that as an example, but I can’t remember what examples you did use, you did have a few didn’t you.

Mike: No, well I mean things like [a lot of debate to un-debate] which I come across and you see lots of times. You know, it’s a question that’s probably never going to get answered. I just come across it all the time still, and it’s like make up your own mind and move on.

Paul: I got the impression that you feel that perhaps as a community we’re a little bit petit, and overly concerned with minutia.

Mike: No, I mean, I love the web community *laughter*, no I do I love it and I love being part of it; it’s great. The funny thing is I started off two years ago doing web stuff, and I really do feel now two years on, that web design… I don’t see many differences to me between web and print now. It’s all the same thing to me, you’re just designing, you know. And I guess because I feel design is so important, I sort of maybe feel a bit left out *laughter* in conversations, because people don’t seem to talk about the design as much. And the reason that talk was called “Forgotten Web Standards”, I mean I know some guy heckled at the end saying about it not really…

Paul: “It’s not really a web standard.”

Mike: No, and I know that. It’s just a cool title I thought – it gets people thinking, and really the part that related to web standards was just because I feel like for a site, good layout and thinking about things from a graphic design point of view contributes to accessibility on a web site.

Paul: Yeah. And also to be honest, I mean what is web standards other than a set of guidelines and criteria. Equally there’s sets of guidelines and criteria about good design; use of colour, you know.

Mike: Well that’s it, yeah. To be honest it was really more just a good title, and I didn’t expect people to start analysing.

Paul: But they will!

Mike: Yeah I know, yeah; I should have known.

Paul: But I think you raised an interesting point, or a good point which is that we can get so hung up in the logistics of how web sites are built that we’re not always giving the attention to the design aspects of it. And even more specific than that, it’s the whole discussion about, you know, we spend a lot of time talking about usability and accessibility, but aesthetics do matter. We almost have this attitude in some ways that aesthetics are just skinning it afterwards.

Mike: Yeah, yeah I know, I agree. I think aesthetics do, well to me they matter. You know my opinion is just my opinion and other people have different opinions, and on a day like today you’re going to get people talking about the code side of things, and I just feel that I know what I know best, and it’s what I can bring to it, it’s what I can bring to the table, and people can take away from it what they like. Someone’s got to do it haven’t they.

Paul: It’s quite interesting, in your mind you don’t make a differentiation between the print stuff you do and the online stuff you do. Surely there are differences Mike.

Mike: Of course there are differences, yeah. But the processes I go through as a designer are the same.

Paul: Right.

Mike: I’ve noticed that much more; I guess of course there are differences. I mean for a start you’ve got to think about things differently in web design because you’ve got to make sure that people understand where you’ve got to go to click things; how you’re going to navigate your way through the site. But once you sort of know that, it’s sort of… Once you’ve built a load of sites and you know that, that’s just something that comes naturally to think about.That’s a different part, that part where you just get used to doing it, then ,he essence of the process is the same. Designing something for a web site, I find there are the same pitfalls and hurdles designing for print as for web. And the funny thing is, and I really feel now as well, that the coding side… I’m not the best coder in the world, and probably not the worst, but I’ve learnt loads in this past year, and I’m writing much cleaner code now than I was a year ago. I enjoy that too, and I know it’s important.

Paul: Yeah. But like you say there are lots of people discussing that, and not as many discussing the design side of things.

Mike: Yeah, and I totally read up on stuff about code; I know it’s important. I guess for me, sometimes I’d want to go in line and get involved in discussions about design, and I know you get Photoshop tips and tutorials don’t you, but that’s not really design.

Paul: Yeah. But a lot of that’s about using the tools of design rather than the principles of design.

Mike: Exactly, it’s all tools yeah. I’m interested in the principles and the ideas and imagination part, you know.

Paul: You talked in your presentation about design aiding the experience, you know; experience based design. I was just interested to hear you talk a little more around that, about how you feel that design can… In what ways can design affect the experience that a user has and what do you mean by the ‘the experience of a user’?

Mike: Well I guess I mean when I go to a web site, and for a start, at least if we’re just talking from an aesthetic point of view, if I return to, and again this is something that appeals to me, if I go to a web site and it gob smacks because it looks so beautiful, that in one foul swoop is my experience of it, you know? But I think there are other things more technical, and when I say technical I don’t mean in a code way, but in a technical graphic design way, you can enhance people’s experience just by… I like the idea of merging more, like you said, things I learnt at college about graphic design and where to make people look in a page, and how to highlight. Combining the technical bits of graphic design, what to highlight and what to push back, how to take people’s eyes in to the bits you want them to read, and then the slightly less important stuff, pushed back a bit, and combining that with an aesthetic. So if you’ve got a great aesthetic and you’ve really thought about where people are looking on your page, and how they’re going to follow through you’re site, to me those things combined is what I mean by designing for experience; a good experience. Because you could obviously design for a bad experience!

Paul: Well obviously, yeah, that’s easier! Another thing that interests me about your work in particular, and really people need to go and look at examples of stuff that you’ve done to grasp this, but you have a very distinct and obvious style; I think you do anyway. So I can look at the stuff you’ve done for Carsonified, and then even the stuff you’ve done here for Microsoft and there’s obviously a consistent theme to that. Do you think that having a very strong style creates problems sometimes when you’re trying to reach different audiences, and you’ve got to battle with your own style, do you find that a problem?

Mike: Well, this is something I find really interesting because growing up as a graphic designer and stuff, I was always someone who basically… For a start if you’re working for clients and you’re an agency, and you’re getting different jobs, you’ve obviously got to be able to create something completely different one day to the next, potentially. And the funny thing is I actually carried that through into my personal work, and I was like “I can’t do something like this because I’ve done something that looks a bit like that before.” But then you know how you can get famous illustrators who basically churn out the same stuff all the time and they get seriously famous, and one company gets them to do something, and another company…

Paul: They come to that person because of that style.

Mike: Exactly, and I think the only reason my stuff you’re seeing… if you looked at the Orchestrate site, that’s me turning my hand to something through a brief.

Paul: Yeah that’s true actually, yeah, because that has got a very different style.

Mike: I’m just answering the brief there, you know, so it is something I can do.

Paul: Sorry, I didn’t mean to imply you couldn’t, it’s a constant discussion isn’t it.

Mike: I don’t think you implied that *laughter* But it’s interesting, and the only reason I do bring my style into the projects you see that overlap each other is because I’ve had the freedom to do so.

Paul: Yeah, and I guess to some degree, the style that I’m exposed to is the style that’s aimed at people like me.

Mike: Yeah.

Paul: So the fact that you did the Microsoft stand here at ‘The Future of Web Design’, well actually it’s good that it’s got the same style as the other stuff that’s going on because it’s a style aimed at web designers and people like me.

Mike: Yeah, and another thing about doing stuff that’s similar, is you do get to get known for a certain thing, which in some ways I think “is that good or bad?” I don’t know, but I think I’m keen to make sure people know I can do different stuff. But at the same time I’m happy to be known for a certain style, because I think it’s sort of like an identity you get. And so I’d like to keep a balance there, but I definitely don’t mind being known for something that’s got a feel about it.

Paul: Yeah. I mean equally after saying that, which kind of brings me on to the next topic I want to talk about, is that the style that I typically associate you with is quite illustrative, you know, you’ve got this certain way of doing things. And then your set of slides for this week weren’t at all like that, they were very typographic, and you did talk a little bit about typography. We interviewed Mark Bolton on the subject of typography as well. I’m interested in your take on typography because you seem to use letter forms almost as design tools rather than necessarily as standard typography if that makes sense.

Mike: Yeah, well that’s interesting because when I did those slides, the reason they look like that is because I basically took a theme and I got interested with that, what’s his name… I can’t remember, a Swiss graphic designer, very famous I can’t remember his name now, it’s escaped from me, but it’s sort of Swiss modern graphic design, and I was looking at Swiss modern graphic design and some Russian constructivism stuff on Flickr, you know. And because when I was at college, that sort of graphic design, I was brought up on that; it was the first thing I was interested in, and because it was a graphic design themed talk, I used that as the style. And it just so happened that throughout it, the experiment with type and shapes and stuff was something that just happened in making those slides, and I suddenly realised I was getting something out of using type in a graphical way, it’s not just about the words, I mean a slide I like – my own stuff I love! *laughter* – that one that says (and I loved doing that slide and I think it looked great) was the one that said “buck trends and break conventions”, and conventions was all mashed up in different ways. There’s something beautiful about type though isn’t there, like huge letters, and I wish I could have seen those slides, because that screen was so big.

Paul: It looked spectacular, yeah.

Mike: There was a huge, massive letter N, you know. I guess now it excites me, type; I think it can be the basis for great design, not just in a traditional typography way, but actually great graphic design. I guess I think the whole type debate as in “where are we going to get all the fonts from”, or “what’s going to be the standard way of using them” – for some reason I don’t feel restricted by the web font thing.

Paul: No, it’s interesting. Mark was saying exactly the same thing as well.

Mike: It’s not something that bothers me, and I’m quite happy.

Paul: I mean a lot of the ways, certainly the ways you used them in the slides, we’re talking about using type as a graphic element in those cases, rather than necessarily to convey large amounts of copy; it’s a subtlety different thing going on there.

Mike: Yeah, yeah.

Paul: I was also quite interested when you talked in your presentation about a logo design that you did, and about how you were being stopped at every turn by the client effectively because they were saying “no, no, we don’t want to be associated with that etc.” So you then added in a strap line into that which you then built the logo around the strap line rather than the brand itself. Now, that was quite interesting because that gets into the realms of relationship between copy and design, and how the two things work together. And in that case, you came up with the strap line did you?

Mike: Yeah, I’m quite into… I mean, I don’t want to say it myself, but Ryan for example seems to think I’m quite good at copy – which is nice of him to say. It’s a way I work quite a lot, I’ve done loads and loads of logo / branding stuff in the past, and I did something, for example, for the Body Shop once. Basically I could do anything, and it was about raising money for a school in Kosovo to get it built, and they just wanted a poster. I just thought of a strap line anyway, because I could do anything I wanted. It was “building a future”, and that was all it was, and it had all these huge letters. Well it had “building a future” and the letters were all piled up and leaning against each other. I guess often the first thing I think of is copy whenever I’m designing something, especially if I’ve got a new site to design, I’m like well what are the words, what’s going on, what’s it about, is there a strap line, do you need one – you know – what’s written in the first paragraphs in the home page, is there something in there I can use to spark the idea for the design. I think copy in that respect has got a massive relationship to design. It’s rubbish trying to work with Latin text.

Paul: Yeah I know, lipsum, yeah.

Mike: It’s alright for that filling in a paragraph or something, but it’s nice to have that proper copy to hook your design on to it; it can be really helpful.

Paul: The thing that you intrigued me with is that you were going through things like layout, colour, typography, then you hit imagery, and you said there’s a whole presentation there. I want to know what the presentation is, I want to know what is it that you know, obviously there’s a lot of depth there that you couldn’t cover, and I’m just interested in that.

Mike: I think what it was, you’ve talked about my illustrative stuff already, so say you use that for the sake of argument right now because you could apply this to photography as well, I guess to me a site doesn’t have to be like you put it together; I don’t know, I’m going to put a picture here or an illustration there… It can evolve round an illustration from the very beginning. I know it’s a pretty one off site, but the Twiggy site for example, which is just a bit of fun, really quick, but that was just literally me, do what the hell I want, just have fun, and it wasn’t the most practical site design maybe, but you know that just literally was an image that built up and changed, and it was the basis for that site design. It wasn’t just in the site it was the site, and it had the huge letters in the background. I only had a short slot, and if I had more time I would have gone into why I felt it can be the basis for your site, not just something you add to it. Your site can grow from your photographs and illustrations rather than putting them into your site.

Paul: That’s a nice way of thinking about it, yeah. Because I do tend to start with the grid structure and the layout, and all that kind of thing, and then slot imagery in which I can see what you’re saying, you can miss a trick there if you’re not careful.

Mike: Yeah it’s funny I’m changing the way I work lately, and I was talking to Keir about this. I’m starting to think about stuff like you remember when Andy Clarke said he works from the inside out, and I’m starting to do that design wise.

Paul: Right, okay. You mean start with the detail or something?

Mike: Well start with something on the middle of the page. I just open a Photoshop document to start, and I know at one point in the page I’ll have like this… For example, I’m working on something at the moment, it’s got the planet Earth, and all I’ve got on the page is the Earth, I’ve got some bits coming off of it, and then I’m going to add this descriptive paragraph, and I haven’t got anything else on the page at this point, I’m just building it out.

Paul: Wow, that’s quite interesting.

Mike: Rather than thinking “ohhh”, and worrying about things like navigation afterwards, because it’s so easy to just go “no, nav-i-gat-ion”, and then I think no wait a minute what have I done, it’s literally just this autopilot.

Paul: Yeah, and to be honest that’s almost why, in the end, I moved on from design in my career, because I felt I was beginning to do exactly that, go on autopilot. So there is this need to find ways to refresh the way you’re working and stuff like that.

Mike: The funny thing is, it’s natural progression as well. It’s not a choice I’ve made, I just found myself doing this.

Paul: That’s good, that’s really good. You talk a lot about “I had a lot of freedom on this project; I could do what I wanted.” You said that several times in this interview. Do you like that, or do you like having constraints? Because a lot of people that are listening to this are going, “well it’s all well and good for him because he’s working on internal projects and he doesn’t have clients”, and that kind of thing, although you are doing client work now. So there we go, there’s a nice comparison between the client work you’re doing and the internal stuff. Where does your heart lie?

Mike: Yeah, I don’t know actually. Sometimes I hate having no restrictions. Sometimes, no restrictions is the worst thing in the whole world, I hate it. Sometimes it can be terrible, sometimes it’s great. Because if you’ve got no restrictions at all sometimes it’s so hard; that Microsoft thing, I was like “what the hell am I going to do, I haven’t got a clue”. For a start, I’ve never designed a stand before, let alone just an idea. I spent three days getting to that, just getting to the beginning of that idea. I literally produced nothing for three days. The fourth day I was like, “I think I’ve got something”, and that was hard because it had no restrictions because the whole point they came to us was because they wanted to do something different. So the pressure was on to think of something really different, and it’s hard when you can start anywhere. Sometimes it’s really nice to have restrictions, like that Orchestrate site was nice; I got back after Christmas, and John Hicks has put together roughly what had to look like.

Paul: Right. You had to carry on with his style.

Mike: Yeah sort of. I mean it did progress from that, but it had a logo and a colour scheme and a nice, tidy, neat… you know I just had to follow it through and it was nice, I enjoyed doing it. It was a nice break from “you can do anything”, which is actually harder I think.

Paul: Right, that’s interesting.

Mike: Much harder actually. I used to do music quite a lot, and in a way what was always helpful was restricting our instruments completely, and not having much to work with. Because it sort of sets you on a path at least, where as when you’re starting out and you can go any which way you want…

Paul: Yeah, it’s too open.

Marcus: It’s the starting part that’s the hard bit; it’s that initial creative spark. If somebody said “this is my idea, I want you to build me something,” then it’s like great I can do that. But, what’s better about when you’ve got, because I do a quite a lot of music as well (or did), it’s when you get something going and it’s good, that’s more satisfying than working on someone else’s work, but if it’s one of those days when it’s just not coming then, you know…

Paul: Which brings us on to what I wanted to wrap up with, which was you mentioned this slide about bucking trends and breaking trends and that kind of thing, and you advised against CSS galleries, you advised against Smashing Magazine’s trends for the last year, which people turn to for inspiration because they struggle to know where to begin. So if you’re advising against those things, which by the way I think is an excellent piece of advice, we asked Jim Coodle this as well, where does your inspiration come from? Where do you turn to if you don’t turn to that kind of thing?

Mike: I guess I do advise that, but I don’t like to sound like I’m telling people what to do *laughter*

Paul: Well if you stand on a stage…

Mike: I guess, yeah. But the funny thing is, I’ll be in a book shop… A year ago, for example, I was in a book shop and I picked up Jamie Oliver’s book, it was made of a nice sacky cover, don’t know if you’ve seen it, it’s got white and blue in it, it was beautiful. The graphic design and the layout was lovely, and I was like “oh I’ll buy that”, not for cooking, just because it looked nice, and I was like “I’m going to design a web site like that”. And someone on Twitter just said something about how they’d just discussed Mike Kus’s talk over lunch and how much of an idiot I am, and something about imagine your web site in print, which is what I said at the end.

Paul: Which I thought was brilliant, but he had problems with that did he?

Mike: Yeah, well he said it’s absolutely useless, different mediums, why would you do that.

Paul: It’s to take it out of context, and give yourself a chance to look at it from a completely different angle. It would be the same as projecting it huge on a wall or sketching it out in chalk, or whatever.

Mike: Well that’s it, exactly. It’s like what you said a minute ago about it’s so easy to go into autopilot with these things, and I think sometimes you need something to jolt your brain into looking at it a little bit differently. Because to me there are a lot of things on the web… Just imagine if you get a web site like your average one – it’s got the gradients all over it and everything, you put it on a magazine page; it would look weird. You have to ask yourself, why are you doing that. I know it’s a different medium, and I think we can all be clever enough to realise that, and there’s obviously bits I’m not going to say it’s got to be like a magazine, but I think it’s worth asking yourself those questions.

Paul: In the same way as in the talk, which I thought was really nice, was you had these amazing set of slides that had a very distinct look, and that was being projected massive on a wall, and yet you transposed that into a poster you gave away to people. So you were crossing those mediums and using inspiration from both which I thought was excellent; it was good. It went well didn’t it?

Mike: It was good, yeah I was pleased.

Paul: Excellent. Well thank you so much for your time Mike, that was really useful, and I think it will be very helpful for people. Especially freelancers that are stuck by themselves, and stuck in their own routine of working. It’s nice to hear how other people work, so thanks.

Mike: Cool. Cheers, thanks a lot.

Thanks goes to Gareth James for transcribing this interview.

Back to top

Listeners feedback:

APIs, source control and Ryan Carson

On show 164 Ryan Carson shared some more advice on running and building web applications as part of his ongoing series for Boagworld. Although Ryan’s advice is excellent, Boagworld listener Glen Bennett wanted to offer an alternative perspective over a couple of Ryan’s suggestions.

Hi Paul and Marcus, this is Glen Bennett from small business hosting. I was excited when you had Ryan Carson on the show talking about web application building, finally someone on the show who knew what they were talking about, however he cave out some information that was a bit misleading and I wanted to clear it up for your listeners, first of all he talked about spreedly.com and indicated that their fee is an alternative to the standard processing fees, in actuality it’s a fee that’s in addition to all the standard processing fees, there service sits in front of the processing gateway and therefore it’s an additional fee and there fee is not insignificant, in addition to that you would have to build an interface to their product. So there is some building cost at your end. I agree that building a processing engine is pretty substantial and something that you want to get help with if you possibly can there are packages out there anywhere from a few hundred dollars to a few thousand dollars that are actually pre-written source code that you put into you payment package, you have to do that pretty early in the process so that you can make sure that your user registration matches up with the processing system.

The second thing he talked about which is a source code repository, which is GIT hub, fantastic product and I recommend it highly, I think all developers should go and look at it, however the free service is primarily for a public repository so I don’t think he would have wanted to put DropSend source code into a public repository so their free service is not something that you’d probably want to use for your web application unless it’s an open source web application and there is a small fee for GIT hub but a lot of hosting packages come with SVN included for free so you might want to look into that, you can use GIT locally on your local system and then SVN them up to your free repository on the internet so you have a remote repository that’s free during development time. So there’s a couple of tips, a couple of corrections for web developers, I hope that helps and I want to thank Ryan Carson for the additional information that he had in his tips, I found it all very useful. Thank you very much.

Blog writing inspiration

Recently we received an email from Jon. He wrote:

I was wondering how do you find inspiration for your articles? How do you expand upon your initial idea and is there a process you go through when writing an article? How long do you spend writing an article? And lastly what do you think is the hallmark of a good article?

These are all good questions. The majority of blogs  have long since been abandoned by their authors. The owner either struggle to think of new content or finds running a blog more time consuming than anticipated.

I don’t claim to have all the answer when it comes to successful blogging. However I can share with you a few principles I work by…

  • Limit your time – I work best when I have a deadline. If I have too much time I over think things and pick at the details. This makes blogging  high maintenance and hard to keep up. Unless the content of a blog post is going to be used elsewhere (see Recycle below) I will never spend more than a couple of hours writing something. To me a blog is about sharing ideas, not writing a perfect piece of copy. I know I am not the best writer in the world and so make up for this by sharing ideas on a regular basis. In order to do that, I limit the time available for each post.
  • Keep an ideas list - Ideas for blog posts occur to me all the time and I have trained myself to constantly ask ‘would what I am doing make a good blog post?’ However, you can guarantee my mind will go blank the moment I sit down to write one. That is why it is important for me to keep a list of ideas. Whether you add them to a notebook or keep a list in WordPress, you need to make it as quick and easy to add ideas as possible. Also, when I add an idea, I try to flesh it out a little. Instead of just adding a title I also include a rough synopsis of what I want to cover.
  • Create an outline – Before I begin writing, I always create an outline of what I want to cover. I usually do this using Omni Outliner where I jot down random thoughts on the subject. I then sort those ideas into a logical structure. Once the structure is in place, writing the final post is much easier. This is because I know where I am going. It also ensures I lead the reader through a story, rather than throwing random thoughts at them.
  • Write first, edit later – Its easy to get caught up in spelling, grammar and structure to the detriment of flow. I tend to write posts in one go. I don’t re-read what I have written until the whole thing is finished. Stopping to check what I have written breaks my focus and leads to disjointed articles that take longer to write. Better to write the whole thing and then re-read the post afterward editing it then.
  • Write for your audience – Before I begin a blog post I always ask myself whether this will be of interest to my audience. Sometimes I indulge myself with personal posts, but most of the time I work hard to stay on topic and only write content that is focused on meeting my readers needs. This applies not just to the subjects chosen. It also to the style of writing and terminology used. For example, I try to avoid too much technical jargon because it may not be accessible to website owners. However, I don’t always succeed!
  • Write for scanability – There is a vocal minority in the blogging community who frown upon image heavy, list based, blog posts. However, I think there is a lot to be learnt from them. People who subscribe to my blog read a lot of other blogs too. With so much information to keep abreast of they rarely have time to read everything I write. I therefore write in a way that lets them get the ‘gist’ of a post without reading every word. Lists are one way to do this, as is the use of imagery. However, I also use headings and front loading too. Wherever possible make content easy to skim read. If you do not, users are likely to skip it entirely.
  • Ask for suggestions - I have found the best way to come up with ideas for my blog is to ask my readers. I actively encourage people to email me with questions, reviews or comments and these inspire ideas for posts. In fact the very question I am answering here would make a great blog post. Hmmm… perhaps I should stop before I waste the opportunity :-)
  • Ask your readers opinion – As well as asking for suggestions also ask for feedback. A good blog post does not have to be you sharing your words of wisdom with the world. It can also be asking a question and encouraging feedback. Some of the best content on blogs  can be found in the comments, rather than the actual posts. Try to write posts that encourage a dialogue rather than a monologue. Also if you do manage to spark a passionate discussion, followup with a second post that summarizes the views expressed.
  • Recycle – Finally, I am a great believer in recycling ideas. For example the answer to this question will appear on my blog, on the podcast and also will make a great Audioboo tip. Many of my best blog posts have either come out of a presentation I gave or a chapter from my book.

This is not a definitive set of guidelines and every blogger will work differently. However, this approach has helped me to continue blogging for over 4 years. I will leave it to you to judge whether the quality has remained high ;-)

Finally, if you are a regular blogger I would love to hear your thoughts on keeping your blog fresh. How do you come up with ideas and ensure the quality of your posts? Let us know by adding a comment below.

Back to top

10 ways to put your content in front of more people

What is more important – driving traffic to your site or encouraging as many people as possible to see your content? Believe it or not, they are not one in the same thing.

Too often as website owners we live and die by Google Analytics. We fret about bounce rates, unique visitors and dwell time. However, when we focus so heavily on the performance of our website we miss a fundamental point – the aim is to expose users to our content not our site. The website is tool a that can be used to showcase our content, but it does not have to be the only one.

Truly successful websites understand this principle. Take for example the following…

  • Amazon – Their primary objective is to sell stuff.
  • YouTube – Their aim is to use video content to carry advertisements
  • Twitter – They are about facilitating twittering (who knows what their business model is!)

In each case it is the content that matters not the site. That is why each company provides numerous ways of accessing their content beyond their websites. From Amazon’s affiliate scheme to YouTube’s embed feature, it is possible for these companies to reach audiences who may never go to their websites.

Twitter is probably the best example of all. What percentage of the time do you read tweets (or post them) via the twitter website? If you are like me, then the answer is very rarely.

Twitter website

The lesson here is obvious – as website owners we need to start thinking in terms of a broader web strategy and releasing our content from the shackles of our websites. How then do we do this? I would like to propose 10 possible opportunities that you may wish to consider integrating into your online approach.

1. Targeting the desktop

eBay recognised they had a need for a desktop application. Many people make their living from selling on eBay and these people needed desktop software that streamlined their business processes. They needed desktop notifications, faster more desktop like interaction and easier access to eBay features.

eBay Desktop

Using platforms like Adobe AIR it is easy to take web based content and functionality to the desktop. This is exactly what they did and it has proved very successful among their power users.

As a website owner you should be asking whether a desktop application is right for you. Do your users need desktop features, offline access or better integration with the operating system.

2. Going mobile

uStream iPhone Application

It won’t be long before more users access the web via a mobile device than do using a PC. In many countries this is already the case.

Traditional website often render poorly on mobile devices or are hard to use. They also do not take into account the context of being a mobile user. It is therefore necessary to approach the mobile web as a different channel to your traditional website.

Methods of delivering content to the mobile web include…

  • Producing mobile websites – Mobile sites take into account small screens, different input devices and the numerous other unique characteristics of the mobile web.
  • Using text messaging – Text messaging is ideal for notifications and updates. A perfect compliment to your website and a way of keeping users informed.
  • Building mobile applications - Mobile platforms like the iPhone and Android make it increasingly easy to build applications that run directly on the mobile device. This provides opportunities to make your content available even when the user is not connected or away from their PC.

Pushing your content to mobile devices is ideal if your target audience is often away from their computers or require access to your content while ‘in the field’.

3. Start twittering

Twitter is surrounded by so much hype at the moment. However, it does provide a unique opportunity to reach a larger audience with your message. The question is, how best to use it?

Some organisations use twitter as a broadcast tool. This is fundamentally an alternative to RSS. An example of this is BBC news who provide latest updates via the service.

However to use Twitter as a broadcast tool, fails to grasp its real power. Organisations who really ‘get’ twitter include Zappos and Omnifocus. They use Twitter as a way to engage with their followers and even provide customer support.

Use Twitter as a way to engage with your audience. If you have a number of people working on your site, encourage them all of them to twitter, rather than having a single ‘branded’ account.

4. Writing for others

Writing for other sites provides an excellent opportunity to demonstrate your expertise and spread your message to a larger audience than would otherwise be possible on your own website.

Do not limit your words of wisdom to your own website. Look for other editorial sites and blogs who are speaking to your audience and offer to write for them. After all your audience visits many sites other than your own. Why limit your writing skills to your own blog when you can reach new audiences by writing for others?

Of course, any article you write for others has to be more than shameless self promotion. The owners of those sites are going to want quality content that fits their site and is of interest to their audience. For example I recently wrote an article for a site whose audience was franchise owners. If I had simply written about how great Headscape was then I doubt it would have been published. Instead I shared a case study of our experience working with a franchise based business. The content was both relevant to the publication and useful to their audience. However, at the same time it raised our profile among a potential new customer base.

An example of the bio which appears when I write for others

What sites exist that reach your target market? Would they consider publishing some of your content? How could you rewrite your content to make it more appealing to them?

5. Embracing Facebook

Another option that allows you to expand your web strategy beyond the website is Facebook.

I am sure it is unnecessary for me to explain the importance and reach of Facebook. However, you maybe tempted to dismiss it because your target market is not the teenage audience normally associated with these kinds of social networking sites.

What may surprise you is that Facebook is no longer confined to the younger demographic. Over the last year the number of users between 35-54 has jumped by 276% to over 6 million.

So how do you reach your audience on Facebook? There are three good starting points…

  • Create a group – Groups have been around a long time and are ideal for building a dialogue with those already interested in your product or service. You can easily invite people to participate and those people in turn can invite others. This makes groups ideally suited for viral marketing
  • Create a fan page – Fan pages are basically public profiles for organisations rather than individuals. Unlike groups, pages are public facing. This means non-facebook users can see them and they are indexed by search engines. Fan pages are perfect for building long-term awareness and for reaching people both inside and outside of Facebook.
  • Create an application – Facebook allows third parties to build ‘applications’ that can be add to user profiles. These can range from games to RSS feeds. Unlike pages or groups, some technical skill is required to build an application. However, the possibility of users embedding your content into their profiles makes this an attractive proposition if you have appropriate content.

Carsonified Fan Page on Facebook

Of course Facebook is not the only site of this nature. However, it does have considerable reach and provides some the best tools for reaching their massive audience.

6. Developing widgets and APIs

The ultimate way of distributing content has to be by providing an API or widget.

An API gives other web developers access to your content allowing them to build applications and websites around it. Using an API, a developer could do anything from embed your content into their site, to build a desktop application that offers your functionality.

Twitter really gets APIs. When was the last time you viewed or posted tweets from their website? The chances are it was a long time ago. Because Twitter offers a powerful API, thousands of developers have built all kinds of applications allowing you to view and post tweets. Infact, what Twitter offers is very basic. However, because of their API it is possible to do everything from view Tweets on a google map to post photos, video and audio.

Screenshot of Tweetdeck

Unfortunately, APIs do have some drawbacks. They require a considerable level of technical expertise to implement. As a result they are only of use to developers. What about the rest of us? How do we add third party content to our sites? That is where widgets come in.

Widgets are typically a small piece of code that you can copy and paste into your website. There are literally thousands of widgets available. They allow website owners to utilise the content and functionality from other sites quickly and easily. Widgets are used to embed YouTube videos, show your Amazon wishlist or display your location on a map.

Widgets are powerful because they are easy to implement. This means anybody can add them, so distributing your content as far as possible.

Widgets are also easier to build than a full API. This makes them a good starting point for those wishing to put their content in front of more people.

7. Offering better feeds

Not all approaches to putting content in front of users has to be as time consuming or complex to develop as an API. There is one thing you could do to increase views within a few minutes.

Increasingly users are relying on RSS feeds as a way to consume content from websites. This is especially true for news, articles or blog posts. However, some website owners are so obsessed with driving traffic to their sites that they only provide a teaser of the post via RSS. To read the whole article, the user is forced to ‘click through’ to the website.

This approach to RSS is counter productive. When a user is browsing a large number of feeds, they are less likely to read your content if they have to leave their news reader to do so.

To maximise a users exposure to your content, ensure as much of it as possible is displayed within the RSS feed itself. Only require a user to click through when absolutely necessary.

Google Reader displaying a partial RSS feed

It is also important to note that when users are reading content from an RSS feed, they do not have the context of your website. It is therefore necessary to ensure content stands alone and that calls to action are incorporated in the copy of your posts.

8. Using multimedia

Of course, it is becoming increasingly unnecessary to limit your content to the written word. Creating audio or video content has become trivial with services like YouTube and applications like Audioboo making production and hosting easy.

Also, pioneers like Diggnation and Wine Library TV have shown that users care more about quality content than high production values. Both shows are essentially presenters talking to a single locked off camera. This kind of production value can be achieved with a consumer camera and basic editing software.

That said, creating popular content is harder than it first appears. Many organisations believe that simply uploading their latest product demonstration to YouTube will generate millions of views. This is simply not the case.

Good rich media content has to be engaging if you want people to watch, or more importantly recommend it to a friend. This can be done through a passionate presenter, great content, humour or shock value. With thousands of videos uploaded everyday it is important that your video stands out from the crowd.

Wine Library TV website

However, do not forget your content has to be appropriate to your target audience. Shock tactics may work well for a teenage audience, but it might not go down so well with a middle aged business executive!

9. Start streaming

The next wave of multimedia on the web is not going to be pre-recorded material. It is going to be live streaming.

Services such as ustream, qik, and Justin TV are all fighting to dominate this space. Each offers the opportunity to stream live content to the web at zero cost. This makes the barrier to entry extremely low.

The main benefit of this approach over pre-recorded material is interactivity. The live format allows viewers to engage with the presenter in real time via chat. This offers a host of opportunities including (but not limited to)…

  • Live product demonstrations – Live streaming allows you present your products and services while talking questions from the audience. This is considerably more powerful that pre-recorded promotional videos.
  • Community sessions – If you run an online community, live streaming gives you the chance to engage with that community on a much more personal level than the written word. Social news site digg.com have run a number of ‘Town Hall’ meetings where their user base engage directly with the CEO and founder.
  • Online training – Finally, live streaming is a perfect environment to provide remote training. Whether you are providing training on using your product or selling online workshops, live streaming provides the opportunity for users to both hear and see what you are doing.

Digg Town Hall

Live streaming is still relatively immature and few are taking advantage of this new opportunity. There is a real chance to differentiate yourself through its use.

10. Don’t forget email

Amongst all this talk of video, audio and APIs it is easy to forget the tools we have always had for reaching beyond the confines of our website.

Although not the ‘sexiest’ tool in our list, I could not end this post without mentioning email. Email should be a key component in keeping your content in front of users.

Obviously, email can be used for a lot more than syndicating content. However, for the purposes of this article you should use email as a way for users to subscribe to your content. If a user can subscribe to your content via RSS, they should also be able to do so via email.

Fortunately services like Feedburner makes this easy. If your RSS feed is managed by them, users can also subscribe via email when you adding a single link to your site.

I do however want to share a word of warning – If a user subscribes to your content via email, they are not giving you permission to spam them indiscriminately. If you fail to respect their email subscription, you are in danger of loosing that user and potentially having them post negative comment that could put off others.

Conclusion

There was a time when build a website was enough. However, increasingly your website should be just one small part of your website strategy. It is naive to expect users to come to you. Instead, you need to take your content to them, whether that is on a social network like Facebook or a mobile device like the iPhone.